Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > United States
Reload this Page >

Gay days at Dollywood

Search

Gay days at Dollywood

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 30th, 2007 | 10:15 AM
  #41  
iceeu2
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Perhaps the OP is not a techie and does not know about google.

And, the OP never ever mentioned holding hands or giving their sweetie a kiss. So, what does that have to do with the price of eggs in China?
 
Old May 30th, 2007 | 10:19 AM
  #42  
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,647
Likes: 0
your non answer is an answer. And no I don't have a problem with straight couples holding hands and I don't have a problem with gay couples sharing kisses.

I have a problem with people who want to attack somebody because they may not want to expose their family to a gay environment for any reason.

frank_and_beans is offline  
Old May 30th, 2007 | 10:21 AM
  #43  
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,052
Likes: 0
The OP asked a question about an "overtly gay situation". All you people had to say was that most gay people will not act any more overtly sexual than the other thousands of hetrosexual people that will be there that day, instead of calling him names and putting words in his mouth.
travelbug44 is offline  
Old May 30th, 2007 | 10:22 AM
  #44  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 35,485
Likes: 3
franks and beans - what "lifestyle" don't you approve of, really? I'd venture that many gays have a "lifestyle" that is probably similar to yours - working, supporting themselves and/or a family, maintaining a household, etc.

Or is it really not the lifestyle to which you object but something a little more basic?
tom42 is offline  
Old May 30th, 2007 | 10:24 AM
  #45  
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 53,092
Likes: 37
You should be very, very wary, gandb7. Homosexuality is contagious. There will be proselytizers aplenty, just waiting to invade families like yours. There's even the possibility that a member of your family might not recognize the insidious character of Those People.
LucieV is offline  
Old May 30th, 2007 | 10:27 AM
  #46  
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,647
Likes: 0
tom, how about reading a bit first...

I never said I don't approve of a gay lifestyle. I may or may not, that is not the point.

I came to the defense of a person who was being attacked because he/she was concerned about exposing their family to a situation that he/she may not feel is appropriate.
frank_and_beans is offline  
Old May 30th, 2007 | 10:28 AM
  #47  
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,226
Likes: 0
F&B, instead of your usual inflammatory comments, perhaps you could go back and read my posts to this thread.

Please share where I have "attacked" the OP or anyone. From the beginning, I have shared information that will be helpful to the OP if seeing a minority of red Tshirts in the park is offensive in any way.

Thank you for answering my question. If I understood you correctly, you would not be offended if you saw a gay couple hold hands or share a quick kiss.

The OP asked about "overtly gay situation". My best guess (I have not been to Out in the Park) is that there will be just gay families wearing red Tshirts and enjoying the park. My guess is that the most "overtly" gay situation would be a couple holding hands or sharing a quick kiss.

And, based on my original post, the OP can avoid the situation altogether by doing Dollywood on Sunday.

Looking forward to your finding my "attack" on the OP.
starrsville is offline  
Old May 30th, 2007 | 10:32 AM
  #48  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,242
Likes: 0
Labeling someone a homophobe may not be an attack, but it's not particularly friendly either. Especially when you don't know if it's accurate or not.
beachbum is offline  
Old May 30th, 2007 | 10:35 AM
  #49  
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,647
Likes: 0
starrs, maybe not you (and I never called you out specifically except to ask my question)

Dukey: "And I cannot believe how unnecessarily PREJUDICED the OP is being, OK? And no, I don't like it and yes I will continue to be "UNKIND" to those people who are"

GoT: "I'm with Dukey on this one."
frank_and_beans is offline  
Old May 30th, 2007 | 10:37 AM
  #50  
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 53,092
Likes: 37
The OP knew full well that his/her post was specious. If the post had expressed concern about exposing one's family to miscegenation or born-again Christians or members of the Flat Earth Society, it'd be just as open to sarcastic responses.
LucieV is offline  
Old May 30th, 2007 | 10:38 AM
  #51  
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 53,092
Likes: 37
And I'm with Dukey and GoT on this one. All the way, José.
LucieV is offline  
Old May 30th, 2007 | 10:39 AM
  #52  
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,647
Likes: 0
Oh Lucie, how foolish you are...

"I would choose not to expose my family to born again Christians"

The OP would have gotten about 350 posts congratulating her on her 'wise' concern.
frank_and_beans is offline  
Old May 30th, 2007 | 10:40 AM
  #53  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 35,485
Likes: 3
Just reading between the lines frank. I apologize if I was wrong but be real - it's not lifestyles that people disapprove of, it's sex between two adults who are the same sex.
tom42 is offline  
Old May 30th, 2007 | 10:40 AM
  #54  
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,226
Likes: 0
beachbum, if that was directed to me, I didn't label anyone a homophobe - or anything else.

I just thought the excerpt I posted was amusing. Yes, contradictory too. I think that poster used a layman's definition of what they were saying they weren't. Just my opinion about gmoney's post - not the OP's.

Not that anyone cares, but I often give a heads-up on this board to folks traveling to Ptown that they may see things they may not want their family to see. I do it respectfully and candidly - and have never encountered any negative feedback for doing so. I understand the OP's concern and have addressed this OP respectfully and candidly.

F&B's timing and comments on this thread are very interesting - and typical.
starrsville is offline  
Old May 30th, 2007 | 10:43 AM
  #55  
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,647
Likes: 0
starrs, explain the timing comment?
frank_and_beans is offline  
Old May 30th, 2007 | 10:43 AM
  #56  
iceeu2
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Yeah, right on LucieV. Click on the OP's name and see what a crap disturber she is. Wow, she asks questions about travel and the places she wants to go. Imagine that! The nerve of her stirring up trouble by phrasing a question so she could be pounded by "not nice" people.
 
Old May 30th, 2007 | 10:43 AM
  #57  
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,226
Likes: 0
Public Service Announcement -
You will see Tshirts worn by born again Christians and church groups of all types worn in Dollywood on ANY day the park is open!

There can easily be 3000 religious Tshirts worn in Dollywood at any given time.
starrsville is offline  
Old May 30th, 2007 | 10:45 AM
  #58  
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,647
Likes: 0
what does that have to do with anything?
frank_and_beans is offline  
Old May 30th, 2007 | 10:51 AM
  #59  
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,226
Likes: 0
F&B, you aren't being very logical here -

Author: frank_and_beans
Date: 05/30/2007, 02:35 pm
starrs, maybe not you (and I never called you out specifically except to ask my question

Who was your 2:19 comment directed to then?
starrsville is offline  
Old May 30th, 2007 | 10:51 AM
  #60  
GoTravel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Fortunately this thread will be zapped shortly.

I think this is the time of day the editors clean house.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
voredibo
United States
0
Nov 4th, 2017 07:33 AM
venturesome4
Asia
7
Dec 31st, 2014 01:13 AM
1travelbug
United States
8
Mar 24th, 2010 06:52 PM
aussiedreamer
United States
3
Sep 2nd, 2009 03:33 PM
Tansy
United States
29
Mar 25th, 2004 07:17 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -