Connecting Through Chicago (ORD) or Washington Dulles (IAD)?
#1
Original Poster
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Connecting Through Chicago (ORD) or Washington Dulles (IAD)?
my mom and i are going to europe this winter over the holidays on a river cruise but we are planning on going in a few days early. our big decision is that we want to fly economy plus on united as much as possible. there are no non stop flights from LAX-AMS on UA, therefore we need to connect in either ORD or IAD. we are leaving dec 23, right at the height of xmas travel and beginning of winter. i have never connected through ORD before, only been there as a final destination and i've never been to IAD. i am looking for some advice and experiences where we should connect without having any major delays and missing our entire trip in AMS. thanks
#2


Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,156
Likes: 83
This may not help, but I avoid ORD like the plague during the winter months. I'm not a huge fan of Dulles either, but I'd probably choose it over Chicago, although it's certainly not immune to bad weather and you'll have holiday crowds regardless.
#3




Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,771
Likes: 0
United 946 is the "direct" flight from LAX to AMS, with a stop at IAD. (direct=not nonstop but same flight number) Every time I have taken the LAX-IAD leg it has been a 777.
For the IAD-AMS leg they now (on Sept 18, anyway) using a 767. The ORD-AMS leg is also a 767.
LAX-AMS-LAX on UA means UA 946/947 to me, stops at IAD each way.
For the IAD-AMS leg they now (on Sept 18, anyway) using a 767. The ORD-AMS leg is also a 767.
LAX-AMS-LAX on UA means UA 946/947 to me, stops at IAD each way.
#4
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,334
Likes: 0
I'm the opposite of melnq8, as I avoid Dulles at any cost! I fly out of ORD all the time.
Transferring at ORD would not mean a long trek, as both of your flights (arrival and departure) should be from terminal 1. Coming back, if you go by way of ORD, you would land at terminal 5 and then have to take the "train" to terminal 1, after going thru customs/immigration, and rechecking bags with UA. Not difficult to do.
Transferring at ORD would not mean a long trek, as both of your flights (arrival and departure) should be from terminal 1. Coming back, if you go by way of ORD, you would land at terminal 5 and then have to take the "train" to terminal 1, after going thru customs/immigration, and rechecking bags with UA. Not difficult to do.
#7
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
IAD is my home airport for long-range travel. Terminal C/D, where you'll be making your connection, is horrible. ORD has much nicer terminals with much better food, etc. choices. But your weather risk is greater at ORD, so there's no free lunch.
Trending Topics
#9




Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,771
Likes: 0
I used IAD for 25 years as home and now connect thru there. The food and shops are not great there but making the connection, outbound, is easy enough.
Last night I flew in a 3-cabin UA 777, like UA 946. I chose 18C, the second row of economy because the seats in the bulkhead rows are too close to the bulkhead to stretch my legs out straight.
But on this 777 there was lots of legroom for the seats in the middle section of row 17, the bulkhead row. Next time I am in economy on a UA 777 like this I will choose 17A or 17G. The pairs of seats on the sides of the plane did not have as much legroom as the 5 seats in the center.
Sitting in 18C my legroom was constricted horizontally by the electronics box for the seat back video. I assume row 17 has a flip out video screen in the arm.
Winter weather is less severe in D.C. than Chicago.
Last night I flew in a 3-cabin UA 777, like UA 946. I chose 18C, the second row of economy because the seats in the bulkhead rows are too close to the bulkhead to stretch my legs out straight.
But on this 777 there was lots of legroom for the seats in the middle section of row 17, the bulkhead row. Next time I am in economy on a UA 777 like this I will choose 17A or 17G. The pairs of seats on the sides of the plane did not have as much legroom as the 5 seats in the center.
Sitting in 18C my legroom was constricted horizontally by the electronics box for the seat back video. I assume row 17 has a flip out video screen in the arm.
Winter weather is less severe in D.C. than Chicago.
#10

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,730
Likes: 7
Typically in December IAD does not experience bad weather...it can happen, but it is rare to have a bad snow or ice storm that early in the Winter. The food selection at IAD is not great, but tranferring from one UA flight to another is easy...although I think u could get a direct flight with 1 stop and no plane change. We have flown on UA flight 946 to AMS from IAD which comes from LAX. Its always been a 777. 17A&B and 21H&G are good seats for E+. enjoy your trip!
#11
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,334
Likes: 0
I guess my concerns with flying thru ORD vs IAD are not so much weather concerns as they are just airport conveniences and things like customs/immigration lines. IMO ORD is more prepared for bad weather as it is commonplace. The big planes don't get grounded very often. It's those smaller commuter flights that stay on the ground.
yestravel, seats 21H&G econ+ are good seats on the 777 IF the flight crew is using rows 17-20. Otherwise, I'd try for 17H&G.
yestravel, seats 21H&G econ+ are good seats on the 777 IF the flight crew is using rows 17-20. Otherwise, I'd try for 17H&G.
#12

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,620
Likes: 0
ORD is my home airport, and I've connected through IAD on occasion over the years. I'm not sure it makes much difference on the outbound; both terminals are easy enough for domestic-international connections, and both airports can have weather issues on any given day. I'd make sure to have a comfortable connection time in either case. O'Hare opened a new third parallel east-west runway late last year, and I've read some reports that it has helped quite a bit in cutting down on arrival delays.
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pandaschu
Europe
13
Jun 9th, 2004 05:50 PM





