Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Europe
Reload this Page >

Suggestion for Two-City Trip in Europe

Search

Suggestion for Two-City Trip in Europe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 14th, 2007 | 05:58 AM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Suggestion for Two-City Trip in Europe

Last year, DH and I spent a week in Munich and Salzburg. We are now looking for another European trip that will allow us to visit two cities using only public transportation and that involves a pleasant ride between the cities (and that can be completed in one week). We are willing to consider pairings that require open-jaw air tickets, but would probably prefer RT air travel.

We are open to suggestions about any part of Europe. Obvious pairings include Paris-Amsterdam, Madrid-Barcelona, maybe Vienna-Prague, but we were hoping to hear about some less-obvious pairings as well.

Thanks in advance.
turista2 is offline  
Old Feb 14th, 2007 | 06:04 AM
  #2  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,704
Likes: 0
Well, I would certainly recommend more than a week but London-Paris would be good.
sandi_travelnut is offline  
Old Feb 14th, 2007 | 06:35 AM
  #3  
nbujic
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Copenhagen - Stockholm
 
Old Feb 14th, 2007 | 06:46 AM
  #4  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,646
Likes: 11
I have taken a couple of two-city vacations and enjoyed the contrast between cultures rather than pairing similar cities, although this did involve flying between cities and flying open jaw. My daughter and I spent one week visiting London and Venice. We spent another week visiting Paris and Rome.
Nikki is offline  
Old Feb 14th, 2007 | 06:48 AM
  #5  
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 36,842
Likes: 0
To be honest, with so many cheap interEurope flights these days, I no longer see the need for a pair of cities to be that close or even in the same general area. I think having two totally different destinations makes for a more varied vacation -- almost like getting two for one. So if you can do an open jaw flight and get a cheap flight between the two, why not? You could fly between Vienna and Barcelona for example in less time than a train between two fairly close cities, and certainly if you have to return to the same city to fly home.
NeoPatrick is offline  
Old Feb 14th, 2007 | 06:52 AM
  #6  
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 17,549
Likes: 0
If these are the sole criteria I offer up www.skyscanner.net so you can check on budget flights.

You might also consider the combination of Prague and Berlin if you want a REAL contrast and they are only 5.5 hours apart by rail.
Dukey is offline  
Old Feb 14th, 2007 | 06:53 AM
  #7  
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,433
Likes: 0
Herself and I did Oslo and Copenhagen in one trip, doing the transfer by overnight ferry, which we found very pleasant (especially sailing out of Oslo).

A good dinner on the boat cost only an arm, whereas good meals in Oslo or Copenhagen cost an arm and a leg.
Padraig is offline  
Old Feb 14th, 2007 | 07:21 AM
  #8  
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,293
Likes: 0
So many choices. What time of the year. Last year I took the night ferry from Stockholm to Helsinki. For cooler months, I would vote for Madrid/Barcelona.

You could enjoy Tallinn, Estonia for the day if you go to Helsinki.
wally34949 is offline  
Old Feb 14th, 2007 | 07:23 AM
  #9  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 98,212
Likes: 12
Venice/Paris (but you'd want open jaw plane ticket)
suze is offline  
Old Feb 14th, 2007 | 07:39 AM
  #10  
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 12,188
Likes: 0
We did Edinburgh/Berlin last August as an open-jaw on Continental, with an EasyJet ticket in-between.
WillTravel is offline  
Old Feb 14th, 2007 | 08:04 AM
  #11  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
I think Paris and Venice would be an awesome pairing. Or fly into Zurich and visit two regions in Switzerland. Train service is great there.
I'd also suggest open jaw. It is not always more expensive - depending on the cities. The fare will be halfway between the RT fares for each city. It saves you having to backtrack, which costs money and time.

Have fun!
cls2paris is offline  
Old Feb 14th, 2007 | 12:20 PM
  #12  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Thanks for the suggestions. The advice gives us a lot to consider!
turista2 is offline  
Old Feb 14th, 2007 | 12:22 PM
  #13  
ira
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,699
Likes: 0
Hi T,

With only a week, why 2 cities?

You can easily spend a week in

Paris, London, Rome, Vienna, Amsterdam, Copenhagen, Stockholm, Florence, Lisbon, Madrid, to name a few.

ira is offline  
Old Feb 14th, 2007 | 12:47 PM
  #14  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,916
Likes: 0
Prague - Krakow
Budapest - Vienna
Ljublana - Venice
Sofia - Istanbul
Helsinki - Tallin (boat, not train in between)

I have been to all of those cities, and each are a great place for at least half a week.
thit_cho is offline  
Old Feb 14th, 2007 | 01:44 PM
  #15  
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
I recommend Paris and Provence... good combinatinon regardless of the season you're going to be traveling in! Enjoy!
sunnyeve17 is offline  
Old Feb 14th, 2007 | 02:05 PM
  #16  
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 36,842
Likes: 0
Except that in my opinion exploring Provence is really not very effective by "public transportation" as the poster requested.
NeoPatrick is offline  
Old Feb 14th, 2007 | 05:09 PM
  #17  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 0
With only a week, I would limit my cities to one - especially cities like Paris, London, Rome. Smaller cities, maybe 2 that aren't far apart. Your Munich/Salzburg pairing sounds nice.
Sue4 is offline  
Old Feb 14th, 2007 | 06:28 PM
  #18  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Venice and the Dolomites. Castelrotto
or Ortesei, City and mountains.
DanB is offline  
Old Feb 14th, 2007 | 08:39 PM
  #19  
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,183
Likes: 0
With only a week, I'd probably just stay in one area but if you really want to go to two cities, I'd suggest Paris & Florence. You can take the overnight train and they are both easy to navigate without a car.

Another possibility, if you're okay with one city and one town, would be Paris and Varenna. It's a little harder to travel between the two (you can fly to Milan and then take a train to Varenna. Once you're in Varenna, you can use the ferry to get to other towns on Lake Como) but I really liked the contrast of all the things to do in Paris followed by relaxing and enjoying the scenery in Varenna. Or you can rest from jet lag in Varenna and then travel to Paris.
Shanti is offline  
Old Feb 15th, 2007 | 05:15 AM
  #20  
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
London & Paris.
sesjazz01 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -