London gallery for children
#1
Original Poster
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,056
Likes: 0
London gallery for children
Hi,
Which would be your top pick for an art gallery for children age 10 and 11? Preferably one with a mix of eras from early to contemporary. Free entry as well.
National gallery doesn't have contemporary. The Tate has split the modern art out to separate gallery. Anyone got any suggestions?
Thanks!
Which would be your top pick for an art gallery for children age 10 and 11? Preferably one with a mix of eras from early to contemporary. Free entry as well.
National gallery doesn't have contemporary. The Tate has split the modern art out to separate gallery. Anyone got any suggestions?
Thanks!
#2
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,523
Likes: 0
#6
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 0
Trending Topics
#8
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 17,268
Likes: 0
Well done: you've managed to find an unsolvable brief. There's hardly a free art gallery with traditional and modern art in London.
The National Portrait Gallery DOES have paintings from the 14th to the 21st century: that's its whole point. If the children have a bent for history (or modern life) the storyline might well keep their attention longer than most. galleries. Or it might be so much not what they want, it turns them off. Tate Britain DOES have earlyish British stuff , as well as cutting-edge contemporary - but it doesn't start till 1500, and you might think its focus on British art is a bit restricting.
The Wallace Collection expressly DOESN'T: it's essentially a 19th century collection, and there's scarcely anything been added for yonks, or from later than about 1850. The Courtauld fails as being neither free nor interested in anything afer about 1900.
You could try one of the major provincial art galleries - like the Walker in Liverpool - but I suspect that's off brief too.
The National Portrait Gallery DOES have paintings from the 14th to the 21st century: that's its whole point. If the children have a bent for history (or modern life) the storyline might well keep their attention longer than most. galleries. Or it might be so much not what they want, it turns them off. Tate Britain DOES have earlyish British stuff , as well as cutting-edge contemporary - but it doesn't start till 1500, and you might think its focus on British art is a bit restricting.
The Wallace Collection expressly DOESN'T: it's essentially a 19th century collection, and there's scarcely anything been added for yonks, or from later than about 1850. The Courtauld fails as being neither free nor interested in anything afer about 1900.
You could try one of the major provincial art galleries - like the Walker in Liverpool - but I suspect that's off brief too.
#9
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 17,268
Likes: 0
Incidentally, the curent Rude Britannia show at Tate Britain covers mildly filthy art (well not really filthy: Donald McGill and Hogarth sort of stuff) from about 1600 to date.
It would have been RIGHT up my street when I was 10.
It would have been RIGHT up my street when I was 10.
#10
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,588
Likes: 0
If you were in Glasgow then Kelvingrove would do it....free (as most museums and galleries here)and has a real mixture of things, some Art a Spitfire (WW2 plane) hung from the ceiling and a whole bunch of interactive children's stuff
#12
Original Poster
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,056
Likes: 0
Thanks for the suggestions, we decided on The Tate for yesterday. Had a nice little walk round Big Ben/Houses of Parliament area first then along the river to the Tate. There was enough variety there to keep their interest for an hour or so, but that was about it. The Tate had a summer holiday 'art trolley' where kids can help themselves to drawing/modelling stuff so they then spent a happy 30 minutes building paper models of the Fiona Banner piece - 2 real war planes (one hanging point down from the ceiling, 1 upside down on the floor, don't ask me, i don't 'get' this sort of stuff).
I don't think it was quite what they were expecting but I did my best to get them to think and talk about what they were seeing.
I think they enjoyed going on the tube for the first time most of all
I don't think it was quite what they were expecting but I did my best to get them to think and talk about what they were seeing.
I think they enjoyed going on the tube for the first time most of all
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jgg
Europe
9
Mar 3rd, 2006 04:38 AM



