Go Back  Fodor's Travel Talk Forums > Destinations > Asia
Reload this Page >

Chitwan, or not?

Search

Chitwan, or not?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 13th, 2010, 12:03 PM
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 27,615
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Chitwan, or not?

My RTW planning has now reached Nepal (although I'm still working on hotels for Korea and Taiwan), and the next decision is whether to include Chitwan. I'm really going to Nepal for mountains and temples, I'm not that into animals (an African safari is good ways down my list) and it's a bit out of the way for the itinerary I'm considering. I've also read that the number of animals is down thanks to flooding in 2002 and poaching during the insurgency, and that the chances of seeing leopards, never mind a tiger, are close to zero..

While I did enjoy the bird park at Bharatpur a lot more than I expected, the birds need to be reasonably big for me to spot them. I've already ridden an elephant, so that's not necessarily a draw, either. Anyone been to Chitwan lately who thought it was really worthwhile? How about in comparison to national parks in south India?
thursdaysd is offline  
Old Jul 13th, 2010, 12:17 PM
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 33,288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thursdays, years ago I did did some resaerch on going to Chitwan and decided that if I wanted to visit a park in Nepal with the hope of seeing some animals, Bardia was a better bet. I ended up not doing either, but you might take a look at Bardia. At the time, it was much less visited and much less degraded than Chitwan.
Kathie is offline  
Old Jul 13th, 2010, 12:48 PM
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 27,615
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thanks for the suggestion, Kathie. I had looked at Bardia, but it seemed like a really long haul to get there, and then from there to anywhere else. Maybe I'll take another look.
thursdaysd is offline  
Old Jul 13th, 2010, 06:02 PM
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Thursdays - Chitwan is not lacking in wildlife, big and small, if you go to the western end of the park. Flooding and poaching were minor matters in the greater scheme of things. Actually Katie is also a little out of date and Bardia has been harder hit by poaching in recent years. I'd say there is no point going somewhere that does not interest you. However, Chitwan and Bardia are great parks representing the finest examples of the Terai Grassland habitat that used to cover much of the Gangetic Plains of the northern Indian sub-continent. If you do go, choose Tiger Tops Jungle Lodge in Chitwan or Karnali Jungle Lodge in Bardia - best naturalists and accomodation.
MarcusCotton is offline  
Old Jul 13th, 2010, 06:08 PM
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 33,288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm sorry to hear that Bardia has been hard hit by poaching. Thanks for updating my old info, Marcus.
Kathie is offline  
Old Jul 13th, 2010, 06:56 PM
  #6  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, Marcus is a bit out of date as well. Tiger Tops Jungle Lodge in Chitwan has been closed for at least six months.
dogster is offline  
Old Jul 13th, 2010, 07:28 PM
  #7  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 833
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have been to various countries in Africa and on safaris there. Chitwan didn't appeal at all when I was planning my trip to Nepal. I will say that an African safari burns $$$ fast, I could be wrong but I doubt Chitan could be anywhere near as expensive as an African safari. So if you are in the least bit interested visit Chitwan based solely on the fact that this should cost much much less than a similar experience in parts of Africa.
justshootme is offline  
Old Jul 13th, 2010, 08:18 PM
  #8  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 27,615
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well, the TT Jungle Lodge was way out of my price range to start with, based on the figures in the latest LP.

justshootme - but I'd stand a much better chance of seeing (for example) lions in Africa than tigers in Nepal, right? I guess the fact that I'm even asking the question means I should do something else with the time, but I thought someone might show up with a paean to Chitwan and convince me otherwise.
thursdaysd is offline  
Old Jul 13th, 2010, 08:39 PM
  #9  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 833
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not sure what the chances of seeing lions are in Chitwan. In Africa if you see the big five consider yourself extrememtly lucky. IMO, your chances increase in private game reserves, prices for private reserves are considerably more than public game reserves in African countries.

Sorry, I haven't been to Chitwan and can't compare Chitwan to an African safari. Are parts of Africa part of this rtw trip too? If so, and even if not, just take a quick look at prices/products for Chitwan compared to parts of Africa.
justshootme is offline  
Old Jul 14th, 2010, 05:10 AM
  #10  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 27,615
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
justshootme - no lions in Chitwan, for sure! The big draw there is/was Bengal tigers. Possibility of Asiatic lions in Gir National Park near Ahmedabad in India if I decide to go there. No African safari on this trip, although maybe Tunisia near the end.
thursdaysd is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Original Poster
Forum
Replies
Last Post
windycitytraveler
South America
4
Nov 18th, 2014 05:58 AM
Andrea_loves_travel
Mexico & Central America
4
Jan 3rd, 2011 04:44 PM
Kits55
Africa & the Middle East
15
Dec 7th, 2010 07:00 AM
glover
Asia
4
Jul 8th, 2010 07:24 AM
MJ
Canada
5
Aug 8th, 2002 01:59 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -