Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Travel Topics > Air Travel
Reload this Page >

No food in AA domestic Coach

Search

No food in AA domestic Coach

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 20th, 2004 | 02:01 PM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,611
Likes: 0
No food in AA domestic Coach

American Airlines, the world's largest carrier, will sell $3 snack boxes on about a third of its daily U.S. flights beginning Feb. 1, ending hot-meal service in the main cabin to save $30 million a year.

The snack boxes will be sold on more than 500 daily flights that last longer than three hours, including 200 where they will replace free snack bags to coach passengers and 300 without meals.

The service will replace hot meals on 120 cross-country and 40 Hawaii flights, the Fort Worth-based airline says.
Keith is offline  
Old Dec 20th, 2004 | 02:31 PM
  #2  
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,219
Likes: 0
My husband, who travels a lot on business, dislikes airline food so much that he has always said that when an airline doesn't serve a meal, that's the good news.
abram is offline  
Old Dec 20th, 2004 | 06:58 PM
  #3  
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
I agree with your husband. Airline food is typically awful (unless you are in first or business class). I recently flew US Air who only provided food to those that piad $5.00. It was a sandwich from Hard Rock Cafe and was quite good. I have no problem paying $5.00 extra for food that is edible rather than getting (or typically passing) on food that is terrible --espeically if it keeps the airlines in business. Just my thoughts.
Pablostraz is offline  
Old Dec 21st, 2004 | 03:38 AM
  #4  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,154
Likes: 0
Pablostraz, I agree with your take on this. This seems like a way for everyone to win, considering everything involved.
Flyboy is offline  
Old Dec 21st, 2004 | 06:04 AM
  #5  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,491
Likes: 0
Happy enough to have this change, since it allows us to choose between airport take-away and airline potluck -- neither optimal but better than the fiction of "meal" on the flight itinerary. Delta's been doing this for a while (for more money, but decent food). The main benefit is for when you either have no time between flights to grab something or your flight is too early in the morning for any places in the airport to be open. Delta's breakfast wrap isn't half bad. I wouldn't expect AA's to be all that great, but I hope they have one.
soccr is offline  
Old Dec 21st, 2004 | 06:00 PM
  #6  
P_M
Conversation Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 26,168
Likes: 0
Interesting, thanks for the info. I'm OK w/this because I don't care for airplane food anyway. If I want a meal on the plane, I'll grab a sandwich at the airport and eat it on the plane. Let's cross our fingers that this cost savings to AA will be passed on to us in the form of more sale prices on tix.
P_M is online now  
Old Dec 22nd, 2004 | 04:23 AM
  #7  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,130
Likes: 0
I haven't had more than a bag of pretzels on any domestic AA flight since 9/11 or earlier. So, this is good news since I typically grab a sandwich or wrap at an airport kiosk anyhow. This will just save me the time of waiting in line for one.

Thanks for the info, Keith
Statia is offline  
Old Dec 26th, 2004 | 04:35 PM
  #8  
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
I travel often and cannot for the life of me understand why some people want airline food. Is it because it is "free" because it most certainly is not. Is it because it is good.....cannot be so. Frankly, given the stuff they have served on AA over the years and passed off as regular food I welcome the new policy. Would much rather have a decent movie than some sort of overcooked plastic mystery meal. AA's business should increase now that they have discontinued thier meals!
allanc is offline  
Old Dec 26th, 2004 | 05:34 PM
  #9  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,049
Likes: 0
If you think a money-losing airline is going to take the money they save by eliminating snacks and give better entertainment or lower ticket prices, you are naive beyond belief. More likely, they will reason that after a few months without snacks, they will have slimmed down the passengers, allowing them to implement LRTC. Perhaps they can also replace some the of FAs with a vending machine.
clevelandbrown is offline  
Old Dec 26th, 2004 | 08:13 PM
  #10  
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
I'm surprised they haven't started charging to use the W.C.

That would not upset me, as I've never used a public loo, and hope I never do.
HyacinthBucket is offline  
Old Dec 27th, 2004 | 08:43 AM
  #11  
Cassandra
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Emmmm, Mrs. Bucket, dare I ask the alternative while traveling?
 
Old Dec 27th, 2004 | 08:53 AM
  #12  
P_M
Conversation Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 26,168
Likes: 0
I was about to ask that same question, Cassandra. Maybe her bladder is the size of a bucket.
P_M is online now  
Old Dec 28th, 2004 | 04:06 AM
  #13  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,130
Likes: 0
Maybe she just uses the bucket?
Statia is offline  
Old Dec 28th, 2004 | 04:40 AM
  #14  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,611
Likes: 0
But that is pronounced "Bouquet."

Keith
Keith is offline  
Old Dec 30th, 2004 | 10:26 PM
  #15  
jor
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 0
The Bucket Woman would never be caught using a public W.C. He's a cross dresser from Florida who chases the post man and the neighbors!
jor is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
0311
Europe
4
Mar 5th, 2008 06:14 AM
ed
Air Travel
21
Feb 15th, 2006 07:37 AM
planeguy
United States
14
Sep 26th, 2005 08:35 AM
nolists
Air Travel
18
Jan 30th, 2005 08:31 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -