Jeff: You are a bore. I can think of at least half a dozen other forums you could've gone to, at other websites, and gotten twice the number of responses in less than a day by simply posting something "controversial" and saying you've got a bet going on the number of responses you'll get. In fact, it could've been a topic you're actually interested in. In other words, you could've been honest and perhaps even learned something. Imagine.

No, people, the whole thread wasn't a hoax - only Jeff's message. Everyone (or just about everyone) gave honest answers, though some were more than helpful than others. There were some very good pieces of advice which may prove to be useful to some people that read these messages. I know I picked up some helpful tips for when I take my 11 month old to Florida next week. One question, how do you know that Ruth tried sending everyone personal emails? She only mentioned doing so once, to Pauline. Very interesting.

Yeah, I do get it. But, call me a sheep or call me naive, but I still have faith that there are honest, decent people out there. Obviously, you don't fall into that category. However, I AM pleased to have provided you with another afternoon of laughter at other people's expense. I hope that if/when you have children, you teach them to treat people better.

Ilisa, how do you know that every post here was "legitimate"? You can only speak for yourself. I can assure you that many were not.

Ruth, do you have the word "victim" tatooed on your forehead or something? You're incapable of posting anything without judgments and name-calling. Go ahead, post another self defensive, self pitying diatribe, and be sure to lecture everyone else. *Yawn*

Jeff buddy, you should have bet more money!!

Does anyone else think that Jeff is a loser? Why is a 20 year old college kid in southern California doing this?

Hey, the more reponses we add to this thread, the more satisfaction Jeff will get. (Be glad you're not his friend and have to hear him boasting about his "grand" achievement.) Maybe somebody should start their own thread re this topic--or better yet, let it drop. (This is, after, a travel forum.)

Well, Truth, if YOU said it, it must be so! Guess it takes one to know one, huh?

Now Ruth, stop posting incognito here as "Truth" (Ruth, Truth?) and take your lumps! *snicker*

The self righteous are SO ridiculous. It's hilariious.

I don't know when I've laughed so hard! This post gets funnier all the time! Jeff, you stuck a pin into some overinflated egos here and really set them off! They take themselves way too seriously to be able to handle it.

I ought to send you another twenty bucks just for the laugh. Thanks.

P.S. Settle down there "T/Ruth" . hehehehe

OK, people, perhaps not all posts were legitimate (such as yours?). However, I know the most useful ones are, such as Ruth's. She happens to be a good friend of mine - you should be so fortunate to have a person like her in your life. People like Dan Woodlief are regulars on this forum and have nothing but useful and helpful information to give. The ones that are not legitimate, in all likelihood, are those who don't have the courage to use their own names.

Oh how it wish it were me!! I for one have not laughed so hard in weeks. Thank you, "Truth", for your post.

Sorry, guys, if the "Truth" hurts. I can take anything you can dish out - I just consider the source, and then get on with my life. Why don't you try it yourselves?

Old Ruth is someone who just HAS to have the last word, isn't she? Keep on baiting her and she keeps coming right on back!

You're letting total strangers rile you up, manipulate and control your emotions and responses, and it's pretty darn funny. See, people ARE sheep! You lead, they follow.

I am SO RELIEVED to know that Ruth's son DID get to go visit for her mother's two surgeries and that Ruth's son DID get to see his 92 and 96 year old grandparents on Australia after all on Xmas eve!!!! I had been SO DAMN WORRIED about where Ruth and son were on Xmas that now I can finally sleep well knowing they were on a plane with only 8 other people (I think the other 260 jumped off when they saw Ruth and son coming down the aisle). Now what is that little darlings name and his favorite toy and his favorite TV show? I'm sure everyone is dying to know this Ruth.

Ruth/Truth/Ilisa:

Hello, are you there? We all know you're one and the same person (and who knows how many others), no sense hiding any more! Oh wait. You're not at work right now are you, posting messages on your employer's dime! Guess we'll hear from you FIRST THING on Monday!

Baaaaaaaahh!

I wouldn't doubt it People. Ruth will no doubt fill us in on her weekend events come Monday when she's busy at work

Ilisa -
Rest assured I am a legitimate! Is Ruth's son?

OK OK THAT didn't work....I thought if I posted under jeff's name, and said this was just a joke it would STOP this tread..but it seems to have a life of its own,,,(sorry Jeff, slap me)..
Although, I am a little surprized that not ONE person who posted after suggested that MY post was the hoax..
To you Martha, 84 huh? I just pray that I'm as full of spunk as you at 84.
Hang in there!!!!

I think the hoax is Ruth and her so called child. I don't believe there is a Ruth cause if there was she would have told us what the kid wore today to school by now.

I was suspicious that the one who posted as 'Jeff Court' a few messages-up, claiming to be the UCLA senior who started this as a hoax was the one who was an imposter. Now it looks as though this has been confirmed, although we can never know, as ANYONE can CLAIM to be ANYTHING or ANYONE here.

Didn't anyone else notice that the original poster was 'Jeff/Court', and the imposter was 'Jeff Court'?