Baby Put Through Airport X-Ray Machine
#3
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,885
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#4
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Did the TSA not notice a baby was being placed on the belt and entering the xray? They are usually standing at the opening of the xray barking orders at everyone.
And yes, some people should not be allowed to be parents.
And yes, some people should not be allowed to be parents.
#7
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 19,419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Grandma hardly spoke English. If this was her very first flight, she was very nervous, of course. And if she put the baby down to remove the shoes, did she even notice it was a conveyor belt and it moved?
I think it's one of those freak accidents, nothing more.
And yes, Annw, please visit her house, remove the microwave, and make sure there are no ferrets in the house
I think it's one of those freak accidents, nothing more.
And yes, Annw, please visit her house, remove the microwave, and make sure there are no ferrets in the house
#9
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What do you expect of the geniuses who work for the TSA? They were probably so busy making sure that passengers take off their shoes and don't pack toothpaste that they were not paying attention to the belt.
#13
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"Some people should not be allowed to be parents or grandparents."
Obviously written by someone who has never been confused in a foreign country or made an embarrassing mistake. A little tolerance for non-English-speakers goes a long way. After all, how many languages do most of us know?
If I keep my shoes on, TSA spots them from yards away; they should be able to notice a baby in a bin. But even with signs and precautions, accidents will happen.
Obviously written by someone who has never been confused in a foreign country or made an embarrassing mistake. A little tolerance for non-English-speakers goes a long way. After all, how many languages do most of us know?
If I keep my shoes on, TSA spots them from yards away; they should be able to notice a baby in a bin. But even with signs and precautions, accidents will happen.
#15
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The screeners are so busy enforcing a continually-increasing, ever-changing multitude of arbitrary rules dealing with specific minutiae (shoes, nail clippers, toothpaste tubes) that they just don't have time to exercise common sense or to look for anything that's not in today's Official List of Threats. The screeners didn't see the baby because it wasn't one of the things they're supposed to be looking for. The solution will most likely be a small patch, in the form of a directive from TSA management to add "babies" to the list of things to check.
Whatever you might think of the parents, this story merely demonstrates that the TSA's bureaucracy and its entire approach to "security" is incompetently administered, ineptly implemented and utterly worthless. The TSA's management seems to believe that they're dealing with an enemy as inept and bumbling as they are. That is obviously a fatal flaw.
"Security" means more than myopic obsession with a selected set of past and potential terrorist threats. It needs to be comprehensive, without leaving obvious gaps that encourage common threats such as theft and loss of property-- and clueless parents who put their babies on the conveyor belt. But TSA management doesn't seem either capable of or interested in recognizing this reality.
No, they don't need rules to follow about checking for babies. If the screeners were really doing their job as part of an effective security system, they would have noticed the baby before it got zapped. A screener should, after all, be noticing and responding to things that are out of whack even if they're not on today's authorized list of threats du jour. But I don't blame the screeners for failing to notice the baby. I blame an inept bureaucracy that prevents the screeners from noticing babies in the wrong place-- or from noticing numerous other things that could be vitally important.
Whatever you might think of the parents, this story merely demonstrates that the TSA's bureaucracy and its entire approach to "security" is incompetently administered, ineptly implemented and utterly worthless. The TSA's management seems to believe that they're dealing with an enemy as inept and bumbling as they are. That is obviously a fatal flaw.
"Security" means more than myopic obsession with a selected set of past and potential terrorist threats. It needs to be comprehensive, without leaving obvious gaps that encourage common threats such as theft and loss of property-- and clueless parents who put their babies on the conveyor belt. But TSA management doesn't seem either capable of or interested in recognizing this reality.
No, they don't need rules to follow about checking for babies. If the screeners were really doing their job as part of an effective security system, they would have noticed the baby before it got zapped. A screener should, after all, be noticing and responding to things that are out of whack even if they're not on today's authorized list of threats du jour. But I don't blame the screeners for failing to notice the baby. I blame an inept bureaucracy that prevents the screeners from noticing babies in the wrong place-- or from noticing numerous other things that could be vitally important.
#16
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,545
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Every foreign country I've flown through has x-ray machines. Also, virtually all signs at LAX are in both English and Spanish and many of the people who work there speak both languages.
I still think that the grandparent is at fault and yes she should not handle children let alone have had them in the first place.
I still think that the grandparent is at fault and yes she should not handle children let alone have had them in the first place.
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TC
Air Travel
8
Oct 26th, 2010 04:46 AM