Yet another air fare strategy question

Old Nov 3rd, 2006, 10:46 AM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yet another air fare strategy question

When the lowest far you can find (through kayak and airfare.com) involves two carriers (SAS and Lufthansa), is there any reason to prefer a trip on a single carrier--in case of problems, say? In this case, we're flying open jaw, and the all-Lufthansa option (which is actually partly on United) is $50 more (for two tickets)--not a deal breaker. Also, I'm pretty sure people have had good experiences with airefare.com--is that right? And finally, we're talking open jaw flights to France next April/May in the $900-$910 range (apiece)--should I lock it in or wait?
carolynk is offline  
Old Nov 3rd, 2006, 11:36 AM
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Carol,

I just booked an open jaw Paris ticket for $550. This was into CDG and out of BRU from CLE. It is for travel at the end of the month.

You don't say where you are leaving from, but Orbitz shows the same trip I booked for mid April at $740 on Delta + Air France.

Can you tell me what city you are leaving from?

Kevin

alyssamma is offline  
Old Nov 3rd, 2006, 11:36 AM
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 17,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you have cross-checked airfares using sites such as www.onetravel.com and www.itasoftware.com and the fares are the same then waiting may or may not be worthwhile.

I notice the current Lufthansa sale to Europe is for travel before April. Does that mean the company does not feel the need to lower fares for the 1 April and beyond period?
Dukey is offline  
Old Nov 3rd, 2006, 11:55 AM
  #4  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We're leaving from Washington DC (preferably Dulles, very close to us; DC could be OK but we don't want Baltimore)and flying into Nice (11 April), then home from Bordeaux 21 May. We don't want the flight from Bordeaux that leaves at 6:25 AM; there's one at 11:50. (Extra money is worth it in this case.)I guess you pay more if the trip is longer than 30 days, too.
Carolyn
carolynk is offline  
Old Nov 3rd, 2006, 12:06 PM
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hehe...well that makes all the difference. Given that you are staying >30 days and flying into and out of non-normal international airports, the price you got sounds pretty good.

If price is at all important to you, you can do a lot to lower it. Since you are there for so long, you could easily start and end in Paris.

But, if price doesn't matter and you just want to know about $900 being a good deal...yes, for what you want to do it is

Kevin
alyssamma is offline  
Old Nov 3rd, 2006, 12:07 PM
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,568
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It should not matter if you switch airlines as long as you are ticketed for one through trip. In my experience, it is just like changing planes on the same carrier except maybe more distance between gates.
kayd is offline  
Old Nov 3rd, 2006, 12:09 PM
  #7  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kayd, although Carol didn't explicitly say this, since the carriers were SAS and Lufthansa, I believe this is not a codeshare arrangement and she would not be ticketed from DC to her final destination.

That would (potentially) cause problems
alyssamma is offline  
Old Nov 3rd, 2006, 12:14 PM
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 17,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SAS and Lufthansa very much used to have codeshare flights at least when I traveled on SAS (from Dulles) to Copenhagen and on to Berlin on an SAS codeshare flight on Lufthansa.

Dukey is offline  
Old Nov 3rd, 2006, 12:19 PM
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 34,840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not sure I follow your carriers, but I don't think it makes any difference if there are two different carriers -- one going and a different one returning. These are two completely different flights. I do prefer to keep on the same carrier/codeshare for a single direction, though, in case you miss a connection.

I fly on two different carriers quite a bit when I do open jaw, because usually a different carrier has better prices and options out of the other city.
Christina is offline  
Old Nov 3rd, 2006, 12:28 PM
  #10  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The flights in are SAS 926 and 793, changing in Copenhagen. The flights out are Lufthansa 4341 and 414, changing in Munich.
carolynk is offline  
Old Nov 3rd, 2006, 12:44 PM
  #11  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As Christina said, different carriers in and out are no problem. It is only when 2 (non-codeshare) carriers take you in one direction that you could possibly have problems.
alyssamma is offline  
Old Nov 3rd, 2006, 01:18 PM
  #12  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks, that makes sense.
carolynk is offline  
Old Nov 3rd, 2006, 01:46 PM
  #13  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,568
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There's no reason she could not get a Dulles-CPH-FRA ticket with a change of carriers in CPH. It is done every day. I flew on a single itinerary (bag checked all the way through) from Seville on Spanair to Barcelona, Lufthansa to Frankfurt, to Dulles on United. No need for a code share or even that they all be in the same alliance (thought SAS, United and Lufthnsa are all Star Alliance)-- the oldline carriers have agreements for ticketing, baggage handling, etc., with all the other legacy carriers.

Where you would have trouble is mixing legacies with upstarts -- Southwest et al do not have interline agreements and you would have to purchase the segments separately, handle your baggage at the connection airport and lose your seat on the second flight if the first one lands late.
kayd is offline  
Old Nov 3rd, 2006, 02:01 PM
  #14  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kayd, agreed. My point was just that if she is mixing non-codeshare carriers and misses a flight due to delays, it will be easier to rectify if she is ticketed all the way thru to her final destination instead of switching (non-codeshare) carriers.
alyssamma is offline  
Old Nov 3rd, 2006, 02:17 PM
  #15  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,568
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Code-share offers no benefit -- all she needs is to have the entire ticket on "interline agreement" airlines. That's what gives protection in the event of a missed connection.
kayd is offline  
Old Nov 3rd, 2006, 02:21 PM
  #16  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kayd, I'm not going to continue this

I think we are saying the same thing, but maybe not. Anyway, it is moot as it does not apply to the OP's situation.
alyssamma is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
katzen
Europe
4
Feb 20th, 2008 06:48 AM
jace
Europe
11
Dec 12th, 2004 08:21 PM
blondiepopo
Europe
4
Oct 28th, 2004 11:27 AM
barb57
Europe
4
Aug 11th, 2004 02:32 PM
nancyhol
Europe
6
Mar 3rd, 2004 01:39 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -