Notices

itinerary needed: Milan vs Rome

Old May 9th, 2005, 10:52 AM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
itinerary needed: Milan vs Rome

Hi all, I am torn between Milan and Rome. I kinda need a 9 day itinerary, flying in and out of Bologna. I think it only makes sense to spend 2-3 days each in Venice and Florence, which leaves me with either Milan or Rome for another 2-3 days. I think Rome is a bit far, and 2-3 days probably isn't enough. I am a big shopper so I am leaning towards Milan. However, I think Milan can be combined with a future trip to France, while Rome doesn't work too well with any future trip easily. I know clearly that I won't be able to cover the whole Italy in 9 days so I have to give one up. I've been to Rome but I was very young then and didn't remember much. Suggestions?
weruio1 is offline  
Old May 9th, 2005, 10:57 AM
  #2  
ira
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,680
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi we,

Didn't I answer this on the other forum?

ira is offline  
Old May 9th, 2005, 10:59 AM
  #3  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rome, by all means. Rome is a fabulous city and I definitely would go to Rome rather than Milan if I had 3 days. You won't be able to experience everything Rome has to offer in 3 days but you can get a good start. And Rome isn't so far; as I recall it is 3 hours by train from Florence.
mamc is offline  
Old May 9th, 2005, 12:40 PM
  #4  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hi ira, yes i am trying to solicit more opinions before i decide... thanks all!
weruio1 is offline  
Old May 9th, 2005, 12:52 PM
  #5  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've been to both & would definitely pick Rome. There is amazing shopping there, plus there are tremendous sites to see. (not that Milan doesn't, but Rome is much more enticing)
Bpesta is offline  
Old May 9th, 2005, 02:50 PM
  #6  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Most definitly ROME,.3 days at least .Its got everything,not that Milan does not its just that Milan is more of a commercial city with some historical sights whereas Rome is a historical city full of sights ,sounds ,atmosphere and some commercial aspects with just as much shopping as milan.
VENICE needs 3 of your days and FLORENCE the balance
Its easy to get around by train and very quick so you wont waste too much time .
Save the rest of Italy for the many journeys you will want to make back there.ENJOY!
touristblob is offline  
Old May 9th, 2005, 02:53 PM
  #7  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rome.

Ira, what was your answer on the other forum?
Grasshopper is offline  
Old May 10th, 2005, 04:21 AM
  #8  
ira
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,680
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Split the 9 days between Florence and Venice.

Save Rome for another visit.

ira is offline  
Old May 10th, 2005, 04:22 AM
  #9  
ira
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,680
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi wer,

I am so upset that you would want to solicit other opinions when I have given you the absolutely best possible advice, that I am going to go sulk.










ira is offline  
Old May 10th, 2005, 10:51 AM
  #10  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ira, don't be! think about rome, think about europe... there! happy again
weruio1 is offline  
Old May 10th, 2005, 10:57 AM
  #11  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
new question:
i started to look at hotels / b&b in venice since i was told that it's much easier to find one in florence / rome / milan that i should focus my energy on venice. it seems that everything is terribly expensive! my only requirements are non smoking rooms and private bathrooms, and budget around 100 euro for a double. do i have to up my budget to find one? thanks!
(ok this is also on frommers so ira, pick one )
weruio1 is offline  
Old May 10th, 2005, 11:28 AM
  #12  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK, I say this with the greatest respect for Ira, who is a valued poster here. However, isn't it fair to advise the OP that you've not spent any time in either Rome or Milan before you recommend they stay away from both? I think it skews your frame of reference a little. Since you've (Ira) said before that you just don't have any interest in either it puts a different spin on your recommendation. While it would be wonderful to spend a full week in Rome, 2 or 3 days is a good start.

As for accommodations under 100 euro, Ira's recommendations for Florence and Venice are great places to start. I'm going to search my Rome files for that city. It's definitely do-able.
Grasshopper is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pgriffin
Europe
17
Nov 20th, 2012 08:56 AM
albaelena
Europe
4
Nov 11th, 2008 10:41 AM
dosu
Europe
8
Jun 28th, 2007 01:00 PM
rlewis5502
Europe
4
Dec 3rd, 2006 08:41 AM
Libby_Nash
Europe
5
Apr 16th, 2003 04:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

FODOR'S VIDEO