Paris metro stations with escalators or elevators
#41
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,226
Likes: 0
I've visited Paris.
I've traveled with elderly parents.
I've traveled with friends in their early 50's with knee problems and friend in late 50's prior to TWO hip replacement.
I'd take taxis.
Not that expensive within Paris.
In my opinion, well worth the saved time, pain and to enjoy the view above ground as you go from one place to another.
I've traveled with elderly parents.
I've traveled with friends in their early 50's with knee problems and friend in late 50's prior to TWO hip replacement.
I'd take taxis.
Not that expensive within Paris.
In my opinion, well worth the saved time, pain and to enjoy the view above ground as you go from one place to another.
#43

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,359
Likes: 0
I think we'll probably take a taxi hope it's not raining when we leave the restaurant! Last time that happened there were no taxis to be had, even when the restaurant called for one. Not a good end to an otherwise excellent evening.
#48
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Definitely do not count on the metro's to have working escalators or elevators..just too many chances of maintenance shutdown's etc...or particular levels might be locked out so you can't get to the one you need...I used the busses a lot on my last trip and think they are a better option for folks with walking difficulty...There might be a couple of steps but the rear doors have a platform that lowers to allow wheelchairs to get on board and that might be an option to ask for in case a couple of steps are too much...Plus, the seats in the front of the bus are designated for folks like old people, crippled people, or pregnant people..in other words, folks who need to sit down rather than folks who want to sit down...So it ought to work and esp in off-hours..no rush hour...Taxis within central Paris can usually get you back to your hotel for $10-15 US...
So that is an option as well...And if the parents can walk they should walk before the trip to get in shape for it...It will make it much more enjoyable for them once they get to Paris..and of course, really good walking shoes regardless of the transportation choice...
So that is an option as well...And if the parents can walk they should walk before the trip to get in shape for it...It will make it much more enjoyable for them once they get to Paris..and of course, really good walking shoes regardless of the transportation choice...
#52
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 19,000
Likes: 0
I think I'll put this here, since the thread title is peripherally about limited mobility. The RATP schematic bus map (which is otherwise useless unless you know exactly where you are and exactly where you want to go) and the bus map with streets have keys along the edge showing which bus lines run wheelchair-friendly vehicles.
Schematic, key at bottom:
http://www.ratp.info/orienter/f_plan...aux&fm=pdf
With streets, key at left:
http://www.ratp.info/orienter/f_plan...eur&fm=pdf
Schematic, key at bottom:
http://www.ratp.info/orienter/f_plan...aux&fm=pdf
With streets, key at left:
http://www.ratp.info/orienter/f_plan...eur&fm=pdf
#55
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,121
Likes: 0
They all have advantages and disadvantages.
The Métro is fast, immune to surface traffic, and serves the city quite well. However, it is not very scenic, it can be crowded at rush hour, and it involves walking up and down lots of stairs.
The RER is like the Métro, except that it is faster and serves fewer stations, with longer waits between trains.
The bus is scenic and has far more routes and stops than the Métro. However, it is slow and very vulnerable to surface traffic, it can be very crowded, and you need a new ticket if you change from one bus to another. It's also a much bumpier ride.
The Batobus is scenic and leisurely but serves the city very poorly indeed, with only a handful of stops, all on the river. And it's not part of the RATP, so you have to use special tickets that are not cheap. It's basically useless for transportation unless you are very lucky indeed.
Walking is free, extremely scenic, unaffected by traffic, uncrowded, and serves every single point in the city without exception. However, it is tiring, very slow, and requires that one be good at walking long distances.
Bicycles are scenic and fun, and moderately fast, but they are vulnerable to traffic, and one must constantly get on and off the bike, as intersections with other vehicles and pedestrians are legion. Bicycles also require that you do something with the bike if you take a break, which is easier said than done.
Cars are very comfortable and can go from point to point, but there is no place to park them, and in heavy traffic it make take several hours to go only a few kilometres. They are very expensive and aren't very practical overall. They are not the least bit scenic.
And so on.
The Métro is fast, immune to surface traffic, and serves the city quite well. However, it is not very scenic, it can be crowded at rush hour, and it involves walking up and down lots of stairs.
The RER is like the Métro, except that it is faster and serves fewer stations, with longer waits between trains.
The bus is scenic and has far more routes and stops than the Métro. However, it is slow and very vulnerable to surface traffic, it can be very crowded, and you need a new ticket if you change from one bus to another. It's also a much bumpier ride.
The Batobus is scenic and leisurely but serves the city very poorly indeed, with only a handful of stops, all on the river. And it's not part of the RATP, so you have to use special tickets that are not cheap. It's basically useless for transportation unless you are very lucky indeed.
Walking is free, extremely scenic, unaffected by traffic, uncrowded, and serves every single point in the city without exception. However, it is tiring, very slow, and requires that one be good at walking long distances.
Bicycles are scenic and fun, and moderately fast, but they are vulnerable to traffic, and one must constantly get on and off the bike, as intersections with other vehicles and pedestrians are legion. Bicycles also require that you do something with the bike if you take a break, which is easier said than done.
Cars are very comfortable and can go from point to point, but there is no place to park them, and in heavy traffic it make take several hours to go only a few kilometres. They are very expensive and aren't very practical overall. They are not the least bit scenic.
And so on.
#56
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,227
Likes: 0
I think that a mixture of all the means of transportation is finally the best advice
Though in my particular situation most metros and many buses (in Paris or everywhere) are not useful and I have to rely too much on taxis. But I still try to mix when I can, sometimes to save money, others time..and others just for my own mood
Though in my particular situation most metros and many buses (in Paris or everywhere) are not useful and I have to rely too much on taxis. But I still try to mix when I can, sometimes to save money, others time..and others just for my own mood
#57
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,605
Likes: 0
<i>The bus is scenic and has far more routes and stops than the Métro. However, it is slow and very vulnerable to surface traffic, it can be very crowded, and you need a new ticket if you change from one bus to another.</i>
RATP is changing the ticket method so that you can make transfers within a stated period of time on the same ticket. I don't remember when this is going into effect.
RATP is changing the ticket method so that you can make transfers within a stated period of time on the same ticket. I don't remember when this is going into effect.




