Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Europe
Reload this Page >

RETHINKING OUR POSITION ON FRANCE...

Search

RETHINKING OUR POSITION ON FRANCE...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 16th, 2003, 05:54 AM
  #41  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Buzzy: I am against the war (without the UN's support). Nevertheless, you summed up my feelings about France. I am going in May to Nice for 5 days, then to Italy for 12 days. My husband is voicing his displeasure with the France portion of the trip....he would like to focus just on Italy. BUT this has always been my dream trip, and it is a FF ticket which was REALLY DIFFICULT to get! What to do, what to do..... Judy
Judyrem is offline  
Old Mar 16th, 2003, 08:11 AM
  #42  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<BR>A little insight into the thinking of the French and Russians. <BR>Did you know France and Russie are owed $6 bliion and $8 billion, respectively, from arms deals made with SH during the Iraq-Iran war? Do you think the fact that they might not get paid by the regime that replaces SH has some effect on their voting at the League of Nations? <BR><BR>France, Russia and China also have oil deals made with SH worth tens of billions of dollars. You can read about it in today's Newsday (a far left rag that hates GWB, no less). <BR><BR>So this war is to some degree about money and oil -- and that explains France's position to a large degree.
Magnus is offline  
Old Mar 16th, 2003, 08:16 AM
  #43  
Sylvia
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
&gt;Of course we do...you drink Coca Cola, &gt;wear Levis, watch American movies, &gt;listen to American music, drive Fords &gt;and love Pizza Hut, Burger King, &gt;McDonalds, visit Euro disneyland and &gt;that pales imitation of a &gt;beer..Budweiser is the fastest growing <BR>&gt;beer in Europe! (tongue in cheek here!)<BR><BR>Well, I can honestly say that I have done none of the above. My husband drinks &quot;real&quot; Budvar Budweiser. I myself sometimes buy the American version for the garden. I put it in my slug pubs. The slugs and snails love it.
 
Old Mar 16th, 2003, 08:39 AM
  #44  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DiAblo: Your observations on the French position are right on target. We have cancelled our trip to France this summer and will go to Great Britain instead. It is incomprehensible that a nation directly subjected to fascism and dictatorship (in various forms) so frequently over the past several centuries would take a position that aids a murderous dictator more than those trying to disarm him. We can only hope that the 6th Republic &quot;gets it&quot; better than the first five!<BR><BR>As for Beatle, the antiwar sentiment is certainly understandable. There is no doubt that we will lose some of our young countrymen, and there will be innocent Iraqi causalities. War is terrible, and hopefully still is avoided. There is also no doubt that over two million Iraqis have been killed by Sadaam, and today over two hundred thousand sit in concentration camps. Without intervention, Iraqi dissidents claim another million will lose their lives over the next decade. How much more &quot;containment&quot; can the free nations of the world endure? That’s before considering that a dictator with weapons of mass destruction and a history of invading his neighbors is in blatant violation of treaty obligations.<BR><BR>But what triggered me to register and respond (apologize for my smart ass screen name up front) is the complete lack of historical accuracy in defending the French that has been asserted as &quot;fact&quot;. The FACT is that the French has long demonstrated an amazing lack of courage and loyalty.<BR><BR>Beatle, let's get the facts straight on WW2. First, France fell to Germany with amazing speed - the Germans invaded on May 12 1940 and arrived in Paris on June 14 1940. France signed an armistice with the Axis on June 22, ending their direct defense to the Axis invaders. It is true that there were some brave resistance fighters, but to characterize the French as anything other that cowards is a stretch. Let's compare this to Russia, which bled Germany dry and lost over 26 MILLION citizens and soldiers fighting back the Nazi horde. The French lost a grand total of 580,000 during the entire war and occupation (including Vichy fighting for the Axis).<BR><BR>Once the US entered the war a then little known General named Dwight Eisenhower led a joint British and US invasion force to Morroco in November 1942 to attack the Axis underbelly. And who was waiting for the Allies? Germans? Italians? Morrocans? No. The Vichy French - more than 120,000 of them! Of course, in typical French fashion, they surrendered without firing a shot. With friends like these, who needs enemies?<BR><BR>To give credit to the French for victory Normandy (and claim over 200,000 French died there) is a gross injustice to the US, Canadian, and British that bravely lost their lives fighting to end Nazi occupation of the continent. Complete revisionist history bunk.<BR><BR>I realize that after the 60s it's not cool to be proud of the US and especially not our military. And it is cool to give everyone else (including a murderous dictator) the benefit of the doubt and assume our own government is the screwed up one.<BR><BR>Well, I'm proud of our stance as a force for good in the world. I'm ashamed (although not surprised) with the French stance that clearly makes the world a more dangerous place. If we allow the UN &quot;debating society&quot; to continue on forever without action we're destined to repeat the lessons of history (Cambodia and Rwanda are a couple of glaring examples).<BR><BR>I can't figure out what the French hope to accomplish with their stance, but I for one won't be spending any of my money there.<BR>
Pax_Americana is offline  
Old Mar 16th, 2003, 09:16 AM
  #45  
Cassandra
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I get such a giggle about all the conservatives suddenly prescribing politically correct terminology and behavior, particularly our resident blowhard, Uncle_Sam.<BR><BR>Or I would if it weren't such a serious matter.
 
Old Mar 16th, 2003, 09:26 AM
  #46  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This just in, &quot;France's Chirac Says Willing to Accept 30-Day Deadline for Iraq to Disarm&quot;. Here's the link:<BR>http://news.yahoo.com/fc?tmpl=fc&amp;cid...amp;cat=france
Beatchick is offline  
Old Mar 16th, 2003, 09:46 AM
  #47  
jor
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So don't go to France. And be sure to bocott a french fry. Most people of the world do not agree with you nor Bush.
jor is offline  
Old Mar 16th, 2003, 09:49 AM
  #48  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pax Americana<BR><BR><BR>One word added to your post....<BR><BR>AMEN!!!!!!!<BR><BR>US
uncle_sam is offline  
Old Mar 16th, 2003, 09:50 AM
  #49  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,716
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And retired CIA agents are appealing to colleagues still working there to go public with evidence that the Bush administration is &quot;slanting intelligence to support its case for war with Iraq.&quot;<BR><BR>http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...intelligence_4
Lesli is offline  
Old Mar 16th, 2003, 09:51 AM
  #50  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
jor,<BR><BR>Who cares what the rest of the world thinks!<BR><BR>The playerss that are going to make this happen are in place..US, UK, Spain, Italy, Australia and 46 other countries...we are hardly going it alone!<BR><BR>My suggestion...go hide and watch...and then if Bush and Blair were wrong...the voters will remove them from office!<BR><BR>US
uncle_sam is offline  
Old Mar 16th, 2003, 10:07 AM
  #51  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some additional information to consider for those who believe that there is no link between SH and terrorist threats to the U. S. Last week, Reuters reported:<BR><BR>* Families of Palestinians killed by Israel received $245,000 in checks from SH, underscoring his continued support for a Palestinian revolt. <BR><BR>* Leaders of a pro-Iraq Palestinian group handed out checks after delivering fiery speeches extolling SH’s virtues to hundreds of relatives of &quot;martyrs&quot; in Gaza City. <BR><BR>* Officials of the Palestinian Arab Liberation Front staging the ceremony said Saddam has now paid $35 million to support the kin of Palestinians killed in the Gaza Strip and West Bank in the last 29 months. <BR><BR>* Iraq and Palestine are in one trench. “Saddam is a hero,&quot; said a banner over a mural of Saddam and Yasser Arafat, who sided with Iraq in the 1991 Gulf War against the U.S. <BR><BR>* Palestinian suicide bomber families receive checks for $25,000 and 22 families of militants killed in fighting or of civilians killed during Israeli army offensives, incursions or air strikes got $10,000 each<BR><BR>Does anyone still really think that doing nothing to remove SH from power is the answer?<BR>
Lorac1127 is offline  
Old Mar 16th, 2003, 10:25 AM
  #52  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As we all know, Chirac's main interest is the &quot;economic welfare of France.&quot; In my humble opinion, I suggest we return the favor. <BR><BR>For those who are so inclined to a French boycott, besides wine, keep these companies in mind.<BR><BR>Air France<BR>Air Liquide<BR>Airbus<BR>Alcatel, based in Paris France<BR>Allegra (Allergy Medication) Aventis Pharmaceuticals<BR>Atos Origin, Inc. French consulting firm. 2nd largest in Europe<BR>AXA Advisors<BR>BIC (Razors, Pens &amp; Lighters)<BR>Biotherm (Cosmetics)<BR>Bollinger (Champagne)<BR>Chanel<BR>Christian Dior<BR>Club Med<BR>Dannon (Yogurt &amp; Dairy Foods)<BR>DKNY (LVMH acquired 100% of Gabrielle Studio, licenser of Donna Karan trademarks)<BR>Dom Perignon<BR>Evian<BR>Fina Oil ($Billions invested in Iraqi Oil fields)<BR>Givenchy<BR>Hennessy<BR>International Herald Tribune<BR>Jacobs Creek<BR>Lancome<BR>Le Creuset (Cookware)<BR>L'Oreal (Health &amp;Beauty Products)<BR>Louis Vuitton<BR>Marie Claire<BR>Maybelline<BR>M&eacute;phisto (Footwear &amp; Apparel)<BR>Michelin (Tires &amp; Auto Parts)<BR>Moet (Champagne)<BR>Mumms (Champagne)<BR>Perrier (Water)<BR>Peugeot (Automobiles)<BR>Pierre Cardin<BR>RCA (televisions &amp;electronics), owned by Thompson Electronics, France<BR>Renault (Automobiles--I use that word loosely)<BR>Sparkletts (Water) Owned by Danone, based in France<BR>Technicolor<BR>Universal Studios (Music, Movies &amp;Theme Parks) Owned by Vivendi-Universal, France<BR>Veritas Group<BR>Vittel<BR>Vivendi<BR>Yoplait<BR>Yves Saint Laurent <BR>
Lorac1127 is offline  
Old Mar 16th, 2003, 10:27 AM
  #53  
jor
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am sure that uncle_sam would like us to go hide and watch, so he can get his precious war. sam has a problem. He wants everyone else to fight his war so he can go to Ireland this summer.
jor is offline  
Old Mar 16th, 2003, 10:33 AM
  #54  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pax Americana- I was responding to the idea of characterizing all French(or all people of any nation) as &quot;cowards&quot;- and how that was simply not accurate due to the several hundred thousand deaths at Normandy. I was in no way taking away any credit from the Allies. It is equally inaccurate when some of my friends on the far right only give credit to the US, and therefore that entitles us to a blank check in all matters of Foreign policy. Let's not forget the British, Canadians etc as you mentioned. Of course the US played the major role, but it would have been tough without support from our other Allies. <BR>As far as the 60's, I think it was &quot;cool&quot; that the growing anti war sentiment in this nation helped to get us out of Vietnam and perhaps save Am GI lives. Too bad it didn't take hold earlier. <BR> Pax, even though we both agree that SH must go, we have an honest diff. of opinion on how to do it. I can understand how you may not be willing to wait any longer. <BR>One last quesion, I haven't seen much mention of Rumsfeld's name on any Posts. Do you consider him to be a positive force for Am. foreign policy? Just curious.
Beatle is offline  
Old Mar 16th, 2003, 10:46 AM
  #55  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
jur,<BR><BR>I am offended by your comment that I want war! I am certain that there are some that do, but most of the people I know do not want war.<BR><BR>However, Leniin was right when he said that American liberals were useful fools!<BR><BR>There comes a time when &quot;giving peace a chance &quot; won't get it done. SH uses &quot;useful fools&quot; to further his cause and extend his regime that has MURDERED 2,000,000 PEOPLE..where is your outage?<BR><BR>He has gassed his own people, he tortures them and yet people like you can only blame Bush!<BR><BR>Hopefully you are not one of those useful fools...but given the comments that you just made regarding my vacation to Ireland and other comnets <BR><BR>I've read, perhaps you are...perhaps not, you may just be confused!<BR><BR>US<BR><BR>US
uncle_sam is offline  
Old Mar 16th, 2003, 10:49 AM
  #56  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
&quot;As far as the 60's, I think it was &quot;cool&quot; that the growing anti war sentiment in this nation helped to get us out of Vietnam and perhaps save Am GI lives. Too bad it didn't take hold earlier. &quot;<BR><BR>Do you also think that is was cool that as a result of our leaving....Pol Phot was then able to kill 2,000,000 people!<BR><BR>Selective memory works wonders, doesn't it!<BR><BR>OTOH, being a liberal often means never having to say you're sorry!<BR><BR>US
uncle_sam is offline  
Old Mar 16th, 2003, 10:49 AM
  #57  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It took a conservative to pull us out of Viet Nam, it took a conservative to end the cold war, and it will be a conservative that brings down Saddam Hussein.
wren is offline  
Old Mar 16th, 2003, 11:04 AM
  #58  
lynlor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
So many excellent posts from well informed, pro- American people. I hope this post stays around for awhile. Thanks to all.<BR><BR>(k-mozat has Wagner's Tannhauser on right now... got to give it my full attention)
 
Old Mar 16th, 2003, 11:04 AM
  #59  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Based upon th eultimatum given in the Azores...it looks like that after 12 years of lying, deceit, murder, torture and support for terrorism...looks like Mr Hussein has a choice to make...live or die!<BR><BR>Interesting that he never gave that choice to the 2,00,000 he killed or had killed!<BR><BR><BR>US<BR>
uncle_sam is offline  
Old Mar 16th, 2003, 11:09 AM
  #60  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: &quot;it took a conservative to end the cold war,&quot;<BR><BR>Huh? You're saying that Dubya's dad -- or Reagan -- &quot;ended&quot; the Cold War? <BR><BR>I'd argue that Mikhail Gorbachev had far more to do with that than any conservative Republican U.S. president. <BR><BR>. . . <BR><BR>Lesli, thanks for the link to that article about retired CIA agents and their contention that the Bush administration is &quot;slanting intelligence to support its case for war with Iraq.&quot; <BR><BR>. . .<BR><BR>Tom Friedman has an excellent column, as usual, in today's New York Times, on the difference between Bush and Tony Blair, saying that &quot;Mr. Blair has an international vision that Mr. Bush sorely needs.&quot; Amen to that. <BR><BR>http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/16/opinion/16FRIE.html
capo is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -