Frog RIP
#41
On the other thread on this subject, I think it was Cholmondley Warner who said Aussies are called Tea Leaves. It's been on my mind - what is that? Tea leaf = thief? Tea leaf = ???
(Not insulted, merely curious. We Austalians are thick skinned.)
Kay
(Not insulted, merely curious. We Austalians are thick skinned.)
Kay
#42
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
travelingmad,
I would never call a French Canadian a "frog," as a "frog" is a Frenchman from France (Robert Charlebois notwithstanding). Every good Anglo Quebecer knows that French Canadians are "Pepsis" or "Peppers." Would you like a Mae West with that?
Li
I would never call a French Canadian a "frog," as a "frog" is a Frenchman from France (Robert Charlebois notwithstanding). Every good Anglo Quebecer knows that French Canadians are "Pepsis" or "Peppers." Would you like a Mae West with that?
Li
#44
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 49,560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I actually first learned about the use of frog to describe a Frenchman from my Parisian friend Veronique. She wasn't the slightest bit offended by it, but rather thought it was amusing in its historical context. I've heard many an amused reference to it from French people over the years, too.
#46
Kay, In cockney, tea leaf means thief.
This list of Aussie expressions says it means the same.
http://www.recipezaar.com/bb/viewtopic.zsp?t=106206
This list of Aussie expressions says it means the same.
http://www.recipezaar.com/bb/viewtopic.zsp?t=106206
#48
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Can we tie this one up once and for all - Frog - cannot be that much of an offensive term of abuse if there is a chain of pubs in Paris of that name and is clearly using the term in context.
If the term was offensive it would be akin to having a bar in Alabama called something which used the N word.
If the term was offensive it would be akin to having a bar in Alabama called something which used the N word.
#49
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well, I must say in my years of posting I never caused a contaversy and was lucky if any of my original posts generated more than a handfull of messages. My origonal post which I asked the editors to delete as it was going to far in attitude was educational for me. And, so the beat goes on... someone, I have forgotton who asked the question of how many posts would that first one create ...now, it seems to have a life of it's own. So, what have I learned:
The use of the word "frog' impacts many in different ways. I should have thought through that aspect of diversity. But, I did get confirmation that for some, as I understood, it is offensive. So, where do we go from here...maybe that is easy, it's about tone, intent and the personal history of th speaker and listner. In the end we just need to be sensitive .... none of us are perfect, I know I am not,,,
The use of the word "frog' impacts many in different ways. I should have thought through that aspect of diversity. But, I did get confirmation that for some, as I understood, it is offensive. So, where do we go from here...maybe that is easy, it's about tone, intent and the personal history of th speaker and listner. In the end we just need to be sensitive .... none of us are perfect, I know I am not,,,
#50
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 49,560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think it's pretty obvious that where we go from here is to understand that the only people who are offended by the frog appellation are hypersensitive Americans who have very little experience with actual French people.
Not that it would be a particularly good idea to call a French person a frog in any sort of pejorative way, though there are far worse insults if you're really looking to pick a fight with a Frenchman.
Not that it would be a particularly good idea to call a French person a frog in any sort of pejorative way, though there are far worse insults if you're really looking to pick a fight with a Frenchman.
#57