Photographers, Help

Mar 29th, 2002, 08:24 PM
  #1  
Kim
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Photographers, Help

What do you do about film now that xray machines are on "high"? Do you still take film or purchase upon arrival? I use 1000 speed film at nite outside, as well as in places where a flash is a no-no. What do "professionals" do?
 
Mar 29th, 2002, 09:58 PM
  #2  
topping
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
another late night orphaned unanswered question
 
Mar 30th, 2002, 02:42 AM
  #3  
Myer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
This subject has been covered in some other threads.

Essentially the responses were as follows: Your film is of little concern to those checking. There is a web site (www.faa.gov/avr/afs/fars that has a 23 page guideline. Section 108.17 appears to instruct that you are entitled to have photographic equipment checked without going through x-ray equipment.

Some observations. I can just see myself standing there pointing to a 23 page document with a million people behind me. Also, this is just an American document. What about foreign countries?
 
Mar 30th, 2002, 02:47 AM
  #4  
Myer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Do a search on 'film' and see the one about Newark refuring to hand check.
 
Mar 30th, 2002, 02:54 AM
  #5  
Gretchen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
This has been covered EXTENSIVELY. Put your 1000 speed film out of its canisters in a plastic bag and ask for it to be hand checked. You may succeed. Otherwise buy it in Europe and have it developed there. Definitely put it in your carryon bag.
 
Mar 30th, 2002, 05:11 AM
  #6  
Randy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
In the past the machines never had and effect on my film. Last year I took a digital camera and that has almost eliminated a need for a flash. I took many pictures in the Louvre without a flash and they all came out well.

Last year while in Angers I took pictures of the Tapestry of the Apocalypse without a flash and they came out well considering the very low light enviroment.

Two years ago I would have never thought I would say that a Digital Camera is the only way to go, but after 580 pictures in France last year I have changed my mind.
 
Mar 30th, 2002, 05:20 AM
  #7  
jw
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
OK, I have no pride, here is a really stupid question. Does the use of a digital camera eliminate security x-ray concerns? How about weight? What do you have to carry? Is there a really small digital camera that gives you pictures that actually look the way you remember a scene? Thanks all.
 
Mar 30th, 2002, 11:03 AM
  #8  
Susan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Randy -
Please tell me more about your digital camera - brand? cost? easy to use? weight?
Thanks.
Susan
 
Mar 30th, 2002, 04:33 PM
  #9  
Kim
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Gretchen,
Where have you been? I've flown several times since the 11th and there is no more "hand check". Every topic, city and country have been discussed however, that's what this forum is for. If everyone uses "search" there would be no new questions. Besides, things change daily.
 
Apr 2nd, 2002, 04:34 AM
  #10  
Joy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Interesting read. Just returned from France - I bought a lead bag here in the states, which can be purchased at any good local camera store (not at a Wal-Mart or Target). Make sure you buy a good brand of the lead bag and look at the rating of what it can protect as to X-ray.

I've been told by some security personnel that soon most X-ray machines will "fry" the film even the lower speed. I use 400 and 800 speed. I will always ask to be handchecked and will ask at least 3 times and I arrive early so that I can have enough time to make these requests.

Regarding the lead bag - some airport security will just put your bag through the machine and not ask about that "dark hole" in your luggage and some will take your hand carry out and ask to see what caused that "dark hole" and hand check it after all. There is ABSOLUTELY no standardization on security behavior.
 
Apr 2nd, 2002, 04:53 AM
  #11  
Mark
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
A few things to keep in mind (again, all have been discussed on this forum before):
- The effect of X-rays on film is accumulative, so each pass through security increases the chances that your film will be damaged
- The faster the film, the more likely X-rays will harm it; ISO 1000 is VERY fast film
- Never count on getting a "hand check" of your film. I've been having troubles with this for years, long before Sept. 11th. As other posters have said, buy a good-quality lead-lined film bag RATED FOR 1000 FILM (if that's what you're taking). This is not the place to be "penny wise and pound foolish."
- Maybe some accomodation will be worked out if enough amateur and professional photogs start raising hell with the FAA and the new U.S. transportation security agency. Write letters, call, and email them!
Good luck, Kim!
 
Apr 2nd, 2002, 06:17 AM
  #12  
Gretchen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
To JW and digital cameras. Digitals don't use film--they use memory chips that are not affected by x-ray. I loved taking mine last fall--could put it in my pocket, VERY light, it does everything my SLR's do except give me stacks of prints to leaf through.
You carry a battey charger (or buy batteries) and the camera. There has been lots of discussion about downloading from digitals in order to re-use the memory card. Devices are available for this but with memory cards becoming very reasonable in price it may be easier to just take more cards. Another possibility of taking more pictures is to lower the resolution of pictures, particularly if you are not going to enlarge. No need to take 1000 speed--just set the digital to that ASA and shoot. Then re-set to 100 for the bright light.
 
Apr 2nd, 2002, 06:41 AM
  #13  
Steve Mueller
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

I use a digital and a conventional SLR - both Nikons. The quality of the digital images does not come close to that of the film images.

For your night shots, considering taking a stable tripod and you shouldn't need such high speed film. I have gotten great night shots with Kodachrome 64 using a tripod. So speed isn't critical if you can stablize your camera. The tripod may not help you with your interior shots, however, because most places that don't allow flash also don't allow tripods.

Good luck.
 
Apr 2nd, 2002, 01:19 PM
  #14  
Capo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Steve, you said the quality of the digital images you take doesn't come close to the film images. I admit that I don't know much about digital cameras (yet), but doesn't that depend, to a great extent, on the number of megapixels on the digital image? Thanks.
 
Apr 2nd, 2002, 01:30 PM
  #15  
Marc David Miller
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quality of a digital image is more than just a function of megapixals per image--lens sharpness, bokah, distortion, effective film speed, sturdiness of the camera, lens speed, shutter response time--which is sort of the opposite of what the camera manufacturers are promoting. Did you know that Nikon has a digital camera that is "only" 2.1 mp but costs over $3000--that is because it is designed for high speed (rapid) picture taking, something that most digitals currently cannot achieve.
 
Apr 2nd, 2002, 05:57 PM
  #16  
jd
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Another alternative is to buy Kodak mailers (you can get them cheaply from a number of websites, such as B and H photo). Just drop each roll in the mail when it's done, and when you get home your pictures will be waiting for you.
 
Apr 2nd, 2002, 06:04 PM
  #17  
Paula
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Just returned from Paris last week. They WOULD NOT hand inspect anything at the airport for securityb reasons. Luckily I had brought some of those "Film Shield" bags (leaded pouches) and got out of line to putn the film and camera in them. You can get a pretty good deal on these at Ebay, usually less than 1/2 price. Hope this helps.
 
Apr 3rd, 2002, 12:27 PM
  #18  
ann
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Another vote for digital. After many years and trips lugging my heavy but much loved Nikon I just came back from Paris with only my Olympus digital. I shot over 800 shots - something that would have been extraordinarily expensive with film - for no cost beyond the equipment (well once you get home you still have to print, but only those shots you want). I did have a digital wallet (about $200, holds 3000 shots at 1mb - which I have successfully enlarged to 8x10 prints). The quality is slightly less than that of film at that size but for your standard 4x6 print no one I've shown them to can tell the difference. Digital is great for low light and inside shots too.
 
Apr 3rd, 2002, 12:40 PM
  #19  
Amy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The camera shop that I bought my lead bag from had an interesting bit of news about the next wave of xray security. They said that the screening machines at the terminals (not checked baggage) that are due to be installed by the end of this year wipe out digital cameras, laptops, PDAs, mp3 players, etc. I don't know anything more than that, but when I said I'd be switching to digital for my next trip, they warned me of the above. Anyone else heard anything about this?

And to second what was said above, I was refused hand-checks at 5 out of 6 security points between Boston and Naples two weeks ago.

Amy
 
Apr 3rd, 2002, 01:41 PM
  #20  
Steve Mueller
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Sorry Capo, I didn't notice your question until today. If I were to use enough pixels to simulate the grain resolution of slide film, I would only be able to fit about three to five images per 8Mg card. Because I shoot about 50-100 images per day, it would cost a fortune to buy that many cards. Moreover, the quality of the digital images would still not be as good because the lens quality is inferior. Also, the shutter speeds on my digital are lower, so the images tend to blur slightly even under relatively bright conditions. I could resolve the blur by using a tripod, but considering that the major advantage of a digital camera is convenience, it is easier to use my conventional camera.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dick
United States
10
May 29th, 2002 09:45 AM
KRIS
Europe
5
Apr 29th, 2002 11:40 AM
Myer
Europe
31
Sep 18th, 2001 02:21 PM
Myer
Europe
15
Sep 10th, 2001 08:59 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy -

FODOR'S VIDEO

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:17 PM.