San Fran ror LA?
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
To me it's no contest: San Francisco. Both have their merits, but San Francisco has scenic beauty, great neighborhoods, you can get around by walking or public transportation, fantastic restaurants. LA isn't nearly as pretty, it's really spread out and you have to drive everyplace, and feels like there's no "there" there. Don't get me wrong, I enjoyed visiting LA, but I could go back to San Francisco again and again.
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
If you're more interested in seeing than doing, SF wins hands down. Many pretty and walkable neighborhoods and sights, compact and easy to get around. As others have noted, LA is spread out and more work to get from place to place, esp. if you're looking for good sightseeing. IMO, LA is a better destination for a trip arranged around activities, while SF is great for either or both.
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
If LA is so bad, why are there so many people living in this wonderful place? Most people who move away, wind up right back here. You can't beat the weather and all of the options of things to do and see. Great museums, plenty of sports teams and a wide variety of super restaurants.
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Why do people try to compare cities like this. New York is not SF, very different. Neither are like LA. I'd take NY for museums, shopping and broadway, SF for food except pizza(NY wins hands down for that), LA, well I have only been there once and didn't like it. It was a smoggy day and I couldn't breath. But I'm sure it has its good points. Just for the record I have lived in both NY and SF.
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
If your question, "why compare cities", is legitimate, the simple answer is that it's one way to put 2 places into perspective. If you know you like NYC for theater/museums/food/great hotels and parks (but that you don't need beaches/sunshine for a satisfying vacation), and you're trying to decide whether to visit Paris vs Capri for the first time, the comparisons are very relevant.
Of course no two cities are quite the same. But putting two beside one another for comparison helps make the differences and similarities stand out.
And in that sense, on the "New York Scale", SF rates much higher than LA.
On the "Miami scale", LA is much higher than SF.
Of course no two cities are quite the same. But putting two beside one another for comparison helps make the differences and similarities stand out.
And in that sense, on the "New York Scale", SF rates much higher than LA.
On the "Miami scale", LA is much higher than SF.