NYC: Chicago vs Hairspray
#5
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
I've seen them both and you can't go wrong with either. They are very different types of shows, and it depends on your tastes. My husband and I loved Chicago ... we thought Hairspray was just OK. That's more a reflection of our tastes though than the quality of the show.
#6
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 989
Likes: 0
Forgive me if you already know this...but if you're not familiar with the stage version of Chicago, please be aware that it is very different from the recent movie. The design is very minimalist (more of a "black box" type of show), whereas the movie is more literal, with lots of costumes and scenery.
Both shows are great, but provide very different theatrical experiences. Hopefully this will help you judge what your group will enjoy!
Both shows are great, but provide very different theatrical experiences. Hopefully this will help you judge what your group will enjoy!
Trending Topics
#8
Original Poster
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Well Bardo, I'm afraid I am in the over 30 age group, I hate to admit!
I really appreciate the insight into how different Chicago the play is from the movie, which I loved!
From the sound of it, we couldn't go wrong and it's a toss up!
Thanks!
I really appreciate the insight into how different Chicago the play is from the movie, which I loved!
From the sound of it, we couldn't go wrong and it's a toss up!
Thanks!
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
I agree they are both winners. I'd make the decision by asking yourself this, "do we want to see big and splashy? Do we want to see major costumes and scenery in addition to great singing, dancing, and acting?" If the answer to either of these is yes then do Hairspray. If neither of these make much difference to you, toss a coin.




