London to Venice: Plane or Train?
#1
Original Poster
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
London to Venice: Plane or Train?
We are flying "open jaws" Seattle to Oslo and spend aboput 4 days in Norway. We will then fly to London and spend a week and a half in England. We then head to Italy for 2 weeks. We will spend time in Umbria, Tuscany (Florence, Siena)and Venice. Question #1: What is the best(and cost effective) way to get to Italy from England....plane or train? I thought we'd do Venice 1st, followed by Florence and Siena and then fly out from Milan? Does anyone have any better suggestions? I don't care the order of our stay in Italy, just trying to do what makes most since logistically. Thanks.
#2
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,699
Likes: 0
Hi trav,
To go by train you would have to take the Eurostar to Paris and train from there - which is not such a terrible thing; you could reduce England by a few days.
You can also fly to Venice from LGW or LHR.
See www.whichbudget.com
To go by train you would have to take the Eurostar to Paris and train from there - which is not such a terrible thing; you could reduce England by a few days.
You can also fly to Venice from LGW or LHR.
See www.whichbudget.com
#4
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,552
Likes: 0
The most cost effective way to get from the UK to Venice is via one of the low cost carriers which fly into either Venice marco polo airport (Easy Jet) or Treviso (Ryan Air) which is close to Venice.There may be other carriers too.
Of these two I think Easy Jet is superior and they fly from Gatwick while Ryan air flies from Stansted and or Luton. There are a number of others who fly from regional airports in the UK so it depends on where you are.
Remember, it important to know the disadvantages of these carriers...high overweight charges, you MUST check in 40 minutes in advance, no advances seating assignment, very limited customer service etc. You can do a search on the board for tons more info on this. However, if you're well informed this is certainly the cheapest one way between UK and Venice.
Good luck!
Of these two I think Easy Jet is superior and they fly from Gatwick while Ryan air flies from Stansted and or Luton. There are a number of others who fly from regional airports in the UK so it depends on where you are.
Remember, it important to know the disadvantages of these carriers...high overweight charges, you MUST check in 40 minutes in advance, no advances seating assignment, very limited customer service etc. You can do a search on the board for tons more info on this. However, if you're well informed this is certainly the cheapest one way between UK and Venice.
Good luck!
#5
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 17,268
Likes: 0
The best way from London to Italy is undoubtedly the train.
If you're not burdened with a lot of luggage, an afternoon Eurostar to Paris, decent dinner someewhere nice, overnight train timed so you're coming through the Italian side of the Alps by daylight, then lunch in Milan beats the living seatbelts out of being crammed into an Easyjet to Treviso.
Sadly, it costs about ten times as much as Easyjet. But you're on holiday, aren't you?
If you're not burdened with a lot of luggage, an afternoon Eurostar to Paris, decent dinner someewhere nice, overnight train timed so you're coming through the Italian side of the Alps by daylight, then lunch in Milan beats the living seatbelts out of being crammed into an Easyjet to Treviso.
Sadly, it costs about ten times as much as Easyjet. But you're on holiday, aren't you?
Trending Topics
#8
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,527
Likes: 0
I will be trying out Easy Jet from Gatwick to Marco Polo/Venice in a couple of weeks. Compared flights through whichbudget.com (as mentioned in a previous post) and decided on Easy Jet over Ryan Air (which had a slightly cheaper flight) due to better airports for us in both London and Venice, and slightly bigger carry on baggage weight allowance.
I'll report back when I return!
I love arriving in Venice on the train, though...walking out of the station takes my breath away.
Good luck with your plans.
I'll report back when I return!
I love arriving in Venice on the train, though...walking out of the station takes my breath away.
Good luck with your plans.
#9
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 12,188
Likes: 0
In terms of time, there is no comparison. I took BMI, and it was reasonably cheap: http://www.flybmi.com
#10
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
We are traveling to Venice, Marco Polo Airport, on Easyjet of out Gatwick in June. I checked out many flights options, but did not consider the train because of the time it would take and expense. We are traveling with our kids.
I know there was a previous post about a site that compares the low cost carriers in Europe. I think it was www.whichbudget.com I remember looking at it after I had already booked and it made me feel better that I got the best deal.
Have a good trip.
Travelatte
I know there was a previous post about a site that compares the low cost carriers in Europe. I think it was www.whichbudget.com I remember looking at it after I had already booked and it made me feel better that I got the best deal.
Have a good trip.
Travelatte
#12
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,749
Likes: 0
I'm looking at BMI for Venice to London and yes, it is quite cheap if you can book well in advance, and unlike some of the other budget carriers, the times are so much better (no getting up at 4 AM to catch a plane) and I believe you're less restricted on the luggage weight.
As much as I LOVE train travel, I don't enjoy sleeping on a train at all, so for me this is a no-brainer. I'd fly!
As much as I LOVE train travel, I don't enjoy sleeping on a train at all, so for me this is a no-brainer. I'd fly!



