Just a word of warning about your carry-on
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 12,820
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just a word of warning about your carry-on
The first time I tested positive for explosive residue, I was amazed. The TSA woman said it was probably glycerin that set off the the detection system. She had to check everything in my carry-on. So I looked to see which among my cosmetics and lotions contained glycerin, but only one did, and I removed it from my carry-on. The hangup wasn't a problem because I had plenty of time before my flight.
This doesn't happen at every flight I take, but it can be a problem when it does.
A couple of years later, it happened again. I thought I had removed everything containing glycerin, but the alarm went off at Frankfurt, when I was already late for my plane. The Frankfurt security people checked EVERYTHING. They even made me open up my kindle so they could see that it was not a fiendish device. A shuttle to my flight was waiting for me, as I was being checked out. I was really embarrassed at holding up this whole busload of people.
This morning, I idly checked my moisturizer/sunscreen and discovered it contained glycerin, as did my mousse. I'd never taken either on a trip to Europe, so I was glad I'd checked.
Do my advice is to check every lotion, liquid, or cream to see if it contains glycerin.
This doesn't happen at every flight I take, but it can be a problem when it does.
A couple of years later, it happened again. I thought I had removed everything containing glycerin, but the alarm went off at Frankfurt, when I was already late for my plane. The Frankfurt security people checked EVERYTHING. They even made me open up my kindle so they could see that it was not a fiendish device. A shuttle to my flight was waiting for me, as I was being checked out. I was really embarrassed at holding up this whole busload of people.
This morning, I idly checked my moisturizer/sunscreen and discovered it contained glycerin, as did my mousse. I'd never taken either on a trip to Europe, so I was glad I'd checked.
Do my advice is to check every lotion, liquid, or cream to see if it contains glycerin.
#5
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 34,863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You sure have bad luck considering the millions of people who go through those screeners with ingredients with glycerin. I agree with Dukey, I don't think this is because you were carrying glycerin inside it. But it isn't clear if the alarm went off from you going through the scanner or your luggage? Because if you had jut used soap or lotion on your hands, and then went through, maybe that could do it. I don't do that. And then if your hands go off, I could see why they'd have to check your luggage.
I carry something with glycerin in it most of the time and it has never set the screener off (Aquaphor).
I carry something with glycerin in it most of the time and it has never set the screener off (Aquaphor).
#7
Do you get patted down and hands swiped? Some people that take nitroglycerin tablets will alarm or if you have been around yard chemicals. It could be their machine was just dirty. I don't worry about it anymore. Just don't put a ton of lotion on your hands before going through security. Shoes alarm if people have been walking on golf courses.
I am flying Thursday, first time since they are increasing the pat down and making it more intimate. Anyone had that done yet?
I am flying Thursday, first time since they are increasing the pat down and making it more intimate. Anyone had that done yet?
#8
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"...increasing the pat down and making it more intimate. Anyone had that done yet?..."
Oh yes, and how! I have flannel-lined pants with cargo pockets, and the pants are thicker than average and the velcro flaps of the pockets add to the thickness - alarms go off and normally I flap the flaps open to show that they're just flaps, not "things" I carry.
But now, the thickness of those pants lights up their obviously recalibrated scanner image (you know, the screen where you see what the TSA person sees and goes by), in the crotch and elsewhere - not a pat-down but a slow inch-by-inch grope resulted, three times in the last couple of months. I even had to open the belt and flies and turn the top of the pants inside out to show that I had nothing strapped around my waist. Quite a show!
Maybe I'll start wearing boxer shorts and drop my pants altogether so they can go on the conveyor belt. With a bit of luck I'll get famous on YouTube, you never know
Oh yes, and how! I have flannel-lined pants with cargo pockets, and the pants are thicker than average and the velcro flaps of the pockets add to the thickness - alarms go off and normally I flap the flaps open to show that they're just flaps, not "things" I carry.
But now, the thickness of those pants lights up their obviously recalibrated scanner image (you know, the screen where you see what the TSA person sees and goes by), in the crotch and elsewhere - not a pat-down but a slow inch-by-inch grope resulted, three times in the last couple of months. I even had to open the belt and flies and turn the top of the pants inside out to show that I had nothing strapped around my waist. Quite a show!
Maybe I'll start wearing boxer shorts and drop my pants altogether so they can go on the conveyor belt. With a bit of luck I'll get famous on YouTube, you never know
#10
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've been taken out of line twice for a hand swipe. I was explosive the first time in Houston. I was delayed a half hour while getting the TSA hand swipe, and then an officer took all my electronics into another room for a long time. I believe that the machine picked up some chemical from a shirt that my SIL gave me and had just washed. It had a high aroma. TSA probably spent millions on these worthless instruments.
#12
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Often in random checks, people will be surprised when their baggage or some other items tests positive for cocaine. I'm talking about people who have not knowingly been near cocaine.
The problem is that a 'transfer of evidence' as CSI has taught us all to understand, has taken place.
You have no control over what might test positive. It's inconvenient but it's all part of travel.
The problem is that a 'transfer of evidence' as CSI has taught us all to understand, has taken place.
You have no control over what might test positive. It's inconvenient but it's all part of travel.
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nukesafe
Europe
17
Jun 16th, 2015 12:40 PM