Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Travel Topics > Air Travel
Reload this Page >

Emirates to launch A380 service to JFK

Search

Emirates to launch A380 service to JFK

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 22nd, 2008 | 06:51 AM
  #21  
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,216
Likes: 0

Because seat revenues for international, long distance aircraft are the highest, the A380 is the most efficient plane if it is full. Which, of course, is the goal of every airline. Regional aircraft are the worst because of frequent take off and landings. Those routes will be seriously curtailed in the future. The A380 maybe turn out to be a savior for international travel as no other current aircraft can deliver it's level of efficiency.

As far as regional airline upgrading their current fleets that is not going to happen because there will be a plethora of new, lightly used aircraft on the market due to other airlines going out of business.

"Also, wonder how much longer the waiting will be for bags, security etc etc., given that it's a massive number of people on board?"

Convenience will not longer be a factor for airlines as they will be happy just to be in business and you will be happy just to be able to fly to your destination.

copain1 is offline  
Old Jun 22nd, 2008 | 07:59 AM
  #22  
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 23,073
Likes: 0
The 773ER and the upcoming 748 already matches the 380's efficiency in terms of cost per seat miles. And the 787 and 350 will surpass it.

The 380's advantage is at slot controlled airports. Like LHR, NRT, and in a limited sense JFK. Each pairs of slots at these airports are expensive and hard to get, so you want to have the highest capacity to serve these airports.
rkkwan is offline  
Old Jun 22nd, 2008 | 08:00 AM
  #23  
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 23,073
Likes: 0
And also, on markets that have frequencies restricted by government regulations.
rkkwan is offline  
Old Jun 22nd, 2008 | 08:18 AM
  #24  
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,216
Likes: 0

Airports will reconfigure and markets will adjust in the short term.

And as far as the A350 & 787.

Who knows. They still have a long way to go and the market may not support them at all. A 20 percent improvement in fuel efficiency is not enough to offset fuel prices.
copain1 is offline  
Old Jun 22nd, 2008 | 08:38 AM
  #25  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,885
Likes: 0
<i>A 20 percent improvement in fuel efficiency is not enough to offset fuel prices.</i>

when your fuel bill is 1 cool billion then 20% does make a BIG difference....
AAFrequentFlyer is offline  
Old Jun 22nd, 2008 | 09:17 AM
  #26  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 26,778
Likes: 0
<i>And as far as the A350 &amp; 787.

Who knows. They still have a long way to go and the market may not support them at all.</i>

Well, if the market doesn't support these planes, then that doesn't say much for the future of air travel. In terms of size and range, both of these planes are aimed at the bulk of the international routes being flown today.
travelgourmet is offline  
Old Jun 22nd, 2008 | 09:33 AM
  #27  
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,216
Likes: 0

&quot;bulk of the international routes being flown today.&quot;

You can probably remove the word bulk out of the equation.
copain1 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gardyloo
Air Travel
6
Dec 17th, 2015 05:40 AM
richardab
Air Travel
9
Oct 5th, 2007 04:01 AM
Underhill
Air Travel
15
Dec 19th, 2005 09:49 AM
monghut
Air Travel
5
Feb 1st, 2004 10:06 AM
Donna
Asia
4
Apr 18th, 2002 08:38 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -