Need advice on two hotels in London
Dec 4th, 2008, 08:14 AM
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Need advice on two hotels in London
Coming to London in March, I can get a great price on the Millennium Gloucester or Baileys through Londontown.com. Baileys would be about $20 more per day. Any opinions on which is the better choice?
thanks
thanks
Dec 4th, 2008, 08:42 AM
#2
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 25,978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They are right next to one another. Baileys is a restored hotel, with more "charm", whereas Gloucester is more of a business hotel.
Have you checked tripadvisor to see what the reviews are for both of them?
Have you checked tripadvisor to see what the reviews are for both of them?
Dec 4th, 2008, 12:32 PM
#3
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I liked the Bailey's much better than the Gloucester. It seemed very strange at the G. to walk through old fashioned oak doors into a room furnished in Oriental-modern. Both are good hotels, though, in a super location.
Yesterday, I got an offer from some internet site for the Bailey's at a very good price that included an upgrade from a standard room plus breakfast. It said you could contact the hotel directly.
Yesterday, I got an offer from some internet site for the Bailey's at a very good price that included an upgrade from a standard room plus breakfast. It said you could contact the hotel directly.
Dec 7th, 2008, 12:42 PM
#5
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have stayed at both hotels more than once. A $20 difference would tip me to the Gloucester. If the price is the same I would go with Baileys for the "charm" factor. They are both fine hotels in a decent location.
