Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Asia
Reload this Page >

Nikko or Kamakura?

Search

Nikko or Kamakura?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 4th, 2007 | 10:20 AM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Nikko or Kamakura?

We are planning 3 days in Tokyo and for one day would like to go to Nikko or Kamakura. We are going to Kyoto after Tokyo.
Frommers suggests to choose Nikko if visiting Kyoto. Any suggestions are really apreciated.
Also, any suggestions how to plan 2-2.5 days in Tokyo? Any recommendations for half day sightseeing tours?
Irina11 is offline  
Old Apr 4th, 2007 | 10:51 AM
  #2  
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,282
Likes: 0
Kamarkura
glorialf is offline  
Old Apr 4th, 2007 | 11:43 AM
  #3  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
i would agree with frommers on Nikko, but note we did NOT go to Kamakura. However, we chose Nikko because it sounded very different from the more subdued and subtle style of the temples typical in japan, especially in Kyoto and we liked seeing that contrast. Nikko is by far very ornate - very Chinese influenced style, but in a lovely wooded/park setting.

As to Tokyo, depending on when u r there, the highlight for us was visiting a Sumo stable in the morning to see a practice VERY up close (Eyewitness guided has some write up on how to do that when tournaments are not scheduled).
lilipad is offline  
Old Apr 4th, 2007 | 11:45 AM
  #4  
kja
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 25,720
Likes: 0
I enjoyed visiting both Nikko and Kamakura. Nikko's temples and shrines are much grander and more ornate than those of Kamakura, and are somewhat unusual for Japan; Kamakura's temples are older and more humble, and more typical of Japan. Kamakura is in a pretty setting by the bay; Nikko is near Lake Chuzenji and the impressive Kegon waterfall. Hope that helps!
kja is offline  
Old Apr 4th, 2007 | 04:09 PM
  #5  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,537
Likes: 0
Both Nikko and Kamakura have interesting sights. Kamakura is a closer to Tokyo and is easier to get to via the metro system. With just 3 days, this travel time might make a difference.
curiousgeo is offline  
Old Apr 5th, 2007 | 02:17 AM
  #6  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,347
Likes: 8
We just spent two nights in Kamakura and it was wonderful. We went to Nikko last time in Japan so we decided on Kamakura for this time. If I had to choose one, I'd go with Kamakura.
laurieco is offline  
Old Apr 6th, 2007 | 10:06 AM
  #7  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Many thanks to everybody for advices. Is it possible to visit Kamakura on our way from Hakone to Kyoto? We are planning to go to Hakone from Tokyo and overnight there.
Irina11 is offline  
Old Apr 11th, 2007 | 05:54 AM
  #8  
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,836
Likes: 0
Hakone-Kamakura-Kyoto would be backtracking, as Kamakura is closer to Tokyo. You can do the reverse, ie Tokyo-Kamakura-Hakone-Kyoto, though I doubt you would enough time to do this. Tokyo-Kamakura is about 1hr train ride, but Kamakura is not served by the bullet train.
W9London is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
newtome
Asia
5
Sep 9th, 2019 11:49 PM
isemida
Asia
12
Aug 1st, 2017 09:18 PM
jtgarland
Asia
6
Feb 19th, 2016 02:56 AM
zenya
Asia
4
Jun 10th, 2009 08:05 AM
debbfrog
Asia
9
May 7th, 2005 01:07 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -