Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Europe
Reload this Page >

Rotterdam. Worth a day or two?

Search

Rotterdam. Worth a day or two?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 14th, 2006 | 09:17 AM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Rotterdam. Worth a day or two?

I keep reading articles about Rotterdam's emergence as a cool urban getaway spot, yet I've never really heard a fellow traveler say anything positive (or anything at all) about R'dam.
Anyone have opinions? For the record, I like the lively modernity of Berlin or Brussels as well as the old world grandeur of the better-preserved capitals such as Paris.
martytravels is offline  
Old Oct 14th, 2006 | 10:36 AM
  #2  
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,432
Likes: 0
Rotterdam is quite modern, so you would like it. It has several museums, and is a hip place. My friends live in between there & Amsterdam, and like Rotterdam better. I would definitely give it a try, if you have a few days to spare.
amp322 is offline  
Old Oct 14th, 2006 | 12:30 PM
  #3  
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
During our trip to the Netherlands, we visited Rotterdam as well.

You might want to read my trip report to see what we did in Rotterdam in one day (Clogs, Windmills and Canals)

http://fodors.com/forums/threadselec...p;tid=34825601
gabrieltraian is offline  
Old Oct 14th, 2006 | 02:07 PM
  #4  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Hip is good. Thanks amp for the tips and gabriel for the trip report link.
martytravels is offline  
Old Oct 14th, 2006 | 03:07 PM
  #5  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 27,068
Likes: 0
I spent about half a day there last year. It was ok, though I spent most of my time at the Museum Boijmans van Beuningen. If you like art, you definitely do not want to miss this gem.
yk2004 is offline  
Old Oct 15th, 2006 | 08:42 AM
  #6  
DAX
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,833
Likes: 0
Been there 3 times and find it interesting though not in anyway to be compared to Berlin's modern side. Yes, there is quite number of interesting modern buildings & sculptures but the total layout & effect are not impressive due to poor, inconsistent city planning. It looks rather spotty with several uninteresting/unsightly structures & scattered undeveloped lots. They also need to update/make the public areas & sidewalks more attractive/comfortable. That said, our cousins find it to be a better city to live in than Amsterdam which is more rundown & overcrowded to live in.
DAX is offline  
Old Oct 15th, 2006 | 09:27 AM
  #7  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
"than Amsterdam which is more rundown & overcrowded to live in."

Parts of it sure, but the canal rings make it one of the most beautiful cities in Europe, IMHO. I love A'dam.
martytravels is offline  
Old Oct 15th, 2006 | 09:48 AM
  #8  
DAX
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,833
Likes: 0
I think Amsterdam is a good tourist destination but not necessarily to live in, unless one lives in the nice suburbs.
DAX is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ita
Europe
11
May 31st, 2014 08:55 PM
ragingregan
Europe
10
Jul 2nd, 2008 07:04 PM
r505
Europe
6
Sep 27th, 2005 01:25 AM
BreukelenMan
Europe
9
Apr 30th, 2005 03:12 AM
BabsB
Europe
10
Aug 21st, 2004 04:18 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -