Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Europe
Reload this Page >

Benelux or Scandinavia

Search

Benelux or Scandinavia

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 12th, 2003 | 03:35 AM
  #1  
Carol
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Benelux or Scandinavia

Greetings:<BR>I need help &amp; would really value your opinion on this.<BR>I have not seen anything on the message boards re: traveling to Benelux vs. Scandinavia. I have 2 weeks to travel, and don't want to go to both - what would you choose &amp; what places/cities are your favorites (don't mix &amp; match between Benelux &amp; Scandinavia!)<BR>Thanks<BR>
 
Old Jan 12th, 2003 | 04:13 AM
  #2  
Sjoerd
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Very general answer: if you are a nature person, and like outdoor activities, go to Scandinavia. (especially Norway)<BR>If you like old cities, nightlife, museums, go to Benelux.<BR>If money is important, Benelux is cheaper than (most of) Scandinavia. <BR>In Scandinavia, I like most of Norway for nature (one of the most beautiful countries in the world), in Benelux, some nice cities to visit are Amsterdam, Delft, Maastricht, Brugge, Antwerpen and Gent.
 
Old Jan 12th, 2003 | 04:28 AM
  #3  
David
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
You haven't seen much about Benelux or Scandinavia on this board because it really isn't the “Europe” forum. It's the “Italy, France &amp; UK” forum. <BR><BR>I've been through both areas in the last couple of years. Benelux in 2001 and Scandinavia this June. I really liked them both but there are a couple of things I would use to help me make this decision.<BR><BR>Weather: I was in Scandinavia in June and it was wonderfully cool compared to the 80 degrees unseasonably warm weather that Paris was having at the same time. Air-conditioning isn't as prevalent in Europe and the heat makes me cranky.<BR><BR>Cost: If your wallet is exploding with money Scandinavia is the place for you. Finland was comparable to Benelux in cost, but Stockholm was expensive and Oslo was insane. I had to struggle to keep my average hotel cost at 70USD a night. In Oslo and Stockholm I stayed in rooms with the bathroom at the end of the hall. In Benelux I kept my hotel costs the same but had my own bathroom every night.<BR><BR>In the last few years I have really made an effort to get outside of the big cities and have yet to be disappointed. Not only are there fewer tourists, but the costs for food and lodging are much less. The smaller towns I saw in Scandinavia were Orebro in Stockholm and Turku in Finland. In Belgium I stayed in Liege and in Holland I stayed at Katwijk an Zee. Staying two nights in each of these towns really helped my travel budget. <BR><BR>Don't miss Luxembourg City if you choose Benelux. It's beautiful.
 
Old Jan 12th, 2003 | 08:54 AM
  #4  
Ben Haines
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear Ms Silverman,<BR><BR>As Sjoerd says, Scandinavia is stronger in nature, lakes, mountains and scenery, the Low Countries in old cities. But there are plenty of old cities in Scandinavia, so I want to add that Scandinavia has quieter city centres, with fewer rowdies, and has better-kept city centres, with more fresh paint and less litter. Of course there are seaside cities and towns in the Low Countries, but places turned towards the sea are commoner in Scandinavia. The Low Countries are at the heart of the history of west European economics and culture: the wool trade, the music of the courts of Burgundy, Memling, Erasmus, the Reformation and Counter-Reformation, the seventeenth century painters, colonialism, the Enlightenment, land reclamation from the sea, Hitler's war, liberalism, Europeanism. After the Vikings, Scandinavia took part in all these movements, but usually not as central players. Linnaeus is a bit of an exception, and even his collection is now in London.<BR><BR>In practical terms, Scandinavians and Dutch speak English fluently and well, and Belgians quite well<BR><BR>Sorry for all these generalisations.<BR><BR>Ben Haines, London<BR>
 
Old Jan 12th, 2003 | 09:25 AM
  #5  
Shannon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I haven't been to Benelux other than Amsterdam, which was the start and end to our Scandinavian adventure last summer.<BR><BR>My husband's favorite city was Stockholm, primarily because there is so much to do and the people are so darned good looking.<BR><BR>My favorite city was Trondheim in Norway. In the summer, very warm and the sun almost never goes down. So beautiful, accessible, and affordable.<BR><BR>We didn't find the costs to be that exhorbitant, except for the cost of alcohol in Norway.<BR><BR>One more thing, one of the highlights of our trip was the overnight boat ride from Stockholm to Helsinki and back.
 
Old Jan 12th, 2003 | 10:07 AM
  #6  
Ron
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Carol,<BR><BR>Personally, I liked my experiences in Scandinavia better than Benelux. I loved the people of Denmark, Sweden is beautiful, and Norway is well Norway. I would recommend a cruise somewhere - Copenhagen to Oslo, Stockholm to Helsinki, etc. The Swedish Archipelago is magical in the summer. Also, Estonia is close to Helsinki, which in my mind is a big bonus. People speak English better than we do, and there is some real hidden gems.<BR><BR>You can't really go wrong in Benelux either. But your two weeks would be more homogenous. It wouldn't be a stretch to go to Copenhagen from Amsterdam for a couple of days for a taste of Scandinavia. (Sorry about the mix and match) Best wishes.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
daria26
Europe
12
Sep 28th, 2015 07:09 PM
mbk4380
Europe
18
Jun 6th, 2011 02:00 PM
Sten
Europe
11
Mar 12th, 2007 01:33 PM
JoeTro
Europe
6
Jan 25th, 2005 06:01 AM
db9775
Europe
4
Feb 24th, 2004 02:25 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -