Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > United States
Reload this Page >

Chicago or St Louis?

Search

Chicago or St Louis?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 9th, 2002 | 08:34 PM
  #41  
justme
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The blue waters of Lake Michigan vs the muddy Mississippi??? I'm sorry, but my vote goes to Chicago. We were surprised on our first visit to find how clean a city it is. Navy Pier is a blast. The list of attractions for the older children is well documented above. I might also add the Imax Theater on Navy Pier, FAO Schwartz, FAO Schweetz, The Lego Store. Depending when you're heading out, there's the annual Halloween Festival beginning mid-October. There's also a Six Flags nearby.

Have fun wherever you decide
 
Old Sep 10th, 2002 | 05:17 AM
  #42  
Penny
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Chicago is one of our favorite places to take our 2 children. The Aquarium is an absolute favorite after multiple visits. Stay downtown - we like the Embassy Suites for the space, breakfasts and pool. You can walk all over and never feel unsafe.
 
Old Sep 10th, 2002 | 05:29 AM
  #43  
Speedbump
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
We love St. Louis. The Arch and the City Museum are a must. The Imax theater and the Planetarium are really fun. The Zoo is a day event. My kids love it. I understand they just added a whole new section to it. Grants Farm is a wonderful attraction for young kids.
 
Old Sep 10th, 2002 | 05:43 AM
  #44  
xxx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
St. Louis!!!!!!!!!!!!
Chicago is dirty and full of homeless people. Where do they all go when it gets cold?
 
Old Oct 10th, 2002 | 07:46 PM
  #45  
dkny
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
St. Louis?! Are you joking?! It's almost unfortunate the Arch is in St. Louis because I can't think of any other reason to visit.
 
Old Oct 10th, 2002 | 08:13 PM
  #46  
WhySF?
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
It looks like Chicago has become the midwest version of San Francisco. Dirty, cold and full of homeless people. Are all the cities that were once great going down the tubes? (San Francisco, Chicago, Boston, Seattle). It really is a shame. I guess people have realized that many places are overrated and that in these times, it's important to think about our families. Lana, don't hurt your family by taking them to Chicago. Maybe if they clean it up, it will be better one day.

P.S. Are Willie Brown and Richard Daley in on this together? It's sad to see what's happened to some great cities.
 
Old Oct 11th, 2002 | 04:19 AM
  #47  
Girl
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
'Don't hurt your children by taking them to Chicago'? I can't belive you said that. Chicago is an amazing city! I tood my son there when he was 5 and we had a blast. It is amazingly clean considering it's a huge city. Sure there's a lot of traffic but there is also a great public transportation system. The downtown area is wonderful and there's so much for families to do. I would suggest though, that you take a trip in summer so that you'll be able to take advantage of the INCREDIBLE beaches! I didn't know that Lake Michigan could be so clean and clear. I can't say enough about this city. I hope you have a good trip - wherever you end up.
 
Old Oct 11th, 2002 | 06:29 AM
  #48  
Lifelong
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I can't believe someone says Chicago has gone downhill. I'm no Mayor Daley fan, but that just is not factual. I was there. The 60's and 70's saw much of the real Chicago deteriorate. The last 10 years have seen more re-building, re-habbing, gentrifying and extreme improvement in nearly every neighborhood and precinct. The tourist part is so very small in comparison to all of Chicago proper. Regardless, the homeless, crime, and grime are all tremendously better than 20 years ago.

As a tourist, the only issue you may find fault with is the traffic all over, and the parking in particular for most of the areas you would attend. Access traffic and commutes are the worst I've ever see. And much of what Chicago has to offer is NOT public transportation friendly- and that includes tons of great stuff that is west or south.
 
Old Oct 11th, 2002 | 06:36 AM
  #49  
xxx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Do you have to even ask? Chicago.
 
Old Oct 11th, 2002 | 06:39 AM
  #50  
xx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I try to respect other's opinions, but I have to say, this post has floored me more than any other post I've read on these boards. St. Louis over Chicago?? You have to be kidding me! Chicago is beautiful, clean, can't imagine anyone thinking it's dirty. Did you vacation in the projects?? So much to do and the people are very friendly.
 
Old Oct 11th, 2002 | 01:29 PM
  #51  
patg
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Lana, I live in Chicago and am raising my kids there. There is a lot to do and you won't be disappointed, BUT, navigating traffic, etc., with four kids and two strollers is going to give you a headache. It is also quite expensive.

St. Louis has a lot for the little ones (my kids loved the City Museum and zoo) and it is much easier to get around in with a car. I would suggest taking this trip to St. Louis, and waiting a few years for Chicago.
 
Old Oct 11th, 2002 | 01:30 PM
  #52  
patg
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Forgot to add that St. Louis figures to be about 10 degrees warmer than Chicago in mid-fall. It makes a big difference!
 
Old Oct 11th, 2002 | 01:34 PM
  #53  
x
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
St.louis
 
Old Oct 12th, 2002 | 04:32 AM
  #54  
Dan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
No contest, Chicago. The majority of people who are picking St. Louis must have St. Louis ties. Its like comparing Elvis to an Elvis impersonator.
 
Old Oct 12th, 2002 | 04:37 AM
  #55  
Mike
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I travelled to St. Louis a couple of years ago to see a Bruce Springsteen concert. Even on a sunny, blue sky day, it was probably the least appealing large city I've ever been to. I found Indianpolis to be much more enjoyable. Go Chicago. This is so obvious I can't believe were even talking about it.
 
Old Oct 12th, 2002 | 04:55 AM
  #56  
Mark
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
St. Louis.
 
Old Oct 22nd, 2002 | 05:03 PM
  #57  
ttt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
topping
 
Old Oct 22nd, 2002 | 07:17 PM
  #58  
M
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Chicago for sure! The city has so much to offer, culture (and the person who said no culture in that city has to be kidding), great food, shopping and friendly people esp. for a city of its size! For the comment about the number of homeless people, it is a sad fact that there are homeless people in almost ever major large US city.
I think Chicago is a very clean, fun and one of the best cities in the US and if not the world for sure.
St. Louis, nice I guess, but you can go there another time....
 
Old Dec 1st, 2002 | 07:22 AM
  #59  
Alex
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I live in St. Louis, but have been to CHI maybe 30 times in my life, once for several weeks. My friends live in CHI. If you want a "downtown" nightlife vacation, go to Chicago. If you don't mind driving a bit and want more of a family-uncrowded vacation, go to STL.

Both have a zoo, sports, restaurants, shopping, etc. Everytime I go to CHI, it's STL * 10 for me.. same crap, but bigger and more of it.

The reality: both cities are comparable. But St. Louis is less hurried and rushed, without the crazy taxi drivers, the noise and night, and high crime rates. Yes, with more people comes more crime.
 
Old Dec 1st, 2002 | 08:45 AM
  #60  
Nancy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Chicago is highly reccomended! Natual History Museum Science & industry Museum- Something for all ages. Two zoos, Brookfield & lincoln park- Sears Tower-John Hancock- The art Insitute all located close together. Chicago is my pick!
 


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -