Variations of this question have probably been beaten to death; I ask your indulgence

Intended use is tromping thru europe for 4 months. Will have large (2100 cubic inch) daypack as carry-on. The large wheeled suitcase will be checked on planes and carried aboard trains.

Large suitcase choices-

Eagle Creek "Expandable 26"
26 x 17 x 10 (53" total)
weight: under 10 lbs
stiff on back & 2 ends; soft & floppy other 3 sides.
price: $200-ish

Generic wheeled from Target Dept store
27 x 17 x 11 inch (55" total)
weight: 13-14 lbs
stiff on all 6 sides.
price $80

Because of the floppy 3 sides, lighter weight, and 2" less overall size, the Eagle Creek *FEELS* a lot smaller and easier to handle. This would be a plus on trains, general walking around, and "mushing" the case into tighter spots.

Potential downside-- the 3 floppy sides and perhaps thinner fabric of the Eagle Creek might provide less protection to contents.

Has the seemingly lighter construction of the Eagle Creeks ever caused a problem or been a liability?? Any experiences or comments?

note- the price difference is secondary and not the primary decision point.

TIA

Well, I'll jump right in with the inevitable (on these boards) reply: Why on earth do you want such a huge suitcase in the first place?

"Why on earth do you want such a huge suitcase in the first place?"

That wasn't my inquiry. Let's just take as a "given" that I want a case of 50-55 inches overall dimension.

tom, you left yourself open for that query when you asked, "Any experiences or comments?" Indeed, most likely you will come to loathe either of them after lugging them about for 4 months.

It sounds to me like the Eagle Creek is the better choice; it has several advantages, the brand does have a good reputation, and you shouldn't count on the "stiff" sides of the other one to protect your things.

I like stiff more then soft. For whatever reason you can think of...

Ooopsss

Welcome back, Faina!