Fur coats in London...or anywhere else
#1
Original Poster
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Fur coats in London...or anywhere else
My husband and I are planning another visit to London and another couple will be with us. We are planning to be there at the end of November and the first part of December. The wife of the couple really thinks she needs to bring her mink coat. I have a fox fur coat but no one where we live ever wears fur even if it is real cold outside. My question is...should I just let her do her thing or encourage her to leave it at home? I don't want to hurt her feelings or offend her. We live in Texas and we consider ourselves blessed if we see any flakes of snow once every 10 years. We live in the lower part of Texas where we hardly have any cold weather and often we have our air conditioners on in November, December, January. I really appreciate any comments that will be offered.
#4
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,421
Likes: 0
Why not just let her do her thing? It sounds like she's looking for an excuse to wear her mink...
When we were in London over Thanksgiving, we were thrilled to have our waterproof/windproof down coats, as it's important to us be be comfortable while out and about, so as to be able to see and do as much as possible.
A mink is heavy, you have to be "careful", and get out of the rain. Not very practical.
When we were in London over Thanksgiving, we were thrilled to have our waterproof/windproof down coats, as it's important to us be be comfortable while out and about, so as to be able to see and do as much as possible.
A mink is heavy, you have to be "careful", and get out of the rain. Not very practical.
#6
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,719
Likes: 0
Fur coats are far more common (and dare I say accepted) in Spain than in the UK. Attitudes towards animal rights issues in the two countries are very different indeed.
Although fur is making something of a comeback in the UK (mostly rabbit fur as trim), many people feel very strongly about the wearing of fur and your friend should be prepared for some negative or hostile comments (at the very least). Personally I'd advise her to leave it at home.
Another concern is that fur coats tend to scream money and if the wearer is a tourist, there's a chance that they will be seen as a particularly lucrative target for bag snatchers, pickpockets etc.
Although fur is making something of a comeback in the UK (mostly rabbit fur as trim), many people feel very strongly about the wearing of fur and your friend should be prepared for some negative or hostile comments (at the very least). Personally I'd advise her to leave it at home.
Another concern is that fur coats tend to scream money and if the wearer is a tourist, there's a chance that they will be seen as a particularly lucrative target for bag snatchers, pickpockets etc.
#7
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 17,268
Likes: 0
Fur coats should not, under any circumstances whatsoever, be worn in Britain.
They're unnecessary in the first place: the problem here is chilly rain. That requires light rainproofing, not heavy furs - especially in late autumn. when you're planning to visit. And that's the real reason no-one, except for the occasional insensitive opera goer from Milan or Vienna, wears them.
More importantly, there's a significant group of deranged animal rights supporters in Britain. There is a real (though not huge) chance a fur coat will be slashed, have paint thrown at it or be vandalised in some way. There's a higher (and quite likely)chance a fur coat wearer will become an object of public derision or moderate roughing from mainstream London louts.
And she'll get little sympathy or help from Londoners. Because fur coats are irrelevant here, the overwhelming majority opinion is that the fur trade is built on unnecessary cruelty to animals, and that fur wearers are complicit in this cruelty. And are flashy show-offs, which is a much greater social offence here than making animals suffer.
So although 99.9% of us think fur coat slashers are criminals, 99.8% will think that their victims asked for it.
Whether you approve of this view is irrelevant to this question. If she wants to keep her mink intact, and to avoid being a public laughing stock, leave the furs in Texas.
They're unnecessary in the first place: the problem here is chilly rain. That requires light rainproofing, not heavy furs - especially in late autumn. when you're planning to visit. And that's the real reason no-one, except for the occasional insensitive opera goer from Milan or Vienna, wears them.
More importantly, there's a significant group of deranged animal rights supporters in Britain. There is a real (though not huge) chance a fur coat will be slashed, have paint thrown at it or be vandalised in some way. There's a higher (and quite likely)chance a fur coat wearer will become an object of public derision or moderate roughing from mainstream London louts.
And she'll get little sympathy or help from Londoners. Because fur coats are irrelevant here, the overwhelming majority opinion is that the fur trade is built on unnecessary cruelty to animals, and that fur wearers are complicit in this cruelty. And are flashy show-offs, which is a much greater social offence here than making animals suffer.
So although 99.9% of us think fur coat slashers are criminals, 99.8% will think that their victims asked for it.
Whether you approve of this view is irrelevant to this question. If she wants to keep her mink intact, and to avoid being a public laughing stock, leave the furs in Texas.
Trending Topics
#11
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,585
Likes: 0
#12

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,269
Likes: 0
If you don't pass these comments on to her as your opinion, why should she feel offended by you?
I can see it might be a bit sensitive if you're worried you'll get backlash if she does wear it and something unpleasant happens.
But you could say people who live in London say she'd probably be uncomfortably warm in it and not wear it more than once anyway.
I can see it might be a bit sensitive if you're worried you'll get backlash if she does wear it and something unpleasant happens.
But you could say people who live in London say she'd probably be uncomfortably warm in it and not wear it more than once anyway.
#14
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,056
Likes: 0
Just confirming what everone else has said
1)The UK is more wet than cold at that time of year - fur is not practical
2) There is a strong anti-fur feeling here, she is very likely to get nasty looks and comments.
3) people will assume she is very wealthy - not good for a tourist.
1)The UK is more wet than cold at that time of year - fur is not practical
2) There is a strong anti-fur feeling here, she is very likely to get nasty looks and comments.
3) people will assume she is very wealthy - not good for a tourist.
#15
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,323
Likes: 0
If she wants to wear a fur coat then let her wear it. Fur is luxurious, classic, and elegant... on the right person of course.
As for anti-fur sentiments, ignore these stupid people who have nothing better to do in life. Do we see them running into butchers and throwing steaks out of the door? No.
As for anti-fur sentiments, ignore these stupid people who have nothing better to do in life. Do we see them running into butchers and throwing steaks out of the door? No.

