Changing of the Guard - What does it mean?
#23
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
TravelingMom,
I suspect the C of G at Arlington is much simplier because it is a much more somber changing. Instead of the pomp of the C of G at Buckingham the Ceremony at Arlington is to remember the fallen unknown soldiers at the cemetary. It would be very out of character to have bands playing in Arlington.
Karl
I suspect the C of G at Arlington is much simplier because it is a much more somber changing. Instead of the pomp of the C of G at Buckingham the Ceremony at Arlington is to remember the fallen unknown soldiers at the cemetary. It would be very out of character to have bands playing in Arlington.
Karl
#27
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ira,
I do agree with you but I think you would have a hard time convincing the Army Bank to perform the Marine Song. Being a past Army draftee who was stationed at Fort Myer, Virginia which houses the Army Honor Guard who performs as the Guardsman at the Changining of the Guard at the Tomb of the Unkown Soldier at Arlington Cemetery, I don't believe that "When The Caissons Go Rolling Along" would be appropriate at Arlington National Cememtary.
I do agree with you but I think you would have a hard time convincing the Army Bank to perform the Marine Song. Being a past Army draftee who was stationed at Fort Myer, Virginia which houses the Army Honor Guard who performs as the Guardsman at the Changining of the Guard at the Tomb of the Unkown Soldier at Arlington Cemetery, I don't believe that "When The Caissons Go Rolling Along" would be appropriate at Arlington National Cememtary.
#29
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nini: What you saw was likely an Irish Wolfhound, which is the official mascot of the Irish Guards ("the Micks", one of five regiments of foot guards which normally perform this ceremony.
#30
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,923
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm a little surprised at flanner. I'd have thought it generally understood since Bagehot that royal ceremonial can be explained as a development in inverse proportion to actual royal power.
If in doubt, the details of today's grandiose ceremonials can usually be blamed on George IV (1820-1830), though the peculiar habits of the Army have some bearing (if it moves, salute it - if it doesn't, polish it with Brasso): they like making life difficult for themselves.
If in doubt, the details of today's grandiose ceremonials can usually be blamed on George IV (1820-1830), though the peculiar habits of the Army have some bearing (if it moves, salute it - if it doesn't, polish it with Brasso): they like making life difficult for themselves.
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oh2doula
Europe
6
Dec 19th, 2012 11:59 AM
cheriegal
Europe
9
Jun 11th, 2003 02:58 PM