Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Europe
Reload this Page >

venice or rome for first time Italy travelers

venice or rome for first time Italy travelers

Old Jul 1st, 2012, 05:50 PM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
venice or rome for first time Italy travelers

My husband and I are planning a trip to Italy in October. We are arriving in Rome on October 24th and leaving on November 3rd. We are having a hard time deciding on Venice or Rome. We want to spend the majority of time in Tuscany visiting the small towns and winery's. The plan was originally fly into Rome on Wed. am then on to Florence on Friday and Sat. then on to other parts of Tuscany for the rest of the trip. leaving for Rome on the 2nd then flying out the morning of the 3rd, It seems terrible to be in Italy and not see Venice but just didn't think we had time. Some day would love to return and see the Amalfi coast but who knows when that would be. Any suggestions about sticking with our original plan or nix Rome and fly into Venice and save Rome for the next if ever trip to the Amalfi coast? Thank you, kathy
Kathy_Evans is offline  
Old Jul 1st, 2012, 06:14 PM
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have you given any thought to an open jaw ticket -fly into one city (Venice) and fly out of Rome. Even if you spend only one night in Venice, at least you have gotten to see it. Others will advise against it I'm sure, saying you can come back, but will you? I would say Venice first because if you arrive in the early morning you can have that day and part of the next before you take a late afternoon train to Florence.
rfbk50 is offline  
Old Jul 1st, 2012, 06:17 PM
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Our family adores Venice, really likes Florence and finds Rome interesting. So, if it was me, I would opt for Venice above all. It is so unique. Florence has wonderful art and is easy to get around the sights. Rome has wonderful monuments & art but not so easy to get around.
SusannahT is offline  
Old Jul 1st, 2012, 06:39 PM
  #4  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
>>It seems terrible to be in Italy and not see Venice
Axel2DP is offline  
Old Jul 1st, 2012, 06:41 PM
  #5  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,584
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i would stay in rome. there is just so much to see and do in rome that you could spend two weeks there and still want to go back for more.

i love venice, but venice is not as glorious as rome.

venice can be very touristy.

thin
Pepper_von_snoot is offline  
Old Jul 1st, 2012, 06:58 PM
  #6  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think your original itinerary is fine. If you must arrive and depart through Rome, I would adjust you itinerary slightly to avoid one hotel change and put all your Rome night together.

Wed, Oct 24 - arrive Rome, travel to Florence; sleep Florence
Thu, Oct 25 - Florence
Fri, Oct 26 - Florence
Sat, Oct 27 - to Tuscany countryside location
Sun, Oct 28 - Tuscany
Mon, Oct 29 - Tuscany
Tue, Oct 30 - Tuscany to Rome
Wed, Oct 31 - Rome
Thu, Nov 1 - Rome
Fri, Nov 2 - Rome
Sat, Nov 3 - fly home
ellenem is online now  
Old Jul 1st, 2012, 06:59 PM
  #7  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Venice vs. Rome, it depends on what you want to see, and what's drawing you to Italy, and to those two places. I think both are wonderful, in their own different ways.

One thing to consider is aqua alta in Venice, when the waters rise and can make getting around a bit difficult. I think that generally happens November-March, and it's not a reason to not go to Venice, but something to keep in mind.

For me, Rome means lots of ancient sites to visit, churches and art from a variety of periods, and a big, vibrant city (sometimes noisy too). Venice is beautiful everything, lots of art and architecture, but mostly to be enjoyed by walking, walking around.

You can never see it all (whatever "all" is), on any trip. Be merciless with yourselves, and limit your time to either the north or the south.
Lexma90 is offline  
Old Jul 1st, 2012, 07:29 PM
  #8  
kja
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IMO, ellenem suggested a decent option for tweaking your original plan. Trying to fit in another destination will mean losing a chunk of time - at least 1/2 day in each direction, and whatever time you allot to your added destinatation. So if you try to add Venice, you would only be able to do so by sacrificing quite a LOT of time in these other places. And IMO, you're already giving Florence and Rome short shrift. But only you can decide what you want to do. At least you'll get some glimpses of glorious places no matter what you decide.

Hope that helps!
kja is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
heehaa
Europe
27
Mar 4th, 2006 10:29 PM
MLnLA
Europe
27
Sep 23rd, 2003 08:37 PM
mdtravel
Europe
7
May 1st, 2003 11:04 AM
SashaZ
Europe
17
Apr 17th, 2003 04:31 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -