armpit of each state?
#22
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,161
Likes: 0
rjw, It figures that someone would chime in with the racist comment. This is the US people here speak English people who come here should make the effort to learn the language. To me it is racist to come to this country and expect everyone to adapt to you and not learn to adapt to the country you are in. This comes from a bad experience I had in Miami when my car broke down and I had a difficult time finding anyone to help me that could speak english. Even the police officer could barely. Besides the fact that it has the highest crime rate in FL. the most corrupt govt. and except for the beach area is basically an "armpit". Get off your high horse.
#24
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
I travel a bit around the USA and Miami does seem as if a passport is needed to get around. I tried a few local restaurant that was popular with the locals and go absolutely no help to ordering since English was not the fashion. Ended up at a restaurant that catered to a cruise ship crew from the Philippines. A great group of people. Made an unpleasant experience pleasant and they weren't from the USA. I'll go back again but will stay in South Beach and bus over to Miami.
#26
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,379
Likes: 0
Sorry if I'm touchy, but I still have relatives that ONLY speak French-- and our family has been here since before the American Revolution. Fact is: The United States does NOT have an official language. English is the language of the government and the vast majority of the people, yes, but the country has never adopted an official language.
Now, back to armpits of each state: I second the vote for Fresno, CA. However, Blythe (on the CA/AZ border) is pretty nasty too....
Now, back to armpits of each state: I second the vote for Fresno, CA. However, Blythe (on the CA/AZ border) is pretty nasty too....
#27
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
I know this is a little off topic, but I was surprised that English is not the official language of the US. I found these statistics and thought I would share them
"With a margin for error of plus-or-minus 3.1 percent, key findings from the Omnibus survey of 1,000 nationwide registered voters include:
-- Eighty-four percent of respondents favored making English the official language of the United States and 11 percent opposed.
There is intensity in the data with 73 percent of voters saying they strongly favored making English the official language.
-- Men are five times more likely than women to favor making English the official language.
-- Among party lines, 89 percent of Republicans favor making English the official language, while 80 percent of Independent and Democrat voters favors such legislation."
It seems like the majority does agree that English should be the national language and I completely agree.
rjw- I am not posting this to try to offend or insult you. I understand your opinion on the matter and wanted to share mine.
Oh, btw, my vote for the armpit of Texas is Lubbock- flat, no grass, terrible dust storms.
"With a margin for error of plus-or-minus 3.1 percent, key findings from the Omnibus survey of 1,000 nationwide registered voters include:
-- Eighty-four percent of respondents favored making English the official language of the United States and 11 percent opposed.
There is intensity in the data with 73 percent of voters saying they strongly favored making English the official language.
-- Men are five times more likely than women to favor making English the official language.
-- Among party lines, 89 percent of Republicans favor making English the official language, while 80 percent of Independent and Democrat voters favors such legislation."
It seems like the majority does agree that English should be the national language and I completely agree.
rjw- I am not posting this to try to offend or insult you. I understand your opinion on the matter and wanted to share mine.
Oh, btw, my vote for the armpit of Texas is Lubbock- flat, no grass, terrible dust storms.
#28
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,379
Likes: 0
mercedes: The data don't surprise me. All I'm saying is: Saying that a particular place is an "armpit" because there is a large percentage of citizens who don't speak English is a bit ridiculous. Citing high crime stats-- now that's a stronger argument, isn't it?
Now, a plasticky, nasty, steamy pile of urban sprawl without redeeming natural beauty-- that qualifies a place as an "armpit", in my eyes. I can think of a few....
Now, a plasticky, nasty, steamy pile of urban sprawl without redeeming natural beauty-- that qualifies a place as an "armpit", in my eyes. I can think of a few....
#31
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
John: I saw few Native Americans in Hardin the girls in the DQ were blonde and blue eyed, since DH is Cherokee, I doubt I would down the Native American people.
I must also agree with the Crotch comment, not because of who resided there but it is a dinky little town with watermelons everywhere, I hate watermelon.
Baltimore the pit of all.
I must also agree with the Crotch comment, not because of who resided there but it is a dinky little town with watermelons everywhere, I hate watermelon.
Baltimore the pit of all.
#37
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
J_Correa:
Hate to disagree with you, but the
absolute, undisputed armpit of California is
ALVISO, which is part of the GREATER SAN JOSE area
Alviso is the official and unofficial dump site at the southern end of San Francisco Bay. On a good day, you can SMELL Alviso before you have even arrived! On a bad day, well, on a bad day, fainting from the smell is a wonderful option! The overwhelming stench permeates into adjoining communities...

Fresno used to be just like any other country town in the Central Valley. Too bad it's got ugly urban sprawl and high crime. But comes in a distinct second to Alviso!
Yes, Marilyn, Firebaugh used to be REALLY bad - in them ole days...





