Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Europe
Reload this Page >

London:Central Park Hotel or the Caesar Hotel??

Search

London:Central Park Hotel or the Caesar Hotel??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 19th, 2004, 05:09 PM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
London:Central Park Hotel or the Caesar Hotel??

Am travelling to London in the next few weeks and wonder if anyone has any knowledge of/experience with either of these hotels. (Both are located in the "Bayswater" area)

Cleanliness? Safe neighbourhood? or any other pertinent info.

Thanks in advance.
margola is offline  
Old Nov 19th, 2004, 05:43 PM
  #2  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't have anything specific to say about either of these hotels - have you checked on tripadvisor.com? However generally I do not like the Bayswater area - having stayed there one night I have avoided it ever since.
It's convenient enough to things but just a little more rundown-feeling than the areas I prefer. But I'm sure some will disagree with me.
taggie is offline  
Old Nov 19th, 2004, 11:25 PM
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I tend to agree w/ taggie. Bayswater/Paddington is not near any sites to speak of (except Hyde Park/Kens Gardens of course). Its main claim to fame is an abundance of inexpensive B&Bs and small hotels. But for the same money you can usually find just as good of rooms in more convenient locations (Victoria, Russell Square, South Kens, etc).

There are a few nice hotels right on Bayswater Road near the Lancaster Gate tube station -- but they are not cheap and for the money I'd still rather stay elsewhere.
janis is offline  
Old Nov 20th, 2004, 10:01 AM
  #4  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Firstly, I wouldn't say it's that bad if you are paying a very low price. However, it'd be better if you'd advise your budget as I'd like to be able to suggest some alternatives.

As an area, it has high property prices, it's not dumpy, it's not my style, but it's not rough! It's more central than Victoria where so many of your choose to stay!
m_kingdom2 is offline  
Old Nov 20th, 2004, 11:54 AM
  #5  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
m kingdom2,

thanks for response.

my budget is roughly 50-55 pounds daily
rate.

am concerned about area & locale...would really appreciate any
suggested alternatives in that range.
first vist...want to be close to city
attractions & trasnportation.
thanks for any help you might offer. times is of the essence.

margola
margola is offline  
Old Nov 20th, 2004, 11:57 AM
  #6  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Please note that I'm not making specific recommendations for the properties, but you will be fine staying in that area. Your budget is very, very low, so Bayswater will be an excellent compromise situation.
m_kingdom2 is offline  
Old Nov 20th, 2004, 01:55 PM
  #7  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 12,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not to be repetitive (but I will be), Priceline might get you a 4* hotel for that price. See http://www.betterbidding.com and http://www.biddingfortravel.com
WillTravel is offline  
Old Nov 20th, 2004, 04:42 PM
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,067
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I stayed across the street from the Central Park Hotel a couple of years ago. So I don't know anything about the hotel itself but I liked the area. Five minute walk from two diffrent tube stations on convenient lines. Queensway is a busy street a couple of blocks away and it has lots of inexpensive places to eat. Whitley's shopping area is there (Marks and Spencer, etc). Kensington Garden is half a block from the hotel. I've opted to stay in the same area for my visit to London (March) because I do like that area. The Central Park was kind of ugly modern from the outside but looked nice enough.
isabel is offline  
Old Nov 21st, 2004, 10:32 AM
  #9  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 17,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Britain's major national newspapers rarely discuss run of the mill London hotels: they assume all their readers live in London anyway.

But today's The Sunday Times - the most-read quality paper - carries a horrid mini-review of The Caesar, together with the claim that most coverage of it on Trip Advisor is equally negative.
flanneruk is offline  
Old Nov 21st, 2004, 03:08 PM
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I read a trip report last year on the AOL London board from a traveler who stayed at the Central Park Hotel (booked thru a British Airways package deal) and she was very disappointed in the hotel.

Kayb95 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kr
Europe
9
Jan 28th, 2006 03:23 AM
Joanel
Europe
6
Dec 22nd, 2004 06:54 PM
Skaye
Europe
25
Feb 9th, 2004 06:43 AM
elliepd
Europe
10
Jan 18th, 2004 07:23 AM
Jon
Europe
11
Dec 23rd, 2002 08:27 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -