Normandy--I'm going nuts
#1
Original Poster
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Normandy--I'm going nuts
Because of certain time and planning constraints we are going down to Rennes by TGV arriving at about 5 p.m. Is St. Michel worth visiting and/or spending the night? I hear how busy and congested it is. Is it better to stay in St. Michel or not? We will leave by 11 the next day.And if not St. Michel, where would be a nice area to stay? I have serious positives and negatives aroud St. Marlo. Or is someplace else better? We are headed to Bayeux the following day.
#2
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,194
Likes: 0
What time of year? You have lots of hours of daylight left during much of the year. Even WITH heavy tourist traffic, it's a very special place, and though I have never stayed overnight ON the Mont, most people report that it becomes particularly enchanted at night when the number of tourists drops by 90%.
Best wishes,
Rex
Best wishes,
Rex
#3

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,359
Likes: 0
Le Mont St-Michel is certainly worth seeing--it's the #1 tourist destination in France! It can be congested and busy because there's really just one narrow street leading up from the village to the Abbey, but you'll manage.
With an arrival at Rennes at 5 p.m. you'll have just enough time to reach Mont St-Michel and have a quick look around. Staying the night would be very nice and allow you to see everything again the next morning, when tourist traffic is less--although the early evening will also be fine.
As for St-Malo, we never found it especially interesting, although we enjoyed our time in Dinard, just across the bay. But since you're heading to Bayeux the day after Le Mont St-Michel, there's no point backtracking.
With an arrival at Rennes at 5 p.m. you'll have just enough time to reach Mont St-Michel and have a quick look around. Staying the night would be very nice and allow you to see everything again the next morning, when tourist traffic is less--although the early evening will also be fine.
As for St-Malo, we never found it especially interesting, although we enjoyed our time in Dinard, just across the bay. But since you're heading to Bayeux the day after Le Mont St-Michel, there's no point backtracking.
#5
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,611
Likes: 0
.
But Robespierre, 5.6 million of those people were already spending time in Paris. The people made a point of going to Le Mont
Seriously, is is worth visitng and your time is perfect. You will get there after most of the visitors have left, be there for the evening (which I and many others think is the best time) and be able to visit visit the abbey in the morning.
The abbey does not get near as many tourists as the base of Le Mont and you will be there before the day tripping crowds arrive.
Keith
But Robespierre, 5.6 million of those people were already spending time in Paris. The people made a point of going to Le Mont

Seriously, is is worth visitng and your time is perfect. You will get there after most of the visitors have left, be there for the evening (which I and many others think is the best time) and be able to visit visit the abbey in the morning.
The abbey does not get near as many tourists as the base of Le Mont and you will be there before the day tripping crowds arrive.
Keith
#6
Original Poster
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Well, I have messed up on my train connections, and won't get into Rennes until almost 7, and so wouldn't even get to MSM until about 8. Is this still a good idea? Or should I just get in there the following morning and fight the crowds at about 11?
Trending Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TravelRibbon
Europe
5
May 9th, 2006 12:54 PM
adamsparks
Europe
18
May 25th, 2005 07:21 AM




