Off Topic: Aqua Dots Recall
#1
Original Poster
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,699
Likes: 0
Off Topic: Aqua Dots Recall
Hi all,
Not travel related, but I think that it is important,
Aqua Dots is a very popular children's toy.
It has been recalled, because the dots are poisonous when ingested.
" The coating on the beads that causes the beads to stick to each other when water is added, contains a chemical that turns toxic when ingested.
Children who swallow large quantities can become unconscious, develop respiratory depression, or have seizures. Consumers with Aqua Dots should immediately remove the beads from children and contact Spin Master´s customer service department at:
(800) 622-8339
BETWEEN 9 A.M. AND 6 P.M. ET, MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY TO ARRANGE TO RECEIVE REFORMULATED REPLACEMENT BEADS OR AN ITEM OF SIMILAR VALUE.
Not travel related, but I think that it is important,
Aqua Dots is a very popular children's toy.
It has been recalled, because the dots are poisonous when ingested.
" The coating on the beads that causes the beads to stick to each other when water is added, contains a chemical that turns toxic when ingested.
Children who swallow large quantities can become unconscious, develop respiratory depression, or have seizures. Consumers with Aqua Dots should immediately remove the beads from children and contact Spin Master´s customer service department at:
(800) 622-8339
BETWEEN 9 A.M. AND 6 P.M. ET, MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY TO ARRANGE TO RECEIVE REFORMULATED REPLACEMENT BEADS OR AN ITEM OF SIMILAR VALUE.
#7
Original Poster
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,699
Likes: 0
>Why are they being ingested?
The toy is clearly for those over 3...<
Because little kids put stuff in their mouths.
How were parents to know that the dots were poisonous?
In succeeding reports, it turns out that the dots weren't supposed to be coated with 1,4-butanediol.
They were supposed to be coated with 1,5-pentanediol. This stuff is used in ink-jet printers.
The safety sheets on this compound say that it is a skin, eye, nose and lung irritant.
What were these people thinking?
The toy is clearly for those over 3...<
Because little kids put stuff in their mouths.
How were parents to know that the dots were poisonous?
In succeeding reports, it turns out that the dots weren't supposed to be coated with 1,4-butanediol.
They were supposed to be coated with 1,5-pentanediol. This stuff is used in ink-jet printers.
The safety sheets on this compound say that it is a skin, eye, nose and lung irritant.
What were these people thinking?
Trending Topics
#8

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,085
Likes: 0
Some children put things in their mouths. My twelve year old is bright and usually appears fairly normal, but has mild ASD, and does put stuff in his mouth. I wouldn't worry about him choking, and he wouldn't try something he expected to be toxic (he's capable of checking for the astm-d label himself), but little round plastic beads? Yum! We tossed his room and checked all his toys in case he had been given any we weren't aware of. Also made sure he knew about the recall, and that the coating was toxic and could cause a coma. Of course he then had medical questions that I couldn't answer, but the real point is that even children over three can be at risk from something like this.
#9
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,050
Likes: 0
Aqua Dots are arranged into a design, then wetted so they stick together. Usually, a spray of water is all that's needed. But somtimes a couple of dots don't stick right, perhaps they didn't get sprayed enough. It's natural for a kid to lick the stray bead or two to wet it. A kid might even try using saliva instead of spraying them.
#11
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 36,842
Likes: 0
This is a serious issue, but I'm unclear of how dangerous they really are. On TV they showed a little boy who had gotten very ill from them, but when they talked with the doctor, the doctor was talking about how the kid kept vomitting up dozens and dozens of these beads. I understand why he got so sick. But what happens if a kid licks just one? Anything? If he accidentally swallows just one? A problem?
Don't get me wrong, I DO think they should be pulled and it is a terrible thing, but no one seems very good at telling us HOW MUCH danger there is here.
Don't get me wrong, I DO think they should be pulled and it is a terrible thing, but no one seems very good at telling us HOW MUCH danger there is here.
#12

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,085
Likes: 0
They may not really know. I remember reading an article in the Times about GHB use a couple of years ago, and I think that one of the things that made it so dangerous is that individuals have extremely varying reactions to the same amount, therefore making it nearly impossible to calculate a safe dose.




