SFO to Rome via Heathrow. How long a layover?
Aug 20th, 2006, 03:18 PM
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,798
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SFO to Rome via Heathrow. How long a layover?
I'm looking around for fares for a SFO - Rome trip next year and was wondering what you think a "safe" layover time in Heathrow would be? I'm seeing 90 minute layovers in Heathrow and other airports which does not seem like a lot of time. How much time should I be looking for in layovers generally, as well as with reagrds specifically to LHR?
Thanks.
-Bill
Thanks.
-Bill
Aug 20th, 2006, 03:31 PM
#2
LHR is a special case because of British Airways' unwillingness to connect bags to other carriers. It's not that they can't (and in fact they have numerous interline baggage agreements) but that they seem to be very reluctant to do so.
If bags have to be claimed and rechecked, then LHR can be just dreadful for connections, because of the need to travel between terminals, especially if the dreaded Terminal 4 is part of the mixture.
I generally would not plan on a change as short as 90 min. unless it was an all-BA itinerary (i.e. BA SFO-LHR-FCO.) BA plus another carrier is asking for trouble. You may cruise through with no problem, but you may not...
If bags have to be claimed and rechecked, then LHR can be just dreadful for connections, because of the need to travel between terminals, especially if the dreaded Terminal 4 is part of the mixture.
I generally would not plan on a change as short as 90 min. unless it was an all-BA itinerary (i.e. BA SFO-LHR-FCO.) BA plus another carrier is asking for trouble. You may cruise through with no problem, but you may not...
Aug 20th, 2006, 06:19 PM
#4
Just my opinion, but I would much prefer any of those airports to LHR. If I recall correctly, both FRA and MUC have instituted very short minimum connection times (MCT) - some as little as 30 min. I doubt anyone would ticket you with that short a connection, but it's possible. AMS is also a very efficient terminal, but it's been awhile since I connected through there. Others have more recent info I expect.
Aug 21st, 2006, 01:39 AM
#5
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
iamq,
which airlines are you planning to use on both legs? As Gardyloo pointed out, 90min for LHR connection seems too tight IMO even if within T1/2/3.
Agree with Gardyloo that LHA/MUC/AMS are more functional airports, though in any case 90min could be tight A)if the incoming flight gets delayed, or B)IF your luggages are NOT checked through to the final destination.
AMS connection is very good, though 30-45min seems too tight even with checked thru luggage as it is a large airport. MUC 30-45min doable if LH on both legs and no flight delay.
which airlines are you planning to use on both legs? As Gardyloo pointed out, 90min for LHR connection seems too tight IMO even if within T1/2/3.
Agree with Gardyloo that LHA/MUC/AMS are more functional airports, though in any case 90min could be tight A)if the incoming flight gets delayed, or B)IF your luggages are NOT checked through to the final destination.
AMS connection is very good, though 30-45min seems too tight even with checked thru luggage as it is a large airport. MUC 30-45min doable if LH on both legs and no flight delay.
Aug 21st, 2006, 01:40 AM
#6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am no Europe airports expert at all but in the past when visiting Europe Frankfurt and Amsterdam were fast and efficient and deffinately the best of the busy airports to connect thru, Amsterdam especialy, have not been thru Munich for many years but would no doubt be good too, pity you don't have Swiss from SFO as Zurich was also very easy. I would avoid Heathrow or Paris.
Aug 21st, 2006, 04:59 AM
#7
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 23,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AMS is an efficient airport, but it has expanded a lot over the years, so it's large. You definitely have to get from the non-Schengen side to the Schengen side for a US-AMS-Italy connection, so the walk can be pretty long. An hour will be minimum.
Aug 26th, 2006, 07:29 AM
#12
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Keep your eye on Lufthansa fares. I flew from SFO thru Munich to Florence last year without any problems. Though I used FF miles, there were reasonable fares available in January for my April trip.
Aug 26th, 2006, 04:28 PM
#14
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gardyloo,
BA will only refuse to interline bags if you travel on separate tickets. If your itinerary is on the same ticket, BA will interline - regardless of carrier
That said, I try and avoid the necessity of through checking baggage on any carrier at any airport. Sometimes, immigration requirements will dictate otherwise but I have little faith in any airport/airline when it comes to connecting my baggage in the same direction as myself.
BA will only refuse to interline bags if you travel on separate tickets. If your itinerary is on the same ticket, BA will interline - regardless of carrier
That said, I try and avoid the necessity of through checking baggage on any carrier at any airport. Sometimes, immigration requirements will dictate otherwise but I have little faith in any airport/airline when it comes to connecting my baggage in the same direction as myself.
Aug 28th, 2006, 01:24 PM
#16
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 19,881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Given the current security situation I wouldn't recommend using ANY UK airport for transit because apart from the obvious security delays you lose any enhanced hand luggage allowance you have.
See http://tinyurl.com/raalf
See http://tinyurl.com/raalf
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mk_Gowthaman
Air Travel
10
Aug 15th, 2011 08:34 AM
