Vote for the New 7 Wonders of the World
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vote for the New 7 Wonders of the World
Check out:
http://www.n7w.com
The candidates are:
Acropolis
Athens, Greece
Alhambra
Granada, Spain
Angkor
Cambodia
Chichen Itza
Yucatan, Mexico
Christ Redeemer
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Colosseum
Rome, Italy
Easter Island Statues
Chile
Eiffel Tower
Paris, France
Great Wall
China
Hagia Sophia
Istanbul, Turkey
Kyomizu Temple
Kyoto, Japan
Kremlin / St. Basil
Moscow, Russia
Machu Picchu
Peru
Neuschwanstein Castle
Füssen, Germany
Petra
Jordan
Pyramids of Giza
Egypt
Statue of Liberty
New York, USA
Stonehenge
Amesbury, United Kingdom
Sydney Opera House
Australia
Taj Mahal, Agra
India
Timbuktu
Mali
How many have you seen?
http://www.n7w.com
The candidates are:
Acropolis
Athens, Greece
Alhambra
Granada, Spain
Angkor
Cambodia
Chichen Itza
Yucatan, Mexico
Christ Redeemer
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Colosseum
Rome, Italy
Easter Island Statues
Chile
Eiffel Tower
Paris, France
Great Wall
China
Hagia Sophia
Istanbul, Turkey
Kyomizu Temple
Kyoto, Japan
Kremlin / St. Basil
Moscow, Russia
Machu Picchu
Peru
Neuschwanstein Castle
Füssen, Germany
Petra
Jordan
Pyramids of Giza
Egypt
Statue of Liberty
New York, USA
Stonehenge
Amesbury, United Kingdom
Sydney Opera House
Australia
Taj Mahal, Agra
India
Timbuktu
Mali
How many have you seen?
#2
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All but three of them and, frankly, whoever decided that Neuschwanstein was more of a "wonder" than some of the other Ludwig castles obviosuly never visited any of those...sounds more like a list from "Travel and Leisure" compiled by the "Traveled and Bored"
#5
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've been to seven. The Pyramids, Taj Mahal, Acropolis, Colloseum,Eiffel Tower, Statue of Liberty and of course the Sydney Opera House. Apparantly the Taj Mahal is leading in the voting so that should be a definite with the Pyramids another certainty. I'll be upset if the Opera House doesn't make it, but then I am biased!
#8
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For me I think a Wonder of the World should be something that is totally unique and very difficult to reproduce even today, that's why I think some of these selections mean more as symbols rather than Wonders
For example, for me the Eiffel Tower is a symbol but easy to reproduce i.e. 'Blackpool Tower', the same with the Statue of Liberty, Christ Redeemer, Neuschwanstein etc.
I would also leave out Stonehenge & Easter Island etc as they were obviously great achievements in transporting and building them and they have a lot of mystique but this sort of thing is found in other areas. The same goes with the Colosseum, Angkor (Borobudur, Java), Kremlin, Petra, Acropolis
The Mexican, Turkish & Japanese wonders I know nothing about, but I have seen 10 of them and my selection would be,
Taj Mahal - Unique, mystical, beautiful
Great Wall - Easy to design, a bugger to build
Machu Pichu Unique, mystical, beautiful
Pyramids -Unique, mystical
Sydney Opera House - Not sure, maybe its still too modern but it certainly fits the criteria as its unique, beautiful and a bugger to build
Geordie
For example, for me the Eiffel Tower is a symbol but easy to reproduce i.e. 'Blackpool Tower', the same with the Statue of Liberty, Christ Redeemer, Neuschwanstein etc.
I would also leave out Stonehenge & Easter Island etc as they were obviously great achievements in transporting and building them and they have a lot of mystique but this sort of thing is found in other areas. The same goes with the Colosseum, Angkor (Borobudur, Java), Kremlin, Petra, Acropolis
The Mexican, Turkish & Japanese wonders I know nothing about, but I have seen 10 of them and my selection would be,
Taj Mahal - Unique, mystical, beautiful
Great Wall - Easy to design, a bugger to build
Machu Pichu Unique, mystical, beautiful
Pyramids -Unique, mystical
Sydney Opera House - Not sure, maybe its still too modern but it certainly fits the criteria as its unique, beautiful and a bugger to build
Geordie
#9
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well! I've visited 14 out of the 21. Apart from the one location in Japan all the ones I haven't are in the Americas. That's the big unexplored continent for me.
I don't understand how Neuschwanstein got onto the list (IMO only a one star attraction - seeing as we are talking in those marketing-driven terms).
Why the Alhambra rather than the Mesquita? Why no gothic cathedrals on the list?
Looks like a list drawn up by someone who has only been to those places that travel agents say you should.
I don't understand how Neuschwanstein got onto the list (IMO only a one star attraction - seeing as we are talking in those marketing-driven terms).
Why the Alhambra rather than the Mesquita? Why no gothic cathedrals on the list?
Looks like a list drawn up by someone who has only been to those places that travel agents say you should.
#10
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,098
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
By some of the criteria I've read in this thread, nothing man-made would qualify as a wonder.
Anyway, as to Neuschwanstein, I don't see it as any less worthy than some of the other candidates. For some reason there are people who have an intense dislike for this building. I've never really seen any logical reason why.
It is a truly fantastic confection born of a fevered or insane mind (depending on which history books you've read), and it has an unreal beauty in its mountain setting.
Beyond that, it has great symbolic historical value not only in the changes taking place and soon to take place in the German states of that time, but of the entire period following the Congress of Vienna through the First World War as the Europe's monarchical governments began to unravel for a variety of reasons--including the squandering of wealth epitomized by Ludwig's castle-building spree.
Beyond its ethereal "beauty," its position as a 20th Century cultural icon (the "Disneyland castle" should not be underestimated.
Just because it isn't old, it had no practical purpose as a fortification, and lots of people like it, does not necessarily make it a bad thing or a one-star attraction.
Beyond that, the rooms that were finished have some examples of superb 19th Century craftsmanship--especially in woodworking.
As to manmade wonders of the world--of those listed, I'd go for the Angkor complex, the Colosseum, the Pyramids, and the Great Wall. I'd nominate the personal computer, the internal combustion engine, and vaccines.
Anyway, as to Neuschwanstein, I don't see it as any less worthy than some of the other candidates. For some reason there are people who have an intense dislike for this building. I've never really seen any logical reason why.
It is a truly fantastic confection born of a fevered or insane mind (depending on which history books you've read), and it has an unreal beauty in its mountain setting.
Beyond that, it has great symbolic historical value not only in the changes taking place and soon to take place in the German states of that time, but of the entire period following the Congress of Vienna through the First World War as the Europe's monarchical governments began to unravel for a variety of reasons--including the squandering of wealth epitomized by Ludwig's castle-building spree.
Beyond its ethereal "beauty," its position as a 20th Century cultural icon (the "Disneyland castle" should not be underestimated.
Just because it isn't old, it had no practical purpose as a fortification, and lots of people like it, does not necessarily make it a bad thing or a one-star attraction.
Beyond that, the rooms that were finished have some examples of superb 19th Century craftsmanship--especially in woodworking.
As to manmade wonders of the world--of those listed, I'd go for the Angkor complex, the Colosseum, the Pyramids, and the Great Wall. I'd nominate the personal computer, the internal combustion engine, and vaccines.
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
barbee
Australia & the Pacific
4
Feb 23rd, 2003 04:05 PM