Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > United States
Reload this Page >

Sir Francis Drake vs. Radisson Miyako?

Search

Sir Francis Drake vs. Radisson Miyako?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 26th, 2003 | 07:45 AM
  #21  
E
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,356
Likes: 0
Kendu, the loonies are out in full force on this thread, I'm afraid. RSebastian and Berkshire are clearly the same (utterly insane)person who has ranted about Union Square under several different names. (Enjoy conversing with yourself, freak?!)He is constantly recommending Cow Hollow, which in comparison with the Drake is just a ridiculous suggestion. The funniest part is, you're from NYC--you'll be fine, fine, fine in Union Square, which you're unlikely to be "wandering" after dark with your kids anyway. Take normal city precautions, and stay at the Drake.
Union Square Freak, buzz off.
E is offline  
Old Aug 26th, 2003 | 02:14 PM
  #22  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Can both of you agree on anything? How about Hyatt on Embracero(hope I spelled it right). Is that a little better of a location. They gave a really good deal. If you two agree, it has to be good.
Thanks
Ken
kendu is offline  
Old Aug 26th, 2003 | 03:14 PM
  #23  
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
Kendu--the Hyatt Embarcadero is also fine. It is more of a corporate hotel then the Drake or Miyako. It is in a MUCH more central location then the Miyako. The area around the Hyatt is a little quiet at night but you are a block off the bay and have quick access to Fisherman's Wharf.

***FYI-you will never get a harmonious opinion on this board in regards to San Francisco hotels. There are a couple people who feel that Union Square is a bad area and will steer you away from there regardless of the hotel. Go with the hotel that works for your family and budget and while the opinions here are very helpful, take them with a grain of salt and supplement them with other advice from sites like tripadvisor.com or the review section on travelocity.com.****
kikahead is offline  
Old Aug 26th, 2003 | 03:49 PM
  #24  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
You guys are great. Done! Hyatt it is!
Thanks
Ken
kendu is offline  
Old Aug 26th, 2003 | 07:26 PM
  #25  
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
The Hyatt Embarcadero is great. Thank goodness you did decide to stay in Union Sqaure.
Earnst is offline  
Old Aug 26th, 2003 | 07:27 PM
  #26  
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
I should have said thank goodness you did "NOT" stay in Union Sqaure. When you see it you'll know what I mean.
Earnst is offline  
Old Aug 27th, 2003 | 10:20 AM
  #27  
E
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,356
Likes: 0
Caveat: Earnst also advises one never to fly into SFO.
E is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
golfin
United States
6
Jun 13th, 2007 07:59 PM
asc
United States
7
Jun 11th, 2005 09:30 PM
Deblynn
United States
27
Jul 7th, 2004 08:25 AM
misscriss
United States
9
Feb 26th, 2004 03:31 AM
rox70047
United States
14
Sep 4th, 2003 02:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -