Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > United States
Reload this Page >

San Francisco VS. Dallas

Search

San Francisco VS. Dallas

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 27th, 2005 | 05:32 PM
  #101  
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
The real votes between San Francisco's and Dallas' desirability are summed up by the Census growth numbers...

Between 1990 and 2000...

Greater Dallas gained 1,172,250 people
Greater San Francisco gained 437,148 people

(http://www.census.gov/population/cen...t29/tab01a.xls)

This means that more people moved to Dallas, and chose to stay in Dallas. Some people moved to San Francisco and chose to stay there. Dallas was almost 3 times as popular as San Francisco.

Does San Francisco offer a better "quality of life"?

Not according to the numbers.
xbt2316 is offline  
Old Dec 28th, 2005 | 04:36 AM
  #102  
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
My vote is for San Fran. Beautiful one-of-a-kind city. I know it costs more, but I believe you get what you pay for. Same goes for other expensive cities like NYC and DC. Expensive, but worth it if you can pull it off.

Nothing wrong with Dallas, but also nothing particularly distinguishing about it.

Hope this helps, Notsure. Looks like you've gotten alot of response to this thread!
Cargillman is offline  
Old Dec 28th, 2005 | 03:25 PM
  #103  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 23,437
Likes: 0
Notsure,

Ultimately the choice comes down to family. You will personally adapt to Dallas if you choose to go there. But which side of the family is tighter, yours or his? Are your children close to cousins, aunts and uncles, grandparents? Can the same closeness be achieved in Dallas? These are some things that no one on this thread can decide but you.
Michael is offline  
Old Dec 29th, 2005 | 07:18 AM
  #104  
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Cargillman, in the case of San Francisco city, you don't get what you pay for. Sure, there are some people who are emotionally commited to living there, but it's not that popular with Americans, and not even popular in the Bay Area. The vast majority (90%) live in the bland San Francisco suburbs.

You can think of San Francisco city's high prices like the high price for heroin. A few people will pay anything to get it... the rest avoid it as an abomination.

Comparing urban areas of Dallas city, like Uptown Dallas, to San Francisco, Dallas wins hands down, with newer and better housing, more pleasant walking streets and hike-bike trails, better shops. Comparing the Dallas suburbs, with its easier traffic, cleaner appearance, vastly better housing and shopping, and its growing number of urban pedestrian villages, it's no wonder that metro Dallas attracts 2-3 times as many residents as metro San Francisco.
xbt2316 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
brock1
United States
8
Sep 23rd, 2015 08:22 AM
wanderer
United States
44
May 4th, 2013 04:10 PM
greenthumbedislander
United States
5
Jan 18th, 2006 08:58 AM
flygirl
United States
32
Jul 9th, 2004 05:36 PM
Aida
United States
18
Jun 17th, 2002 10:25 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -