Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Europe
Reload this Page >

New forum format

Search

New forum format

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 31st, 2001, 08:03 PM
  #41  
Rex
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Before I go to bed...<BR><BR>one last comment...<BR><BR>thank you for your kind comments, ykias..<BR><BR>It's messages from people like you that are constant "words of encouragement" to me...<BR><BR>and yes... ykwia<BR>
 
Old Mar 31st, 2001, 08:32 PM
  #42  
Triple-O
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
nite nite, Rex...<BR><BR>thanks for your intrepid wanderings today. most helpful to all of us, even if you did take some of your secrets to bed with you tonite. <BR><BR>i'd say not a bad day, all in all, tho i feel bad for the people who aren't satisfied. i guess i'm happy this forum is so much faster that the other things don't matter as much.<BR><BR>ooo
 
Old Mar 31st, 2001, 10:29 PM
  #43  
ldsant
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Nice job Fodor's! This is MUCH better. Thank you to your team for making all of the improvements!
 
Old Apr 1st, 2001, 11:33 AM
  #44  
Pastey
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Yoo-hoo! This forum's working fine. <BR> <BR><BR>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR> <BR> <BR> <BR>Author: benny ([email protected]) <BR>Date: 04/01/2001, 01:20 pm ET<BR><BR>If you look at it logically, this forum is working fine. There are more than 100 Europe threads with replies today. People are asking/receiving advice on all sorts of trip possibilities, as they were before the change yesteday. And this forum is certainly faster than it was. I stopped coming for months because it was often like molasses. You had to wait and wait. Now things seem pretty zippy. <BR><BR>Oh well, it's just IMHO....<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR> <BR><BR><BR>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR><BR> <BR> <BR>Author: barb ([email protected]) <BR>Date: 04/01/2001, 01:33 pm ET<BR><BR>I'd second Benny on this. And add that it's the people on this forum that make it so great. All of them, even the nutcases, pedants, and otherwise irksome types. They give it flavor. I come on here even when I'm not going anywhere. It's just fun to find out what people are up to. <BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR><BR> <BR> <BR>Author: Rex ([email protected]) <BR>Date: 04/01/2001, 01:44 pm ET<BR><BR>Weel I guess my sentiments are already obvious, but this seems to be similar to the "Rants" and Raves" thread(s) - - and "we" let the Rants get way ahead (with the negative header "Does anyone else not like the new format?" - - even though the majority of opinions there ARE positive about the new changes).<BR><BR>Anyhow, I am all FOR some "piling on" here on THIS thread - - to show our appreciation and admiration for the changes.<BR><BR>Best wishes,<BR><BR>Rex<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR><BR> <BR> <BR>Author: Triple-O ([email protected]) <BR>Date: 04/01/2001, 01:47 pm ET<BR><BR>count me in favor too. there are pluses and minuses but the pluses way outweigh the minuses.<BR><BR><BR><BR>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR><BR> <BR> <BR>Author: tj ([email protected]) <BR>Date: 04/01/2001, 01:51 pm ET<BR><BR>Here, here!!<BR><BR>Right on, fodorsfolks!<BR><BR><BR><BR>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR><BR> <BR> <BR>Author: dennis ([email protected]) <BR>Date: 04/01/2001, 02:09 pm ET<BR><BR>Fine with everything. Don't think all that much has changed. Used to have a website of my own (it sadly bit the dust) and always tried to keep things as similar is possible when introducing change. Looks like they've done that here. Shows they're thinking about how things affect us.<BR><BR><BR><BR>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR><BR> <BR> <BR>Author: Judy ([email protected]) <BR>Date: 04/01/2001, 02:14 pm ET<BR><BR>Me too Rex.... yoo-hoo!<BR><BR><BR><BR>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR><BR> <BR> <BR>Author: wes fowler ([email protected]) <BR>Date: 04/01/2001, 02:45 pm ET<BR><BR>There are an awful lot of things to like about this revision to Fodors’ forums. I like the fact that Fodors was apparently totally responsive to the suggestions of the beta testers. I like the courtesy Fodors displayed in announcing the impending changes beforehand. I like the expanded “Search tips” and the elimination of drop down lists for searching. I like the speeded up search results. I like the ability to sort search results. I like the ability to jump from forum to forum with ease. I like the ability to “Jump to most recent posting” and “Mail to a friend”. I like the ability to respond to multiple postings without having to enter my name and Email address each time. I like the ability to hyperlink URLs, particularly the URLs of past postings which should eliminate or reduce the need for topper’s “toppings”. I like the ability to post a lengthy response; something not previously available.<BR><BR>The banners seem a small price to pay for a much improved resource. I have no dislikes or significant negatives but do have a thought or two regarding the search capability. It’s apparent that some users of the former search function are confused by the elimination of drop down lists and directives in the frame to do a text and/or place search. I think newcomers to the forum may not recognize the significance of the “flying figure” logo as an enter button and may assume that “Search tips” will lead them to a thread directly.<BR><BR>All in all, a job well done and one deserving of thanks and appreciation.<BR><BR>I've posted this to the grab bag, as well, since these comments more properly belong there.<BR><BR><BR><BR>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR><BR> <BR> <BR>Author: Joe ([email protected]) <BR>Date: 04/01/2001, 02:46 pm ET<BR><BR>Kudos to fodors.com. Only took two trys without a online beta test that I am aware of. The fun has returned.<BR><BR><BR><BR>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR><BR> <BR> <BR>Author: Ms. X ([email protected]) <BR>Date: 04/01/2001, 02:59 pm ET<BR><BR>There were two beta tests, one in Dec. before the unsuccessful launch in January, and one a couple of weeks ago. Fodors was very attentive to our comments and also took very seriously all the things the users wrote in about during the brief moments this new version was up in January. <BR><BR>I came away with great respect for everyone on the Fodors team from the beta testing. It doesn't mean they're perfect, but they do care about how every last user might be impacted. One of the beta testers thought they were going overboard, but I think you can tell from the last couple of days they probably were right to be as concerned as they were, because everyone has different computers, browsers, browser versions, Web TV, whatever. There are a lot of variables. <BR><BR>Ms. X (but you know me by another name....)<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR><BR> <BR> <BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><B R><BR>
 
Old Apr 1st, 2001, 11:49 AM
  #45  
Big lottery a'comin' - - everyone will want in the pool, trying to guess who
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear Ms. e (whoops, I mean X)<BR><BR>Thanks for the inside look at how they treated you as a beta tester. But why (are they) so mum in public, here on this forum? Not a word posted - - not even on the grab bag forum. Maybe tomorrow? (a regular "workday" for those who make this their salaried job - - as opposed to those who make it their unsalaried job).<BR><BR>Curiously, I assume that we can reference URL's across forums, right?<BR><BR>http://www.fodors.com/forums/messages.cfm?fid=326&amp;tid=1286312&amp;numrespon ses=66<BR><BR>"fid=326" is presumably for Grab Bag forum<BR><BR>Click here for <BR><BR>"What do you think of the new Travel Talk format?" on the Grab bag forum.<BR><BR>Best...<BR><BR>R<BR>
 
Old Apr 1st, 2001, 12:14 PM
  #46  
Ms. X
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Actually, it was the beta testers who requested anonymity. I think Fodors assumed we'd want say who we were, but some of the testers preferred to remain just regular users to everybody on the forums. They didn't want people to think that they thought they were elevated in status. It sort of makes sense if you think about it.<BR><BR>But Fodors has mentioned in several places I've seen that there was testing. I think the "changes" letter mentions that there was testing.
 
Old Apr 1st, 2001, 12:56 PM
  #47  
s.fowler
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I'm not going to hide -- my style is probably pretty transparent anyway. I was one of the beta testers and it is *my* recollection that it was FODORS who asked us to keep quiet so that general fodorite community wouldn't feel left out. The betas were actually running in tandem with the old forums. We'd post using the beta and would appear in both the beta and the old version. So there isn't a whole set of posts out there homeless
 
Old Apr 29th, 2001, 10:24 PM
  #48  
topper
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
hard to believe that this was just a month ago <BR> <BR>
 
Old Apr 29th, 2001, 10:30 PM
  #49  
get
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Gee, now who in the world could hve topped yet another old thread, this time about beta testing???? <BR> <BR>Hmmmmmm, let me think......
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -