Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > United States
Reload this Page >

Cross-country roadtrip in Oct/Nov. SUV or full-size?

Cross-country roadtrip in Oct/Nov. SUV or full-size?

Old Oct 2nd, 2015, 11:18 AM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cross-country roadtrip in Oct/Nov. SUV or full-size?

Hi, folks.

New to the community. My wife and I are gearing up for a late fall roadtrip around country, starting in DC, driving to Boulder and then up to Idaho and Washington, back down through Oregon and California on the way to Arizona and Texas, and back up to DC from there (roughly 8k total over 1.5 months). We're leaving on October 18th (planning to return Nov.30th), so I'm wondering what kind of vehicle you'd recommend we rent. We're trying to decide between an SUV (2WD or 4WD?) or a full-sized car. We're going to hit the NW before it get too cold, and try to reach there by the end of the first week of November (2nd week at the latest). My wife still wants to take her BMW (328xi), but I'm trying to talk her out of it (maintenance/depreciation costs + possible weather). Would appreciate any help and/or insights you have to offer! Cheers!
delmario is offline  
Old Oct 2nd, 2015, 12:01 PM
  #2  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, many rental companies limit you to a 30 day period. I think that has something to do with the lease/rental deals they have, but you might find a company that will rent to you for the 45 days you are thinking of going. In any case, make sure it is a large enough company to have places to give you help if something goes wrong with the car along the route.

If you haven't driven a 4WD SUV, I can't see the advantage of renting one. There are some roads that do require either 4WD or chains during snow storms, but again if you haven't driven in snow with a 4WD then don't. Also some rental companies do not allow chains.

As to the costs of maintenance/depreciation, well you will need to change the oil on the rental and have you compared the costs of the rental to those costs?

I'm inclined to side with your wife. You'll be driving a car you know, and you should just check into a hotel/motel if the weather is so bad that you fear driving - which you should do with the rental in any case.

Of course, you might look more manly in a SUV, but............

Have a great trip in either case.
emalloy is offline  
Old Oct 2nd, 2015, 12:12 PM
  #3  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 11,501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds like a fun trip! A regular car should be fine, as it's unlikely you'd hit snow or ice that time of year.

Lee Ann
ElendilPickle is offline  
Old Oct 2nd, 2015, 12:57 PM
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,115
Received 77 Likes on 7 Posts
I prefer SUVs for this kind of trip mainly because the visibility is so much better given the higher seating position than in a passenger car. The 2WD v. 4WD issue is less important to me; if you were planning to take roads where early snow is a possibility (e.g. high passes in the Rockies or maybe Mt. Rainier) then maybe the 4WD or AWD option might be better.
Gardyloo is offline  
Old Oct 2nd, 2015, 04:11 PM
  #5  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 57,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BMWs are truly dreadful in ice/sleet and snow which you are likely to hit at least some of in the mountains.

There is no way you could pay me to take a car like that cross country with a strong potential for winter weather. (I have a friend with the same car and he leaves it in the garage even in heavy rain - it just won't hold the road.)
nytraveler is offline  
Old Oct 2nd, 2015, 04:38 PM
  #6  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 12,629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Depends on what stuff you're traveling with and where and how many stops you're going to make. An SUV sort of exposes all your luggage and pegs you as tourists....if you're making three-hour stops to take hikes or whatever you may not want to leave a sitting-duck of a vehicle in a remote parking lot etc. A trunk is a little more secure if you can fit everything in there.

Also a car lies lower if you have to drive into a ditch to sit out a tornado.
clarkgriswold is offline  
Old Oct 3rd, 2015, 01:14 AM
  #7  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 22,534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unless cost is of no concern, I would take a car you own. It sounds like you are on no specific schedule, so if you hit bad weather, you can just hole up somewhere for a day or so. This from the perspective of someone who insists on an SUV in Boston winters - but I am an RN and have to be on the road in bad weather. Most of the country handles snow removal far more efficiently than DC.
gail is offline  
Old Oct 3rd, 2015, 02:24 AM
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Take your own car. Why on earth wouldn't you. Surely you have driven it in snow and sleet in DC at some point.
As mentioned, IF there is snow in the west, they are good about getting it off the highways. If you needed to stay put somewhere for an extra day, it would be a fun snow day.

I have to laugh a at the suggestion that you would change the oil on a rental car!!
Gretchen is offline  
Old Oct 3rd, 2015, 06:20 AM
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,115
Received 77 Likes on 7 Posts
My wife still wants to take her BMW (328xi), but I'm trying to talk her out of it (maintenance/depreciation costs + possible weather).

Just looked over this line - surprised I missed it yesterday, since I used to own a 328xi. That's an AWD car and a superb car for a road trip like this.

Unlike my previous 2WD Bimmer, which was indeed a POS in the snow and ice, my 328xi was a champ. Not that I had to use it much; here in Seattle it snows rarely and our other car was a 4WD Escape, older and shabbier, so it was the preferred vehicle given it's the other drivers I worry about, having won my winter driving spurs after many years of living in Alaska.

A month and a half rental of a vehicle, be it a standard car or an SUV, is going to cost an arm and a leg. I find it hard to imagine the costs of using your wife's car would even come close, and as for depreciation, that will occur whether you're driving the car or not.

Plus, the threat of snowy or icy conditions at that time of year, given your route, is low enough that I'd discount the risk almost in its entirety. And if you DO encounter wintry conditions, well, with a month and a half, just sit it out for a day, or detour around it.

So I'm changing my vote. Take the Bimmer, load up with a lot of road music, and press the right pedal. Hard.
Gardyloo is offline  
Old Oct 6th, 2015, 09:23 AM
  #10  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You're all awesome! Thank you! Read this over with her and she gave me the eye and the "I told you so." We're going to take her car. Just a matter of planning out the route now. Have any of you driven from the eastcoast to Boulder before? If so, any suggestions for stops along the way? I'm told KC is a must. We're budgeting 4-5 days for that leg of our trip.
delmario is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hworth1976
Europe
16
Sep 13th, 2015 04:13 AM
librarychica85
United States
6
Feb 27th, 2015 03:42 AM
john_and_lisa
United States
11
Aug 2nd, 2007 06:38 AM
Nicol
Europe
27
Feb 8th, 2006 02:35 AM
atimmons
Europe
4
Dec 21st, 2003 06:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell My Personal Information