If you could go anywhere in the world you haven't already been, where would you go?
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
There are so many places I have not been that such a list would go on forever. However, some would be: <BR> <BR>GREECE, especially Thessaloniki (or Salonika as we Sephardic Jews call it) where my great-grandparents are from <BR>Israel <BR>Egypt <BR>Turkey <BR>Morocco <BR>Italy <BR>Norway <BR>Iceland <BR>Germany <BR>Greenland (don't ask me why - my husband thinks I'm thoroughly nuts)
#24
Guest
Posts: n/a
Now well into my eighth decade, I look at these lists and am amazed that my wife and I have seen almost all of them. And yet, one big one remains because tour companies skimp on the time we can spend there, giving only a few hours at most. I am talking about The Hermitage Museum in St. Petersburg. Like the Louvre, it is -- so I am told -- a place to savor, to wander, to return to. Instead, it's "we have two hours here, and then we must be moving on." And I simply won't pay good money to be stampeded or herded that way.
#26
Guest
Posts: n/a
We have been everywhere, (almost, Saudi,Yemen, Africa, Asia, China and Thailand,Japan, all parts of Europe except Prague, Canada, etc. Now we are thinking of seeing a bit of home...like Banff, the Rockies (again!), Maine, the Maritimes, the interior of Oregon, Washington, etc. The one foreign place I still want to see is South America.
#27
Guest
Posts: n/a
Don't know if I can put these in order without a lot of thought, but I think Australia would be #1. Variety and lots of natural beauty. I would prefer 3-4 weeks though. <BR> <BR>The others: <BR>New Guinea <BR>Tahiti - my wife would absolutely love it <BR>Galapagos <BR>Peru <BR>Nepal/Tibet <BR>Mongolia - I would not touch a marmot (well, probably not) <BR>Tikal, Guatemala and surrounding ruins <BR>New Zealand <BR>Italy (yes, you know I really want to go, but Europe is not as hard to afford as others) <BR>Egypt <BR>Kenya or South Africa <BR>India <BR>Thailand <BR>Costa Rica <BR> <BR> <BR>


