Search

Lido vs Venice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 23rd, 2003 | 03:28 AM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Lido vs Venice

Hi - I'm heading to Venice next week (end of Oct) and noticed that the prices of hotels on the Lido are very inexpensive (I'm assuming because of the time of year)

Never having been before, does it make sense to stay out there and just use the vaporetto & water taxis to go to Venice?

Thanks!
sportycanuck is offline  
Old Oct 23rd, 2003 | 03:53 AM
  #2  
rex
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,194
Likes: 0
In general, I would say no. I have stayed on the Lido twice and in Venice three times. The one time that it made sense was with a bunch of teenagers on a very tight budget - - staying on the Lido made it possible to stay two nights when the budget would not have allowed that in Venice.

But so much of the magic is IN Venice - - and the two best hours of the day are literally the first hour after awakening (get out and see the city wake up before you even shower or have breakfast) - - and the last hour before you go to bed. That's when you will truly understand "La Serenissima".

Best wishes,

Rex
rex is offline  
Old Oct 23rd, 2003 | 04:35 AM
  #3  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,749
Likes: 0
Rex is 100% right.
Patrick is offline  
Old Oct 23rd, 2003 | 04:36 AM
  #4  
ira
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,699
Likes: 0
Hi sc,

A water taxi will use up all of the money you saved by staying on the Lido.
ira is offline  
Old Oct 23rd, 2003 | 04:48 AM
  #5  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,098
Likes: 0
If your budget militates staying on the Lido, it's better than nothing--though I might go with something on Murano instead of the Lido. The Lido is a beach resort with a totally different feel from historic Venice. I agree with the prior posters that it is a much better experience to stay in historic Venice if you can at all afford it, even if you stay in a more basic hotel to reduce costs.
RufusTFirefly is offline  
Old Oct 23rd, 2003 | 04:50 AM
  #6  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,299
Likes: 0
I agree with the previous posters.
If you try venere.com or veniceby.com you will find hotels/B&B in every price category.
MyriamC is offline  
Old Oct 23rd, 2003 | 05:34 AM
  #7  
DRJ
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 0
When I visit New York I don't stay in Newark.
DRJ is offline  
Old Oct 23rd, 2003 | 12:19 PM
  #8  
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 0
I don't see the comparison at all between New York and Newark. The Lido is a nice safe area that would make a good base - buy a boat pass good for all of the Venice area and commuting costs are not much. Not all hotels in Venice have great canal views, the inexpensive ones I've stayed in have views of dark alleys.
PalenqueBob is offline  
Old Oct 23rd, 2003 | 12:25 PM
  #9  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,696
Likes: 0
I'd stay in Venice. I've stayed in Lido before, a and the room was inexpensive and fine. But, it takes a long time to get back and forth to Venice. By the time you wait for the boat, and take the boat, it can be 45 minutes. That can be a long time when you are tired and just want to rest in your room for a while.
rialtogrl is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Versus
Europe
10
Mar 3rd, 2007 03:28 PM
leahinsc
Europe
15
Aug 25th, 2006 11:11 AM
anavert
Europe
4
Apr 14th, 2005 06:49 PM
cmorey
Europe
6
Mar 7th, 2005 03:32 PM
david
Europe
7
Oct 18th, 2002 06:53 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -