Beef dishes (French)
#21
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't order steak in Paris as a rule, but have had good, thinly sliced steak served as tagliata at Lei in the 7th arrond.
Outside Paris, one of the best cuts of steak I've ever eaten was a "poire" of beef at d'Antan Sancerrois in Bourges. Delicious.
As for Le Temps Perdu, I only ate there once and was disappointed with the food, service and atmosphere. But perhaps it was an off night.
Outside Paris, one of the best cuts of steak I've ever eaten was a "poire" of beef at d'Antan Sancerrois in Bourges. Delicious.
As for Le Temps Perdu, I only ate there once and was disappointed with the food, service and atmosphere. But perhaps it was an off night.
#22
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi, BTilke, I imagine your tastes and experience are more sophisticated than mine. For now, I'm looking at inexpensive bistros that don't look intimidating...'baby steps'.
Appreciate all the feedback - everyone loves to talk about food, don't they!
Appreciate all the feedback - everyone loves to talk about food, don't they!
#25
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For what it's worth, <i>L'Entrecôte</i> is an extremely common name for a restaurant that serves a lot of beef; it's not a specific place. You can find restaurants by this name in just about any town. There are perhaps a dozen or so restaurants with names incorporating the term in Paris alone.
#26
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Author: AnthonyGA
Date: 04/15/2006, 03:17 am
For what it's worth, L'Entrecôte is an extremely common name for a restaurant that serves a lot of beef; it's not a specific place. You can find restaurants by this name in just about any town. There are perhaps a dozen or so restaurants with names incorporating the term in Paris alone.
Worth reading about it here : http://fodors.com/forums/pgMessages....=l%27entrecote
Peter
Date: 04/15/2006, 03:17 am
For what it's worth, L'Entrecôte is an extremely common name for a restaurant that serves a lot of beef; it's not a specific place. You can find restaurants by this name in just about any town. There are perhaps a dozen or so restaurants with names incorporating the term in Paris alone.
Worth reading about it here : http://fodors.com/forums/pgMessages....=l%27entrecote
Peter
#27
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 23,523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, we have a place called L'Entrecote right here midtown Manhattan, or at least we did last time I looked. I think you need to keep in mind that the French dissect a cow for meat a bit different than we do in the US so not every cut will have a corresponding English translation. Beef cheeks will certainly be tender!
#28
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Travelnut - I would agree with StCirq(the person not the place) and Huitre (the person not the oyster) that you might want to look for Boeuf Bourgignon on the menu. Calling it "beef stew" would be an insult as it is uually done superbly in most bistros and restaurants. It is beef, mushrooms, red wine and a few variations.
I think most will agree that the tendency towards toughness of French beef can be attributed to pasture grazing as opposed to grain feeding, lack of injected hormones, and short hang time. Arguably, the beef will be healthier for you but less tender. Interesting that a country that ages wine and cheese doesn't age beef (much). I will resist the urge to describe what aging beef really is.
I think most will agree that the tendency towards toughness of French beef can be attributed to pasture grazing as opposed to grain feeding, lack of injected hormones, and short hang time. Arguably, the beef will be healthier for you but less tender. Interesting that a country that ages wine and cheese doesn't age beef (much). I will resist the urge to describe what aging beef really is.
#29
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One other important point. French beef, while often not as tender as North American, is meant to be eaten rare (saignant), or very rare (bleu). You may get away with medium rare (a point) but even that starts getting tougher. So if you dont like rare steaks, even more reason to look for other ways to get your beef.
#30
Entrecôte or even basses-côtes is my favorite cut, always extremely tender and eaten as rare as possible. The other cuts can be chewier than one would like, as the hormones and other chemicals used in North American beef are forbidden in Europe.
#31
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 19,000
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
kerouac, the next time you're in Chicago, Kansas City, or Omaha, I will treat you to beef that is range-fed, chemical- and hormone-free, and doesn't require a steak knife to eat it.
The best-kept secret of the stockyard cities where the meat is produced is that the really <i>great</i> beef never leaves town.
The best-kept secret of the stockyard cities where the meat is produced is that the really <i>great</i> beef never leaves town.
#33
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There is little problem finding excellent grass-fed beef (no hormone treatments, etc.) in the U.S. Our friends order their beef from this site:
http://www.americangrassfedbeef.com/...beef-steak.asp
Cooked correctly, it's outstanding. When we visit them, we love to tuck into some of those meidum-rare grass-fed tenderloin filets!
http://www.americangrassfedbeef.com/...beef-steak.asp
Cooked correctly, it's outstanding. When we visit them, we love to tuck into some of those meidum-rare grass-fed tenderloin filets!
#34
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BTilke - I think the point is that there is a problem finding beef at restaurants in the states that is grass fed, hormone free, chemical free. As Robespierre says it is somewhat of a secret. Hormone beef from Canada and the US has been banned in France since 1989. Although these tw countries won an unfair trade case involving France's refusal to import hormoned beef 1999, they decided to pay a penalty o $100 million a year rather than give in.
Some 27 years later we are just waking up to the potential health problems of eating this sort of thing.
Some 27 years later we are just waking up to the potential health problems of eating this sort of thing.
#36
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 19,000
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The best beef I have ever tasted was cooked in the cities where it was dressed. On a scale of zero to Top of the Crown in Kansas City, the range-fed, hormone-free we get at Trader Joe's in Scottsdale is about a seven, to be generous.
#37
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13,323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Are all European hamburgers made from grass-fed, hormone-free, chemical free, stress-free, insect-free, odor-free cattle who drink mineral water and were raised in pristine mountain pastures where the sound of music was alive?
#38
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Degas - I am disappointed in you. Your sarcasm makes it sound like you wouldn't want hormones in the beef you eat. This is totally opposed to the position of the FDA ...
<<The six hormones are approved and can be used safely for growth promotion. The use of hormones provides several benefits in beef production. A hormone-treated animal gains weight more rapidly, producing a more flavorful and tender product. By reaching market weight sooner, there is a reduction in the cost of beef production. Thus, consumers are provided with a higher quality of meat at lower prices.>>
So you can see that according to the FDA the EU is wrong in wanting hormone-free, tougher, lower quality beef.
<<The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been thoroughly researching the effects of growth hormones since the 1950s. FDA and other scientific experts have found that there is essentially no difference between beef from animals raised using hormones and those raised without their use. On all occasions of testing, the six hormones have always been found to pose no measurable or adverse health effects.>>
... and you do trust our government, don't you?
<<The six hormones are approved and can be used safely for growth promotion. The use of hormones provides several benefits in beef production. A hormone-treated animal gains weight more rapidly, producing a more flavorful and tender product. By reaching market weight sooner, there is a reduction in the cost of beef production. Thus, consumers are provided with a higher quality of meat at lower prices.>>
So you can see that according to the FDA the EU is wrong in wanting hormone-free, tougher, lower quality beef.
<<The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been thoroughly researching the effects of growth hormones since the 1950s. FDA and other scientific experts have found that there is essentially no difference between beef from animals raised using hormones and those raised without their use. On all occasions of testing, the six hormones have always been found to pose no measurable or adverse health effects.>>
... and you do trust our government, don't you?
#40
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It is a matter of trusting the WTO which after lengthy hearings on the matter, on the basis of evidence adduced on the record, concluded in 1997 that the beef ban was NOT based on scientific evidence.