Question for Ira or Bobthe navigator
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Question for Ira or Bobthe navigator
I registered for the Italy train site (http://www.trenitalia.com/), never received my password. So I did the forgot password and had it emailed to me. When I got the password it was all letters. When I try and enter it on the site it says it has to be letters and numbers, I tried emailing the help email address but no luck, any ideas?
#5
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi are,
I have two passwords, for resons not important at this time, and both of them are all letters.
I saved the email and converted it to a Word doc. The type was about a size 7. When I used it as was in the copy/paste mode it was rejected.
I changed to font to size 11. It now works, mostly.
I suggest that you try, try again.
Good Luck
I have two passwords, for resons not important at this time, and both of them are all letters.
I saved the email and converted it to a Word doc. The type was about a size 7. When I used it as was in the copy/paste mode it was rejected.
I changed to font to size 11. It now works, mostly.
I suggest that you try, try again.
Good Luck

#8
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's such a simple notion, but it bears saying, as the forum really does depend on message header info being useful to readers and respondents alike. The preferred (by me at the very least, and surely almost everyone else as well) way to title this question would be something like - -
"Has anyone else had trouble with the password assigned by trenitalia.com for buying tickets online?"
Best wishes,
Rex
"Has anyone else had trouble with the password assigned by trenitalia.com for buying tickets online?"
Best wishes,
Rex
#11
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I understand that this is how you see the forum - - but imagine if everyone had the same approach:
1. Question for Tom
2. Info, please... from Dick
3. Can you help me, Harry?
and so on...
When the top 50 questions all contain NO clue as to what the questioner wants to know - - acts of seemingly inconsequential, and minor selfishness - - that's when this forum will have been ruined by useless headers.
1. Question for Tom
2. Info, please... from Dick
3. Can you help me, Harry?
and so on...
When the top 50 questions all contain NO clue as to what the questioner wants to know - - acts of seemingly inconsequential, and minor selfishness - - that's when this forum will have been ruined by useless headers.
#13
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not, ira... it's not a point of names being unique or not.
If ALL the questions were to read:
1. Question for ira
2. Question for rex
3. Question for elaine
4. Question for Patrick
5. Question for cmt
6. Question for cigalechanta
7. Question for Robespierre
8. Another question for ira
and so on...
This is the chaos that potentially ensues.
So, if it would be wrong for everybody to put such message headers on their postings, then - - by slippery slope analogy - - it is wrong for one person to do so also. No different than "cutting in line" - - you can say "well, as long as just one person does it now and then, society doesn't fall apart" - - but if it's okay for one, then it's okay for two, then it's okay for ten...
If ALL the questions were to read:
1. Question for ira
2. Question for rex
3. Question for elaine
4. Question for Patrick
5. Question for cmt
6. Question for cigalechanta
7. Question for Robespierre
8. Another question for ira
and so on...
This is the chaos that potentially ensues.
So, if it would be wrong for everybody to put such message headers on their postings, then - - by slippery slope analogy - - it is wrong for one person to do so also. No different than "cutting in line" - - you can say "well, as long as just one person does it now and then, society doesn't fall apart" - - but if it's okay for one, then it's okay for two, then it's okay for ten...