Free wine in coach?
#1
Original Poster
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,293
Likes: 0
Free wine in coach?
I was told that starting on January 6, 2005, all US Airlines would begin charging $4 or $5 for a glass of wine on International flights in coach. For that reason alone, I am willing to pay a little extra to fly on a foreign airline like BA, Virgin, etc., where a glass of wine is free with dinner. Has anyone had free wine on any US airline since January 6, 2005?
#3


Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 26,151
Likes: 0
A guy in my office flew Continental to Amsterdam a couple of years ago and came back mad as heck for having to pay $5 for a beer. He vowed never to fly Continental again for that reason. The next year he was planning another trip to Europe and Continental was about $150 cheaper than any of it's competitors. He got over the "free drink" issue fast, and flew Continental. This should not be a determining factor in the airline you choose.
#5
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 23,073
Likes: 0
If you fly Continental a lot and like to have some alcoholic drinks enroute, you can get "Continental Currency" coupons at the e-kiosks. Three coupons are $13 ($2 off), six coupons $25 ($5 off).
I usually don't drink on the plane, but got a couple of such coupons from Elite relatives. Two nice things about using them - 1) make people around you jealous; 2) the FAs will know that you're a Continental regular, and will treat you a little better in general.
I usually don't drink on the plane, but got a couple of such coupons from Elite relatives. Two nice things about using them - 1) make people around you jealous; 2) the FAs will know that you're a Continental regular, and will treat you a little better in general.
Trending Topics
#10
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
Last time I flew with BA the wine was free - but
(i) it was foul tasting and really undrinkable rubbish (and i'm not a wine snob - I rarely pay more than £6-£7 for a bottle of wine)
(ii) the seat pitch was only 31"
(iii) the cabin was roasting hot
(iv) the water froze on the plane (long haul flight without any water to drink - nice)
(v) BA in the past have made it quite clear that they don't see the Economy traveller as where they want to focus their attention - and don't you realise it when 3/4 of the passengers are crammed into the back 1/3 of the jumbo.
Virgin, may be a completely different story, but I would never pay a supplement to fly with British Airways for any reason
(i) it was foul tasting and really undrinkable rubbish (and i'm not a wine snob - I rarely pay more than £6-£7 for a bottle of wine)
(ii) the seat pitch was only 31"
(iii) the cabin was roasting hot
(iv) the water froze on the plane (long haul flight without any water to drink - nice)
(v) BA in the past have made it quite clear that they don't see the Economy traveller as where they want to focus their attention - and don't you realise it when 3/4 of the passengers are crammed into the back 1/3 of the jumbo.
Virgin, may be a completely different story, but I would never pay a supplement to fly with British Airways for any reason
#12
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Walter, I am quite confident- nay- 100% certain, that BA are not the only airline to have had the occasional glitch with air con and so forth. To denegrate an airline on this basis is rather silly. Nice.
BA is not alone either in seeing that business pax are the most important and profitable customers to their business. It seems that US airlines have forgotten this in their fare struggles (defeats?) against the Southwests and Jet Blues of this world. The full service airlines who realise this fact about business travellers are the only airlines who remain profitable and in business. Members of this select group would include the aforementioned BA, plus other usual suspects such as VS, SQ, AF, EK etc etc. Obviously, no American carriers will be in this select group as they are too busy giving away too many miles and upgrades to passengers and neglect the fact that they need to stay in business.
BA is not alone either in seeing that business pax are the most important and profitable customers to their business. It seems that US airlines have forgotten this in their fare struggles (defeats?) against the Southwests and Jet Blues of this world. The full service airlines who realise this fact about business travellers are the only airlines who remain profitable and in business. Members of this select group would include the aforementioned BA, plus other usual suspects such as VS, SQ, AF, EK etc etc. Obviously, no American carriers will be in this select group as they are too busy giving away too many miles and upgrades to passengers and neglect the fact that they need to stay in business.
#13
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
Pardon me Cosmic Toadstool for being silly..
The points I highlighted in my post were a few of a catalogue of horrors on that flight. I have been regularly flying long haul for over 20 years and this was without doubt the worst flight by any airline I have experienced. If I wish to denegrate an airline based on that, I will.
As for an airlines relationship with its business class passengers, obviously I know that this is where the profit is, but as far as I am aware I can only think of one airline that has in recent years gone public saying we don't really want to concentrate on those looking for cheap fares in future.
The points I highlighted in my post were a few of a catalogue of horrors on that flight. I have been regularly flying long haul for over 20 years and this was without doubt the worst flight by any airline I have experienced. If I wish to denegrate an airline based on that, I will.
As for an airlines relationship with its business class passengers, obviously I know that this is where the profit is, but as far as I am aware I can only think of one airline that has in recent years gone public saying we don't really want to concentrate on those looking for cheap fares in future.




