Firenze vs. Florence
Feb 14th, 2009, 03:23 PM
#22
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I asked for a ticket to Florence at the train station in Milan and was told that there was no such station in Italy. However I remembered the Italian name Firenze. I should not have bothered-I was pickpocketed at the Firenze station.I was pickpocketed in Prague in a train station too and had to put up with an attempted pickpocketing episode in Malaga in Spain.Take care!
Feb 14th, 2009, 08:15 PM
#24
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,572
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"... Note too, though, that there are 2 stations in Florence: SMN (S.ta Maria Novella) and the suburban Campo Marzio. ..."
Close. It's three stations:
SMN Santa Maria Novella (named after the adjacent church which is in turn named after guess who) is the principal station,
Firenze Rifredi is near a hospital and a public university
Firenze Campo di Marte is on the other side of the historic center from SMN - quite handy for many locations close to and in the center and beyond, and well served by buses 12 (northbound) and 13 (southbound).
If you're a train buff and fluent in Italian, here's more:
http://www.firenze-online.com/traspo...ie-firenze.php
Close. It's three stations:
SMN Santa Maria Novella (named after the adjacent church which is in turn named after guess who) is the principal station,
Firenze Rifredi is near a hospital and a public university
Firenze Campo di Marte is on the other side of the historic center from SMN - quite handy for many locations close to and in the center and beyond, and well served by buses 12 (northbound) and 13 (southbound).
If you're a train buff and fluent in Italian, here's more:
http://www.firenze-online.com/traspo...ie-firenze.php
Feb 15th, 2009, 02:44 AM
#25
It does get complicated if you don't know the local names. I have always rather disliked the use of "Roma" "Napoli" Firenze" "Milano" "Venezia" used on this board by people posting in English. It seems a little pretentious .
Having said that, if giving directions then I now use these Italian names having experienced people on Pisa airport railway station looking in vain for trains to Florence and wondering why they couldn't find "Fire enz" on their maps.
Having said that, if giving directions then I now use these Italian names having experienced people on Pisa airport railway station looking in vain for trains to Florence and wondering why they couldn't find "Fire enz" on their maps.
Mar 3rd, 2009, 10:13 PM
#29
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This thread is screamingly funny... 
On the other side, we in Italy generally call the american cities with their original american name.
If sometimes it could happens to see an Italian saying "Chicago" raising a smile, this is because in our language it sounds funny (= "sh..ting here").
On the other side, we in Italy generally call the american cities with their original american name.
If sometimes it could happens to see an Italian saying "Chicago" raising a smile, this is because in our language it sounds funny (= "sh..ting here").
Mar 3rd, 2009, 11:00 PM
#30
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 17,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They're not translations. Words like Leghorn are the name people in one language use - or used at one point in time - to describe a city that's better known as something else.
There's all sorts of reasons. Pressburg was the standard name among all language groups in the area for the city Slovak nationalists rebranded Bratislava. Mons and Bergen are just the same idea (mountain) in French and Flemish. Aken/Aachen/Aix are just how Aquae Grani morphs into the three languages that are almost interchangeably used in that part of Holland/Germany/Belgium.
I'd argue the oddest example is Mumbai. A hokey pseudo-Hindi translation of the anglicised version of Bombay's original name (the Portuguese Bom Bahia: the city didn't exist till Europeans invented it). Candy (the 19th century English for Heraklion) and Christiania (ditto Oslo) were esssentially the names used locally for centuries: as with Constantinople, our grandfathers didn't see the point of changing how they described a city because of some foreigner's politics.
The fad of using locals' names is actually quite recent, and mainly limited to English speakers. Medieval Italians referred to places as unlikely as Bincestro (Winchester) Contisgualdo or Chondisgualdo (the Cotswolds, which the medieval Flemish called Colswout), Boriforte (Burford) and Norleccio (Northleach). No modern Italian refers to Wales vas anything other than Galles: every Greek lecturing us on why we should give some damnfool name to Athens calls my capital city Lodino.
There's all sorts of reasons. Pressburg was the standard name among all language groups in the area for the city Slovak nationalists rebranded Bratislava. Mons and Bergen are just the same idea (mountain) in French and Flemish. Aken/Aachen/Aix are just how Aquae Grani morphs into the three languages that are almost interchangeably used in that part of Holland/Germany/Belgium.
I'd argue the oddest example is Mumbai. A hokey pseudo-Hindi translation of the anglicised version of Bombay's original name (the Portuguese Bom Bahia: the city didn't exist till Europeans invented it). Candy (the 19th century English for Heraklion) and Christiania (ditto Oslo) were esssentially the names used locally for centuries: as with Constantinople, our grandfathers didn't see the point of changing how they described a city because of some foreigner's politics.
The fad of using locals' names is actually quite recent, and mainly limited to English speakers. Medieval Italians referred to places as unlikely as Bincestro (Winchester) Contisgualdo or Chondisgualdo (the Cotswolds, which the medieval Flemish called Colswout), Boriforte (Burford) and Norleccio (Northleach). No modern Italian refers to Wales vas anything other than Galles: every Greek lecturing us on why we should give some damnfool name to Athens calls my capital city Lodino.
Mar 4th, 2009, 03:36 AM
#35
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 8,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In everyday conversation with compatriots it may indeed be a little pretentious for an Englishman or American to always use the local name of a town, but since this is a travel forum, people need to get used to the local language - if only for their travel purposes. If the OP had met a bit more "pretentious" people, he would have known that Florence and Firenze designate the same place.
If you travel to more than one country, you may even start to hate the custom of most languages to come up with their individual version of a city's name, e.g. when you plan to take the train from Florence to Munich, or drive from Venice to Prague via Vienna.
Also odd that even the most language-challenged Anglo seems to have no problems with San Francisco or Las Vegas.
If you travel to more than one country, you may even start to hate the custom of most languages to come up with their individual version of a city's name, e.g. when you plan to take the train from Florence to Munich, or drive from Venice to Prague via Vienna.
Also odd that even the most language-challenged Anglo seems to have no problems with San Francisco or Las Vegas.
Mar 4th, 2009, 04:30 AM
#36
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi CB,
>odd that even the most language-challenged Anglo seems to have no problems with San Francisco or Las Vegas.<
But we can't agree on how to pronounce
New Orleans, LA
Cairo, IL
Nevada
Colorado
>odd that even the most language-challenged Anglo seems to have no problems with San Francisco or Las Vegas.<
But we can't agree on how to pronounce
New Orleans, LA
Cairo, IL
Nevada
Colorado
Mar 5th, 2009, 02:50 PM
#37
ira,
can't we? just how do you pronounce "cairo"? is Cairo, Il pronounced differently to Cairo, Egypt?
is this a case of you say tomato, we say tomato? [doesn't really work in print but you get the idea.]
regards, ann
can't we? just how do you pronounce "cairo"? is Cairo, Il pronounced differently to Cairo, Egypt?
is this a case of you say tomato, we say tomato? [doesn't really work in print but you get the idea.]
regards, ann
Mar 6th, 2009, 07:45 AM
#38
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't understand Cowboy's remark that 'even the most language-challenged Anglo seems to have no problems with San Francisco or Las Vegas'. Why would anyone have a problem with those names? So far as I am aware those names are written the same in every European language. I could understand if he were talking about New York, which is Nueva York in Spanish and Nuova York in Italian. The only person who seemed to have a problem with Las Vegas was Elvis Presley, who sang "Hey, Los Vegas," at least, that's how it sounded to me.
