Relais Saint Suplice in Paris
Aug 11th, 2005, 09:56 AM
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Relais Saint Suplice in Paris
I have stayed at this Hotel (3, rue de la Garancière, Paris) 3 years ago, and it is in an excellent area, but it was starting to show its age. I just looked it up on france.com, and it shows another facade, as well as it says it has been refurbished.
Does anyone have any newer news on this Hotel ?
Does anyone have any newer news on this Hotel ?
Aug 11th, 2005, 12:35 PM
#2
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mostly just "topping" your question, but also... in case th search function ever DOES get fixed, it would be useful to be able to retrieve this thread, based on (the correct spelling of)<b> Sulpice </b>- - okay?
Best wishes,
Rex
Best wishes,
Rex
Aug 12th, 2005, 11:10 AM
#7
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, so far, five responses to this request (this makes six), and littl has ben accomplished except to keep it at the top fairly often. If it ever does get any useful information (and if the search engine does ever get fixed), at least the thread will be retrievable by others searching for info on Relais St <b>Sulpice</b> since the name does not appear in any other posting other than mine.
Aug 12th, 2005, 11:58 AM
#8
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I understand what you're saying about bringing the subject TTT, but it is a small typo. Many of us who are familiar with Paris can figure it out and give advice. I know I post replies to let the poster know the heading is vague and to repost it. But sometimes just let these small things go as no one is perfect. I don't mean to point a finger, but even you make spelling errors such as the two words in your last reply.
Aug 12th, 2005, 12:07 PM
#9
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The point is making it retreivable by a search on Sulpice, not just fixing a typo.
In retrospect, I should have simply said "There was a mention of Relais St Sulpice in the NYTimes not so long ago".
Or - - eager to see the replies to this; I have always wanted to stay at Relais St Sulpice also.
In retrospect, I should have simply said "There was a mention of Relais St Sulpice in the NYTimes not so long ago".
Or - - eager to see the replies to this; I have always wanted to stay at Relais St Sulpice also.
