Travel wear
#64
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,815
Likes: 0
That <i>was</i> a joke.
Maybe I needed the extra Choo.
But speaking of "naff", I recall a seeing a clothing store called (I think) "Naff-Naff" on my first visit to Paris, in 1987. I remember it because it was such a funny-sounding name.
Maybe I needed the extra Choo. But speaking of "naff", I recall a seeing a clothing store called (I think) "Naff-Naff" on my first visit to Paris, in 1987. I remember it because it was such a funny-sounding name.
#66
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,943
Likes: 0
I also apologize to Oaktown Traveller. I never mean to be malicious; my intent is humour. This is why I use the 
You have to take responsibility for your posts, however. Some of your writings above border on the inane and seem rather doctrinaire. You accuse us of the same behavior that you are guilty of.
Please do not leave this forum. You just have to start drinking gin, like I do, before logging on. It makes everyone here oh so much nicer. Cheers.

You have to take responsibility for your posts, however. Some of your writings above border on the inane and seem rather doctrinaire. You accuse us of the same behavior that you are guilty of.
Please do not leave this forum. You just have to start drinking gin, like I do, before logging on. It makes everyone here oh so much nicer. Cheers.
#71
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
pgmargate:
Let me quote you, since you are apparently incapable of either saying what you mean, or of understanding your own statements: "Why should Amy expect that the churches in europe are any different then in the U.S.?" And by the way Rhodes Scholar, it's "than" not "then." And Europe is capitalized. It's a continent - the one that you traveled through with a Eurailpass in 34 days! Wow, were you able to do it without wetting your pants?
And while you're sitting around the pool at the Burj-Al-Arab hotel (there's a dream destination if I've ever heard one) take a good, long look at your reflection in the water. You'll see what we mean.
Let me quote you, since you are apparently incapable of either saying what you mean, or of understanding your own statements: "Why should Amy expect that the churches in europe are any different then in the U.S.?" And by the way Rhodes Scholar, it's "than" not "then." And Europe is capitalized. It's a continent - the one that you traveled through with a Eurailpass in 34 days! Wow, were you able to do it without wetting your pants?
And while you're sitting around the pool at the Burj-Al-Arab hotel (there's a dream destination if I've ever heard one) take a good, long look at your reflection in the water. You'll see what we mean.
#72
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,815
Likes: 0
Naf-Naf, not Naff-Naff, eh? Thanks, Mimi.
I wonder if the Naf is related to the British slang Naff. It would seem odd to have a clothing store with a name that's a slang term for tacky or unfashionable...
http://www.londonslang.com/db/n/
...but, on the other hand, maybe it's being used in a hip, ironic sense.
I wonder if the Naf is related to the British slang Naff. It would seem odd to have a clothing store with a name that's a slang term for tacky or unfashionable...
http://www.londonslang.com/db/n/
...but, on the other hand, maybe it's being used in a hip, ironic sense.
#74
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,815
Likes: 0
Just found this... 
"Sneakers during the Viking invasions of Europe"
http://sneakers.pair.com/viking.htm

"Sneakers during the Viking invasions of Europe"
http://sneakers.pair.com/viking.htm
#77
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 0
I am telling you- m_k is a butler to old lady with bad temper. She obuses him mercylesly.
When he is off - he pretends to be her and gets even with the world.
But what is really funny that I think he really is adapted to woman style and he can't get out of the shell to be a man. Old worned out man !
When he is off - he pretends to be her and gets even with the world.
But what is really funny that I think he really is adapted to woman style and he can't get out of the shell to be a man. Old worned out man !
#79
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,630
Likes: 0
..and now for something entirely different.
Before I went to Paris last November, I read somewhere that lots and lots of women in Paris, all ages, wore black leather trousers. I never saw one single pair. I was going to take mine, but my friends reminded me that they get "knees" and look like c$@p... and oh, how gauche!
Funny, how "everyone" sees things, reports them and if printed, turn into some sort of treatise of truth... black leather pants! Bah!
Before I went to Paris last November, I read somewhere that lots and lots of women in Paris, all ages, wore black leather trousers. I never saw one single pair. I was going to take mine, but my friends reminded me that they get "knees" and look like c$@p... and oh, how gauche!
Funny, how "everyone" sees things, reports them and if printed, turn into some sort of treatise of truth... black leather pants! Bah!
#80
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
pgmargate:
Typing skills? No one would ever use the word "skills" in connection with you. And, of course, your latest post is precisely what I would have expected - a meaningless regurgitation with no substantive response. Obviously, you now see how foolish you were. You said something, then claimed you didn't. You grow sadder by the minute. Even m kingdom has abandoned you for your laughable conceit about a wretched hotel in oil country.
You now stand alone as the poster boy for the Fodors Hall of Shame. I'll waste no more time on you regardless of what pathetic prattle comes next. You provoked all rational Fodorites by your tasteless and asinine response to a perfectly reasonable inquiry. Fortunately, you are not the arbiter of what belongs on this board. Unfortunately, your verbal refuse promises to sicken us indefinitely
Typing skills? No one would ever use the word "skills" in connection with you. And, of course, your latest post is precisely what I would have expected - a meaningless regurgitation with no substantive response. Obviously, you now see how foolish you were. You said something, then claimed you didn't. You grow sadder by the minute. Even m kingdom has abandoned you for your laughable conceit about a wretched hotel in oil country.
You now stand alone as the poster boy for the Fodors Hall of Shame. I'll waste no more time on you regardless of what pathetic prattle comes next. You provoked all rational Fodorites by your tasteless and asinine response to a perfectly reasonable inquiry. Fortunately, you are not the arbiter of what belongs on this board. Unfortunately, your verbal refuse promises to sicken us indefinitely



