Search

Zimbabwe election

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 2nd, 2008 | 03:47 AM
  #21  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Kavey - I hear what you are saying. But would you agree with the following statement?

"99% of people who post on the Africa board really have no idea where they are going. They are just going to see "the animals". Don't care, don't know, anything about the countries they are visiting, except they want to see a lion."

Yes, No??

afterall is offline  
Old Apr 2nd, 2008 | 05:01 AM
  #22  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
Afterall, you may be right, you may be wrong, about those posting here. As Kavey so rightly points out, the little piece of ourselves that we show here is only a little piece.

I've studied African politics a little bit (about 50-60 graduate credit hours worth), and lived in SA, and I have a few modest and partial answers about why African governments are the way they are, and why the "international community" responds to Africa the way it does. But I don't especially want to discus them in a context that assumes that oil is the only factor in US foreign policy, for example.

Many books have been written about the nature of African politics, by people who have done serious study of the topic. Anyone who really wants to understand the present Zim situation can find more useful answers by looking there, rather than here.
Celia is offline  
Old Apr 2nd, 2008 | 05:41 AM
  #23  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,916
Likes: 0
<<99% of people who post on the Africa board really have no idea where they are going. They are just going to see "the animals". Don't care, don't know, anything about the countries they are visiting, except they want to see a lion.>>

Frankly, I (and you) have absolutely no basis to make that estimation, and your self-righteousness, that you are the only person concerned with Zimbabwe, is off-putting. This is, afterall, first and foremost, a travel forum -- there must be other forums dedicated to a discussion of the Zimbabwe, and other, political situations. But, afterall, banter on a forum is free -- maybe on those other forums, the forums dedicated to political discourse, you can offer practical advice, instead of cheap remarks.
thit_cho is offline  
Old Apr 2nd, 2008 | 09:01 AM
  #24  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,392
Likes: 0
No I absolutely would not agree with that statement. As Thit_Cho says and as I was trying to indicate in my previous post, it's impossible to judge knowledge on non-travel issues since this is essentially a board about TRAVEL and not politics (or other issues) within Africa and so most posters, whether they know very little or lots and lots on those various non-travel topics, won't be posting about them here.
Kavey is offline  
Old Apr 2nd, 2008 | 09:40 AM
  #25  
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
Thank you, Celia, Kavey and thit_cho, for your posts.

For my two cents -- No, I don't think that "99%" statement is true, and frankly I find it insulting. I don't care about or know anything about African countries just because I don't choose to talk politics on a travel forum? That's absurd.
MyDogKyle is offline  
Old Apr 2nd, 2008 | 10:07 AM
  #26  
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 8,675
Likes: 0
While this isn't a political forum, when you travel anywhere, politics manages to sneek in.

Only weeks ago there was thread-upon-thread about the political upheaval in Kenya and how it did or would impact current or future travel to this country or anywhere in Africa.

Every few months there's a thread asking about the Travel Warnings to any number of countries.

We've discussed the bombings in Egypt and the safety of travel to this country. Also, ealth and safety for travel anywhere on this continent.

So why not Zimbabwe which has been under control of a maniac for years, taking a once thriving and beautiful destination to the brink (if not already there); a place that many ask "should we" or "not travel here?"

I would agree that some people travel to Africa, whether for culture on only animals, and have very little knowledge of their destination, nor care to know. But that can be said about many different places around the world.

Plenty of threads about "traveler" or "tourist" - personalities of visitors, attitudes, quirks, behavior, attire, food, and on and on. So, again why not politics about a continent many of us feel very close to.

It's doubtful we'll have the answers or could snap our fingers and make it all better, but nothing wrong with opinions and thoughts as long as it doesn't get nasty and become a hissy match!
sandi is offline  
Old Apr 2nd, 2008 | 10:37 AM
  #27  
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
You're absolutely right, Sandi -- no reason not to discuss politics on a travel forum, because you definitely can't separate the two.

The part of this thread that annoyed me was the assumption that if everyone doesn't jump into the discussion on a particular thread, it means either they don't know anything, or they don't care.
MyDogKyle is offline  
Old Apr 2nd, 2008 | 10:40 AM
  #28  
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
Agreed. I've seen political topics discussed here in limited scope before. I enjoy reading political opinions (when presented respectfully), and it appears that other Fodors forums may discuss politics more than this one.

In this thread, I thought I would see if afterall had anything particularly insightful to say, regardless of her misguided view of the people of this forum. At the very least, I thought I might be able to learn something from her.

However, it appears that all she wants to do is continue to mischaracterize us rather than "get our views."

So, I apologize for feeding this troll.
Gritty is offline  
Old Apr 2nd, 2008 | 12:08 PM
  #29  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,392
Likes: 0
It's not that it's not appropriate to discuss politics here, should people wish to, especially when it relates to decisions concerning travel to that destination.

Personally I am happy enough to see the topic discussed as I've certainly been following the news closely.

It's more the erroneous conclusion that was jumped to; that those who hadn't posted about Zimbabwean politics (or the politics of any other country, for that matter) had no knowledge, no interest or simply didn't care.

Kavey is offline  
Old Apr 2nd, 2008 | 01:57 PM
  #30  
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Kavey, sandi, and thit_cho. I very much agree with your posts.

I think if anyone would bother to search this forum, you'll find lots of posts where well meaning, thoughtful, and reasonable travelers are struggling with the question of whether a visit to Zimbabwe would help or hurt the people.

I don't see any posts of the "to heck with the locals, point me at the lions" variety.
Favor is offline  
Old Apr 2nd, 2008 | 03:00 PM
  #31  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,552
Likes: 0
Afterall,
You are certainly not the only person on this board who has lived in, or cares about Zimbabwe. I did my PhD research in Zim and have spent several stretches of up to a year there over the last two decades. I have lots of opinions on the international community/elections/human rights abuses/economic meltdown etc. but this is a travel board.

If you had asked this question in a less pompous, hostile manner perhaps you could have generated a wealth of information and opinion but that doesn't appear to be what what you were aiming for.

welltraveledbrit is offline  
Old Apr 4th, 2008 | 12:21 PM
  #32  
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
When Mugabe says he'll allow a runoff election, he really means the opposition should run off before they're arrested or killed.
Favor is offline  
Old Apr 6th, 2008 | 01:49 AM
  #33  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
welltravelled et al,

You are right. My original post, and follow ups could have been more temperate, but if they had been, I don't think we'd be having this discussion.

Grateful to those of you who do think politics can't be divorced from travel.

Re oil - just a pot stirrer. Agree that USA has no OVERT history of interest in the African continent. Not generally recognised as a "sphere of influence". BUT let's not kid ourselves that there weren't battles for hearts and minds going on between the US and the USSR during those years.

Of course there were. And now, on a more general front, the battle is likely to be between China and non-China.

Re millions of dollars spend on AIDS and malaria. Whoever said that has obviously overlooked the fact that the Bush Govt's favoured response to AIDS is to abstain from sex. I do salute Bill Gates' contributions to malaria research.

It's looking very nasty. And sure as sure can be, the majority of the Zimbabean nation want to get rid of Mugabe. So what happens next?

I honestly don't know who will step up to prevent a disaster. But someone must.

afterall is offline  
Old Apr 6th, 2008 | 05:22 AM
  #34  
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,669
Likes: 0
to be something of a devil's advocate - it does seem that travel to Africa is more animal viewing based so to speak, although I feel that that is due to how the trips are structured. I am mentally composing an email to our TA to ask if we can spend a little time in some villages on our way from point A to point B on our safari, to get a feel, however small, for the human side of Botswana. A flying safari does not give one a chance to see the rest of the country, besides the parks and concessions. Luckily ours is part flying, part driving.

Mugabe is a destabilizing influence in southern Africa, agreed, but how much power does SA have? From what I read, and the arguments that I've seen on this board, there are enough problems internally in SA that they might not be able to influence anyone else.

Momliz is offline  
Old Apr 6th, 2008 | 07:19 AM
  #35  
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Afterall -

How about a perspective from someone who is preparing to take his family on their first ever safari in August?? While game viewing is certainly a priority for our trip, we also sat down (wife and 2 teenagers)and discussed what else we wanted to learn/see from our trip. A the top of the list was.."what can we learn about the culture, and is there anything, no matter how small we can do to help the people??"

For this reason, we decided on a 4 night stay on the Zim side of Vic Falls. While this was in no way a decision driven by "politics", it was a decision made to help the people of Zim in some tiny way (whether or not we're helping I do understand is a point of great debate). Given the current political climate, we may or may not ultimately be able to visit Zim in August, however, at least in our family, there is a definate desire to take home more than just "photos of a lion".

Since election day, our family has learned more about the plight of the Zim people than I would have ever imagined. My kids are beginning to develop a compassion for a struggling people/nation.

In my opinion, that's a far more important life lesson than simply marking animal sightings in a safari journal.

jgoebel is offline  
Old Apr 6th, 2008 | 07:54 AM
  #36  
pippa13
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
first of all: i could not and would not argue on the percentage of tourists to africa who are simply not interested in anything else except animals. i believe this is the question in view to all destinations not simply africa.

regarding mugabe's destabilisation of southern africa:

as long as NAM, BOT and foremost mbeki from RZA supports the ZIM government simply based on former comradeship there won't be space for a solution. especially the people of ZIM feel betrayed by these southern african governments for not helping.

in view to RZA:
i don't think south africa has reached its peak of destabilisation itself! as far as i can see - i am in south africa on a more regular basis and don't simply stay in fancy lodges but also speak to "joe average" - the black majority's disappointment is growing and if ZUMA is going to become the next president things are going to change to the worse, not only for the whites but also for the black underpriviliged.
in case they convict zuma of several charges (16 in the pipeline from illegal wappen trade and rape to money laundring) the country might face severe trouble.
just one figur:
in 1996 the number of people living below the povertyline were 1.5 million. in 2006 this figure rose up to 4.5 million!
 
Old Apr 6th, 2008 | 09:04 AM
  #37  
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,215
Likes: 0
I would have posted a relevant reply. But you have to drag the US and UK into it. And your snide remark about "animal watchers" put me off. Maybe you should take this question to the "Lounge" where posters will bash anything without any constructive suggestions and unrelated to facts.

regards - tom
cary999 is offline  
Old Apr 9th, 2008 | 05:28 AM
  #38  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Tom - shame you don't feel able to comment. But with respect, the UK and and US have to be dragged into it. That's really the whole point. Zimbabwe is being allowed to operate as if in a vacuum - hands off - WHY?

Momliz and jgoebels - appreciate your contributions.

And JG, I agree, totally, and more than I can say, with your comment:

"In my opinion, that's a far more important life lesson than simply marking animal sightings in a safari journal".

That, I suppose, is what I'm getting at. 90% or more of posts on this board are about, for instance; where to see a wild dog; sightings of lions, and elephants, and, etc, etc. ...; and which is the best "camp" to stay at?

Sort of demonstrates the interest people have in the countries of the continent. Which is basically nill, as long as they get those photos.

afterall is offline  
Old Apr 9th, 2008 | 05:31 AM
  #39  
Original Poster
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
And this is exactly the sort of thing I mean:

http://www.fodors.com/forums/threads...p;tid=35121197

afterall is offline  
Old Apr 9th, 2008 | 06:47 AM
  #40  
sniktawk
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
After All

I have previously not posted to this thread as I do not believe that political discussion belongs on a TRAVEL forum.

Whilst I appreciate that everybody is entitled to have a view on this matter, I find it objectional that a thread started on matters relating to TRAVEL is cited as being a good example of people that do not care for anything but animals.

I have friends that live in Zimbabwe both black and white, and I have been unable to contact them for some time.



 


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement -