Hotel Room Types - What's the difference?
#1
Original Poster
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Hotel Room Types - What's the difference?
I am planning a trip to Italy in 2005 and have been researching hotels online. I am confused by the different room types.
What is the difference between single, double, double single use, twin, triple and quadruple room types? I will be traveling with my husband and another couple. To save money, we are considering sharing a room in one city. How would I ask for a room that can accomodate 4 people? Thanks!
What is the difference between single, double, double single use, twin, triple and quadruple room types? I will be traveling with my husband and another couple. To save money, we are considering sharing a room in one city. How would I ask for a room that can accomodate 4 people? Thanks!
#2
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 12,188
Likes: 0
All the names are just as they sound. They hold exactly as many people as stated.
For two couples, you would want a quad.
My personal opinion - I would try to economize elsewhere, and I would get two double rooms. European hotel rooms are small generally, and the usual reason for a quad room would be for two parents and two children - not four adults.
For two couples, you would want a quad.
My personal opinion - I would try to economize elsewhere, and I would get two double rooms. European hotel rooms are small generally, and the usual reason for a quad room would be for two parents and two children - not four adults.
#3
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
If you do inquire about quads, do also inquire about the types of beds in the room--you would have to say that you want a room for four people, and two large beds
there may not necessarily be two doubles, there could be, just for example, one double, one single, and a rollaway or, one double plus a sofabed, or one double and two twins
there may not necessarily be two doubles, there could be, just for example, one double, one single, and a rollaway or, one double plus a sofabed, or one double and two twins
#5
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,872
Likes: 0
Pretty self-explanatory
single - room for one person
double - room for two people in one bed
double single use - a double room but charging extra for one person using it (a single supplement)
twin - a room for 2 in two beds
triple - a room for 3 (could be 2 beds or three singles)
quadruple - a room for 4 (could be 2 beds, 3 beds, or 4 twin beds)
There are often also rooms listed as "double/twin". These are twin beds that can be zipped together into one large double. So they are usable by a couple or by two single people.
single - room for one person
double - room for two people in one bed
double single use - a double room but charging extra for one person using it (a single supplement)
twin - a room for 2 in two beds
triple - a room for 3 (could be 2 beds or three singles)
quadruple - a room for 4 (could be 2 beds, 3 beds, or 4 twin beds)
There are often also rooms listed as "double/twin". These are twin beds that can be zipped together into one large double. So they are usable by a couple or by two single people.
#7
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,872
Likes: 0
Not so, christina: Many, many places charge per person double occupancy. When one person wants to stay in a double room he/she will usually have to pay more than what a single room costs in the same hotel.
Now this doesn't usually happen in large city centre or chain hotels - but whenever you see a listing that says something like "double single use" or "single occupancy of a double/twin" you are essentially paying a single supplement . . . . .
Now this doesn't usually happen in large city centre or chain hotels - but whenever you see a listing that says something like "double single use" or "single occupancy of a double/twin" you are essentially paying a single supplement . . . . .
Trending Topics
#10

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,725
Likes: 0
Last year in Rome, Florence and Venice I shared a quad with 3 other women to save expenses.
Keeping in mind that it was to save expenses, it wasn't a bad experience. Most of our rooms were of a decent size - we weren't tripping over each other.
The main issue was the single bathroom - it takes some coordinating to figure out how to coordinate everyone's bathroom time without it taking 3 hours to get out for the day. Another issue was taking a shower - when you're used to jumping in the shower when you feel like it, waiting for 3 other people to finish is a bit of a drag.
Besides the showering issue, none of us really took very long to get ready in the morning, so it worked ok. If anyone in your party takes a LONG time to get ready, you might rather go with a separate room for each couple.
Keeping in mind that it was to save expenses, it wasn't a bad experience. Most of our rooms were of a decent size - we weren't tripping over each other.
The main issue was the single bathroom - it takes some coordinating to figure out how to coordinate everyone's bathroom time without it taking 3 hours to get out for the day. Another issue was taking a shower - when you're used to jumping in the shower when you feel like it, waiting for 3 other people to finish is a bit of a drag.
Besides the showering issue, none of us really took very long to get ready in the morning, so it worked ok. If anyone in your party takes a LONG time to get ready, you might rather go with a separate room for each couple.
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
e17345
Europe
12
Oct 18th, 2005 09:47 AM




