Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Travel Topics > Air Travel
Reload this Page >

Seat belts - are they really necessary?

Search

Seat belts - are they really necessary?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 20th, 2009 | 03:45 AM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,885
Likes: 0
Seat belts - are they really necessary?

<i>Forty-seven people were injured when an airliner was hit by severe turbulence as it neared the end of a flight from Manila to Tokyo.
Terrified passengers told how those without seatbelts fastened shot up and hit the ceiling of the plane.
At least six passengers on the Northwest Airline plane were seriously injured, officials say.</i>

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7900892.stm


I just hope our friend Wally was not on that flight, standing around and enjoying his glass of cheap wine....

High price to pay if you were one of the 6 seriously injured......
AAFrequentFlyer is offline  
Old Feb 20th, 2009 | 06:20 AM
  #2  
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 0
Except for bathroom trips mine is on from the time I sit down until the plane has come to a stop.
You never know when you might hit turbulence.
MarthaT is offline  
Old Feb 20th, 2009 | 06:29 AM
  #3  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,605
Likes: 0
Me, too. I don't find them confining. Even when dozing on overnight flights, I leave it on.
The really sad thing is people holding babies in their laps, don't they realize they cannot hold on to the child in extreme turbulence?
Travelnut is offline  
Old Feb 20th, 2009 | 07:47 AM
  #4  
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,293
Likes: 0
That's right. These airlines should just hand everyone a diaper and they can pee and poop to their hearts content in it during those 10-15 hour flights!!!

BTW, has anyone ever flown on Air Force One? Do they make Obama strap down for the entire flight, or do they turn off the fasten seatbelt?
wally34949 is offline  
Old Feb 20th, 2009 | 08:12 AM
  #5  
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,293
Likes: 0
I bet Northwest Airlines is saying the fasten seatbelt sign had been on for 14 hours straight, so no one should have been out of their seat.
wally34949 is offline  
Old Feb 20th, 2009 | 01:50 PM
  #6  
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,950
Likes: 0
Mine's on all the time to except for bathroom breaks for exactly the reason stated in the article.
Carrybean is offline  
Old Feb 20th, 2009 | 03:28 PM
  #7  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,153
Likes: 83
What's the big deal about keeping your seatbelt on when seated? It's common sense.
Melnq8 is offline  
Old Feb 21st, 2009 | 01:42 AM
  #8  
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,950
Likes: 0
And it doesn't have to be straight-jacket tight either. Of course, if you're obese it may not be able to be loosened.
Carrybean is offline  
Old Feb 21st, 2009 | 11:18 AM
  #9  
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,121
Likes: 0
Seat belts can prevent you from being injured in severe turbulence; they can even prevent you from being killed. I don't understand why anyone would refuse to wear them when they are just sitting, anyway. I suppose those are the same people who refuse to wear seat belts in a car.

Yes, President Obama and everyone else on board Air Force One has to wear seat belts when the seat-belt sign is on. The pilot in command has the final say, not the President. Besides, a person has to be relatively stupid to refuse to ensure his own safety, and Obama is hardly stupid. However, I presume that in calm air, the sign is turned off.
AnthonyGA is offline  
Old Feb 21st, 2009 | 11:38 AM
  #10  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,885
Likes: 0
Most flights follow the same exact route of the previous flight and the communicate with the pilots ahead and behind them.

They will warn each other of air pockets and in most cases that seems to work fine as the first report gives the pilots behind a sense of what's going on.

Unfortunately, on occasion, the first one that experienced the air pocket had no warning, as it appears happened in this case, and the idiots that refuse to keep on their seat belts when sitting down, regardless if the sign is on or off, will get hurt.

I never had a problem using a bathroom even if the seatbelt sign is on, unless it was obvious that there is heavy turbulence.

Apparently our friend Wally has a hard time understanding the simple safety concept.
AAFrequentFlyer is offline  
Old Feb 22nd, 2009 | 03:58 AM
  #11  
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,293
Likes: 0
What I'm trying to say (I wish you would stop saying it for me) is that if you are on a flight and the fasten seatbelt sign is on for six hours straight but there is no turbulence, one will probably feel that the pilot forgot to turn of the fasten seatbelt sign and get up and use the needed bathroom. Then the turbulence hits.

It still amazes me that foreign airlines usually turn the fasten seatbelt sign off as soon as the plane reaches 5,000 feet while U.S. airlines keep it on until the plane reaches cruising altitude and some just keep it on all of the time.

I like to try to use the toilet before the flight attendants get their carts out. I have no problem keeping my seatbelt fastened when I'm sitting.
wally34949 is offline  
Old Feb 23rd, 2009 | 02:20 PM
  #12  
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,121
Likes: 0
If the seat-belt sign seems to be on excessively and there is no obvious turbulence, ask the crew to ask the captain why the light is still on.

If the captain doesn't have an explanation and the light stays on, remind the crew that if you wet your pants, you might feel inclined to sue for the emotional distress and physical hardship that results, and then the captain will have no choice but to explain what legitimate safety concerns motivated him to keep the light on.
AnthonyGA is offline  
Old Feb 24th, 2009 | 10:13 AM
  #13  
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,293
Likes: 0
Anthony

It is common practice for Continental to keep the fasten seat belt sign on to all flights to Europe (night flights), at least that is what I was told by the flight attendant.
wally34949 is offline  
Old Feb 25th, 2009 | 01:29 PM
  #14  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,445
Likes: 0
"Airpockets"? You are showing your age. There are no holes in the atmosphere, just rising and descending air currents. If you fly into a column of descending air, you will descend (duh). I'm sure that it will come with time, but right now there is no technology to warn of clear air turbulence; radar needs to bounce off of something, and air does not fit the bill.
Bobmrg is offline  
Old Feb 26th, 2009 | 04:38 AM
  #15  
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,032
Likes: 0
Actually CAT radar does exist as evidenced by a cursory search on The Google. However, the cost seems to be extremely high due to the high power required.
NoFlyZone is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tinyteacup
Europe
25
Aug 19th, 2011 09:37 PM
partyon
Air Travel
6
Nov 11th, 2007 07:43 PM
funjione
Air Travel
12
Jul 31st, 2006 01:11 PM
SRQRobin
United States
5
Jun 1st, 2005 06:39 AM
Parrothead
United States
13
Jun 27th, 2003 09:21 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -