Search

Yellowstone in July

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 14th, 2004 | 10:23 PM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Yellowstone in July

We've heard that fires have destroyed a lot of vegetation in Yellowstone National Park. We were planning a trip there this July but would like advice on whether it is best to postpone the trip for another year or so to allow the park to recover. Also, any advice on accommodation there. Thanks.
austraveller is offline  
Old Feb 14th, 2004 | 10:39 PM
  #2  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 0
We went to Yellowstone in 1989...the year after the BIG fire in Yellowstone.

Why? Here are 3 reasons.

#1 No fire can take away the natural beauty of the whole area.

#2 The previous year fire kept the tourism down just because people like you thought it would be a bad time to visit.

#3 There were so many wildflowers blooming it made up for any burnt areas. Also there were many, many little baby trees already beginning to grow where the others had been burnt.

By all means go and don't let the previous years fires be the reason not to go. You would have to wait many years before the burnt area is replaced with trees. Infact, you can still see evidence of the 1988 fire.

Utahtea
utahtea is offline  
Old Feb 15th, 2004 | 05:32 AM
  #3  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,305
Likes: 0
Utahtea has said it all! Go!
HowardR is offline  
Old Feb 15th, 2004 | 05:50 AM
  #4  
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 0
The fires were in 1988, 16 years ago.
At that altitude, 1 year is not going to make much of a difference growth wise. The recovery cycle is more like 40 years, not 12 months.

I am not sure what you have been reading, or hearing, but recovery is fairly far along, but it will be 20-25 years or more before the lodgepole forests are back to pre fire covering.
In the meantime, I enjoy the open areas.

Many of the old snags are still standing, which amazes me. After all these years they are still upright.
Many hundreds of thousands of others are lying on the ground, and they rot slowly and return to soil.

In the meantime, new ones are growing and other plants have taken their place. Many flowers, etc can be seen that were previously choked out by the forest canopy.

Besides not all of the park burned, and the geyser basins don't have trees anyhow, except in patches.
Moreover, fire is part of the natural environment, not an aberration.
brookwood is offline  
Old Feb 15th, 2004 | 10:38 AM
  #5  
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
I just went through Yellowstone in July & Aug of last year. Yes, you can still see some fire damage, but nothing like what you are thinking of. What is beautiful about it is the new growth. July is the best time to go. Definitely go!
bmaloisi is offline  
Old Feb 15th, 2004 | 12:43 PM
  #6  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 0
brookwood,

If you look on the Yellowstone website you will see that there were some wild fires last year in Yellowstone. I think several wildfires are the norm. I was assuming, it was those fires that austraveller was referring to.


Utahtea
utahtea is offline  
Old Feb 15th, 2004 | 01:24 PM
  #7  
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 0
I was there last summer and did not notice any major burns. Where were they, and when did they take place. I know that it was a hot dry summer.
It was miserable at Old Faithful Inn.
Our room was intolerable even though we walked around the geysers until nearly midnight.
brookwood is offline  
Old Feb 15th, 2004 | 01:44 PM
  #8  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 0
I think some wildfires are the norm.

http://www.nps.gov/yell/technical/fire/

http://www.nps.gov/yell/press/03111.htm

The east fire in Aug. 2003, consumed over 18,000 acres. I guess if you don't know how big Yellowstone really is...you might think that's a lot of area.

Utahtea


utahtea is offline  
Old Feb 15th, 2004 | 04:04 PM
  #9  
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
I agree with others that you go ahead with your plans for this year.

Yellowstone's two major draws in my opinion is geology(geysers,springs..) and wildlife. The fires have not had a visible impact on those two.

BTW, as others have pointed out the fires and its impact is nature at work and do not detract from the yellowstone experience. We were there last year.

While it is better to get accomodation inside the park, a reasonable alternative is West yellowstone just outside the park entrance.
world_traveler is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
5gsmom
United States
12
Jan 10th, 2012 11:24 AM
cleo9340
United States
13
Mar 1st, 2009 07:30 PM
Fabio
United States
10
Jul 21st, 2008 01:29 PM
howmyr
United States
6
May 2nd, 2008 01:32 PM
Smokyboy
United States
98
May 1st, 2004 10:06 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -